IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3146-d1062543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Technologies for Public Health Services after the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Risk Management Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Loredana Larisa Văduva (Ene)

    (The Institute of National Economy, The Romanian Academy, Calea 13 Septembrie no. 13, sector 5, 050711 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ana-Maria Nedelcu

    (The Institute of National Economy, The Romanian Academy, Calea 13 Septembrie no. 13, sector 5, 050711 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Daniela Stancu (Zamfir)

    (The Institute of National Economy, The Romanian Academy, Calea 13 Septembrie no. 13, sector 5, 050711 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristinel Bălan

    (The Institute of National Economy, The Romanian Academy, Calea 13 Septembrie no. 13, sector 5, 050711 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ioan-Matei Purcărea

    (The Institute of National Economy, The Romanian Academy, Calea 13 Septembrie no. 13, sector 5, 050711 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihaela Gurău

    (The Institute of National Economy, The Romanian Academy, Calea 13 Septembrie no. 13, sector 5, 050711 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Daniel Alin Cristian

    (Department 10, General Surgery, Faculty of General Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu Str., 020021 Bucharest, Romania
    “Colțea” Clinical Hospital 1 Ion C. Brătianu Blvd., 030167 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Digitalization has become an important part of human lives that occurs in many fields, ranging from education to labor. Artificial intelligence is one of the most important disruptive technologies, which has produced massive changes in current medical practices, such as MRI, X-ray, and surgeries. AI-based surgeries present lower risks to patients and support medical specialists when it comes to burnout and more challenging operations, which can be more easily performed with the help of robots. The COVID-19 pandemic had a huge impact on healthcare systems due to the large number of patients that overburdened medical healthcare professionals and the medical capacities of hospitals. In this paper, we approach AI-based tools, which have a significant impact on various specializations in medicine under the form of robots, based on an extensive literature review. The research methods consist of a quantitative study conducted on a sample of 50 nurses with the purpose of assessing the awareness of nurses regarding digital technologies used in the medical field, focusing mainly on their capacity to classify digital technological risks that may occur in a public healthcare system. The results show that most of the respondents (62%) are aware of digital applications used in hospitals and are able to classify and manage the risks that may occur. After conducting our research, we found that nurses have a certain degree of reluctance when it comes to the introduction of digital technologies in the medical field.

