IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3313-d1065047.html

Suitability Assessment of Small Dams’ Location as Nature-Based Solutions to Reduce Flood Risk in Mataniko Catchment, Honiara, Solomon Islands

Author

Listed:
  • Junhang Liu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Design, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Building 100, Victoria St., Carlton, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Junhe Tan

    (School of Architecture and Urban Design, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Building 100, Victoria St., Carlton, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Shihao Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Chenghao Zhong

    (School of Architecture and Urban Design, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Building 100, Victoria St., Carlton, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Liang Lv

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Ata Tara

    (School of Architecture and Urban Design, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Building 100, Victoria St., Carlton, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

As global temperatures rise, flooding and storm surges caused by extreme weather threaten people’s safety and nations’ development. Nature-based Solutions (NBS) are practical actions to support resilience to reduce flood risk and are applied in many countries. As the NBS approach mentions, small check dams made of gabion and wood can retain runoff and temporarily create detention basins to reduce the magnitude of floods and provide additional water resources. However, previous dam suitability research emphasized the criteria selection and decision method evolution, which costs time on the complex calculation and does not fit the NBS small dams. This research aims to optimize the site selection workflow of small dams in vulnerable informal settlements by utilizing Remote Sensing (RS), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE). Several thematic layers, such as land use, river density, building distance, vegetation cover index, slope, and elevation factors, were chosen to identify the suitable area in Mataniko catchment, Honiara. More importantly, it provides a more efficient model builder that can be replicated in ArcGIS 10.8, which contributes to visualizing scenarios of the inundation area of small dams at different heights. As a result, this study tested up to 35 potential small dams with 2.5 and 5 m wall height in the flood-prone Vara Creek and selected nine small dams with 5 m height and 15 small dams at 2.5 m as the best locations according to the volume and area. Overall, it is an efficient tool for designers to communicate with different stakeholders and applies to other developing countries facing frequent floods. Moreover, it provides a prototype and evidence of NBS action to address the flood issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Junhang Liu & Junhe Tan & Shihao Zhang & Chenghao Zhong & Liang Lv & Ata Tara, 2023. "Suitability Assessment of Small Dams’ Location as Nature-Based Solutions to Reduce Flood Risk in Mataniko Catchment, Honiara, Solomon Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3313-:d:1065047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3313/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3313/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas L. Saaty, 1986. "Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(7), pages 841-855, July.
    2. repec:iwt:rerpts:h026190 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Keller, Andrew & Sakthivadivel, Ramasamy & Seckler, David, 2000. "Water scarcity and the role of storage in development," IWMI Research Reports 44575, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Oswald Jenewein & Michelle A. Hummel, 2022. "Co-Creating Climate Adaptation Pathways in Coastal Cities: A Practical Guide for Engaged Scholars and Urban Designers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Giacomo Bernello & Elena Mondino & Lucia Bortolini, 2022. "People’s Perception of Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation: The Case of Veneto Region (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boini Narsimlu & J. V. N. S. Prasad & A. Amarender Reddy & Gajjala Ravindra Chary & Kodigal A. Gopinath & K. B. Sridhar & J. K. Balyan & Anil K. Kothari & Vinod Kumar Singh, 2024. "Catchment Storage Command Relationship for Sustainable Rainfed Agriculture in the Semi-Arid Regions of Rajasthan, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reza Banai, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    2. Guh, Yuh-Yuan, 1997. "Introduction to a new weighting method -- Hierarchy consistency analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 215-226, October.
    3. Cui, Ye & E, Hanyu & Pedrycz, Witold & Fayek, Aminah Robinson, 2022. "A granular multicriteria group decision making for renewable energy planning problems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1047-1059.
    4. Xiaoxia Li, 2022. "Research on the Development Level of Rural E-Commerce in China Based on Analytic Hierarchy and Systematic Clustering Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Danijela Tuljak-Suban & Patricija Bajec, 2022. "A Hybrid DEA Approach for the Upgrade of an Existing Bike-Sharing System with Electric Bikes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & Pascual Fernández Martínez & Amelia Pérez Zabaleta & João C. Azevedo, 2021. "Dealing with Water Conflicts: A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Approaches to Manage Freshwater Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-32, April.
    7. Bhatta, Arun & Bigsby, Hugh R. & Cullen, Ross, 2011. "Alternative to Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Markets: The Contribution of Forest-Related Programs in New Zealand," 2011 Conference, August 25-26, 2011, Nelson, New Zealand 115350, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Li-zhu Yue & Jia-wei Zhang & Yue Lv, 2024. "Pyramid-Shaped Indicators: Evaluating the Robustness of Scheme Comparisons Under Weight Uncertainty," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 631-656, September.
    9. Hoene, Andreas & Jawale, Mandar & Neukirchen, Thomas & Bednorz, Nicole & Schulz, Holger & Hauser, Simon, 2019. "Bewertung von Technologielösungen für Automatisierung und Ergonomieunterstützung der Intralogistik," ild Schriftenreihe 64, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, Institut für Logistik- & Dienstleistungsmanagement (ild).
    10. Sudhakar Yedla & Ram M. Shrestha, 2007. "Application of analytic hierarchy process to prioritize urban transport options: Comparative analysis of group aggregation methods," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2007-011, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    11. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Radojko Lukic, 2020. "Analysis Of The Efficiency Of Trade In Oil Derivatives In Serbia By Applying The Fuzzy Ahp-Topsis Method," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(3), pages 80-98, September.
    13. Ya-Qiang Xu & Le-Sheng Jin & Zhen-Song Chen & Ronald R. Yager & Jana Špirková & Martin Kalina & Surajit Borkotokey, 2022. "Weight Vector Generation in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Basic Uncertain Information," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, February.
    14. Elvan Ender Altay & Diba Şenay & Zeynep Eyüpoğlu, 2021. "Outdoor Indicators for the Healthy Development of Children," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(6), pages 2517-2545, December.
    15. Iva Ridjan Skov & Noémi Schneider & Gerald Schweiger & Josef-Peter Schöggl & Alfred Posch, 2021. "Power-to-X in Denmark: An Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Baback Vaziri & Shaunak Dabadghao & Yuehwern Yih & Thomas L. Morin & Mark Lehto, 2020. "Crowd-Ranking: a Markov-based method for ranking alternatives," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 279-295, March.
    17. Berumen, Sergio A. & Pérez-Megino, Luis P., 2016. "Ranking Socioeconómico para el Desarrollo de las Regiones Carboníferas en Europa || Socioeconomic Ranking for the Development of coal-mining regions in Europe," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 21(1), pages 39-57, June.
    18. Hsin-Chieh Wu & Toly Chen & Chin-Hau Huang, 2020. "A Piecewise Linear FGM Approach for Efficient and Accurate FAHP Analysis: Smart Backpack Design as an Example," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Jain, Bharat A. & Nag, Barin N., 1996. "A decision-support model for investment decisions in new ventures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 473-486, May.
    20. repec:iwt:bosers:h026618 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Wiebke Mohr & Anika Rädke & Adel Afi & Franka Mühlichen & Moritz Platen & Annelie Scharf & Bernhard Michalowsky & Wolfgang Hoffmann, 2022. "Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care—Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3313-:d:1065047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.