Author
Listed:
- Shengtong Di
(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China
Key Laboratory of Geological Safety of Coastal Urban Underground Space, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao Geo-Engineering Surveying Institute, Qingdao 266101, China)
- Yueheng Li
(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China)
- Caiping Hu
(Shandong Provincial Geo-Mineral Engineering Exploration Institute, Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources, Jinan 250014, China
Key Laboratory of Geological Disaster Risk Prevention and Control, Emergency Management Department of Shandong Province, Jinan 250014, China)
- Yue Yuan
(Key Laboratory of Geological Safety of Coastal Urban Underground Space, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao Geo-Engineering Surveying Institute, Qingdao 266101, China)
- Zhongsheng Wang
(Key Laboratory of Geological Safety of Coastal Urban Underground Space, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao Geo-Engineering Surveying Institute, Qingdao 266101, China)
- Meijun Xu
(Key Laboratory of Geological Safety of Coastal Urban Underground Space, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao Geo-Engineering Surveying Institute, Qingdao 266101, China)
- Jie Dong
(Key Laboratory of Geological Safety of Coastal Urban Underground Space, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao Geo-Engineering Surveying Institute, Qingdao 266101, China)
Abstract
The development of urban underground space is a necessary way to realize the sustainable development of the city, and it is also an essential means to solve urban environmental problems such as traffic congestion and resource shortage. Scientific suitability evaluation is the prerequisite for the rational planning and development of underground space. Previous studies have encountered problems such as an imperfect index system, a single weighting method, and loss of membership degrees in fuzzy evaluation, which have led to unreasonable evaluation results. Taking the northern coastal cities of Weifang as the research area, the evaluation index system is established, and the index weights are calculated by the improved structural CRITIC. An improved fuzzy mathematical evaluation model based on the weighted summation method is proposed to carry out the suitability evaluation of underground space development in the research area. The results show that: (1) The proposed method of combination weight and improved fuzzy mathematics evaluation takes into account the scientific weight and avoids the subjective bias, and also corrects the issue of membership degree loss in the membership matrix of comprehensive evaluation. (2) When the area of the grid unit is 0.02% of the area of the research area, the size of the evaluation unit is more reasonable. (3) The area that is very suitable for underground space development accounts for 8.69%, and the more suitable area accounts for 25.55%, mainly located in the northwest and central–southern regions of the research area. It can provide a reference for the suitability evaluation of underground space development.
Suggested Citation
Shengtong Di & Yueheng Li & Caiping Hu & Yue Yuan & Zhongsheng Wang & Meijun Xu & Jie Dong, 2025.
"Suitability Evaluation of Underground Space Development in Coastal Cities Based on Combined Subjective and Objective Weight and an Improved Fuzzy Mathematics Method,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-21, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6862-:d:1711909
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6862-:d:1711909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.