Suggested Citation

  • Loredana Larisa Văduva (Ene) & Ana-Maria Nedelcu & Daniela Stancu (Zamfir) & Cristinel Bălan & Ioan-Matei Purcărea & Mihaela Gurău & Daniel Alin Cristian, 2023. "Digital Technologies for Public Health Services after the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Risk Management Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3146-:d:1062543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3146/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3146/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina Bicchieri & Enrique Fatas & Abraham Aldama & Andrés Casas & Ishwari Deshpande & Mariagiulia Lauro & Cristina Parilli & Max Spohn & Paula Pereira & Ruiling Wen, 2021. "In science we (should) trust: Expectations and compliance across nine countries during the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Sang M. Lee & DonHee Lee, 2020. "Lessons Learned from Battling COVID-19: The Korean Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Muhammad Bilawal Khaskheli & Shumin Wang & Xiaoshan Yan & Yuehan He, 2023. "Innovation of the Social Security, Legal Risks, Sustainable Management Practices and Employee Environmental Awareness in The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Katarzyna Kolasa & Grzegorz Kozinski, 2020. "How to Value Digital Health Interventions? A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Guiyang Zhu & Mabel C. Chou & Christina W. Tsai, 2020. "Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic Exposing the Shortcomings of Current Supply Chain Operations: A Long-Term Prescriptive Offering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jordi Brandts & Isabel Busom & Cristina Lopez-Mayan & Judith Panadés, 2022. "Images Say More Than Just Words: Effectiveness of Visual and Text Communication in Dispelling the Rent–Control Misconception," Working Papers 1322, Barcelona School of Economics.
    2. Nam-gun Kim & Hyeri Jang & Seungkeun Noh & Ju-hee Hong & Jongsoon Jung & Jinho Shin & Yongseung Shin & Jongseong Kim, 2022. "Analyzing the Effect of Social Distancing Policies on Traffic at Sinchon Station, South Korea, during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020 and 2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Akfırat, Serap & Bayrak, Fatih & Üzümçeker, Emir & Ergiyen, Tolga & Yurtbakan, Taylan & Uysal, Mete Sefa, 2023. "The roles of social norms and leadership in health communication in the context of COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    4. Hotlan Siagian & Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan & Ferry Jie, 2021. "Supply Chain Integration Enables Resilience, Flexibility, and Innovation to Improve Business Performance in COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, April.
    5. George Maramba & Hanlie Smuts & Funmi Adebesin & Marie Hattingh & Tendani Mawela, 2023. "KMS as a Sustainability Strategy during a Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Oskari Lähdeaho & Ville Henttu & Per Hilletofth, 2020. "Covid-19 Pandemic: Early Implications for North European Manufacturing and Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Margherita Molinaro & Pietro Romano & Gianluca Sperone, 2023. "The organizational side of a disruption mitigation process: exploring a case study during the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Jelena Končar & Aleksandar Grubor & Radenko Marić & Sonja Vučenović & Goran Vukmirović, 2020. "Setbacks to IoT Implementation in the Function of FMCG Supply Chain Sustainability during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Sorin ȘOMÎTCĂ & Alina CRÎȘMARIU (ȘOMÎTCĂ), 2022. "The Two Sides of the Coin – The Success and Failure of the Business," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 3(8), pages 56-62, August.
    10. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea, 2021. "Covid-19 and Technology," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1001, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. Sara Majid & Xin Zhang & Muhammad Bilawal Khaskheli & Feng Hong & Patricia Jie Hung King & Imran Haider Shamsi, 2023. "Eco-Efficiency, Environmental and Sustainable Innovation in Recycling Energy and Their Effect on Business Performance: Evidence from European SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-30, June.
    12. Ozan Aksoy, 2022. "Within-family influences on compliance with social-distancing measures during COVID-19 lockdowns in the United Kingdom," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1660-1668, December.
    13. Yılmaz, Ömer Faruk & Yeni, Fatma Betül & Gürsoy Yılmaz, Beren & Özçelik, Gökhan, 2023. "An optimization-based methodology equipped with lean tools to strengthen medical supply chain resilience during a pandemic: A case study from Turkey," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    14. Ocampo, Lanndon & Aro, Joerabell Lourdes & Evangelista, Samantha Shane & Maturan, Fatima & Atibing, Nadine May & Yamagishi, Kafferine & Selerio, Egberto, 2023. "Synthesis of strategies in post-COVID-19 public sector supply chains under an intuitionistic fuzzy environment," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    15. Katarzyna Zagórska & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Nick Hanley, 2022. "“GMO – Doesn’t Have To Go!” – Consumers’ Preferences Towards Genetically Modified Products Labelling and Sale," Working Papers 2022-07, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    16. Chowdhury, Priyabrata & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar & Kaisar, Shahriar & Moktadir, Md. Abdul, 2021. "COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    17. Eulalia Skawińska & Romuald I. Zalewski, 2021. "Activities of Food Retail Companies in Poland during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Context of Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Mutahhar A. Dar & Bartlomiej Gladysz & Aleksander Buczacki, 2021. "Impact of COVID19 on Operational Activities of Manufacturing Organizations—A Case Study and Industry 4.0-Based Survive-Stabilise-Sustainability (3S) Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-28, March.
    19. Jethro Kiers & Jaap Seinhorst & Mirthe Zwanenburg & Klaas Stek, 2022. "Which Strategies and Corresponding Competences Are Needed to Improve Supply Chain Resilience: A COVID-19 Based Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Angerer, Silvia & Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Lergetporer, Philipp & Rittmannsberger, Thomas, 2023. "How does the vaccine approval procedure affect COVID-19 vaccination intentions?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3146-:d:1062543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.