IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2827-d1057356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Unraveling Loyalty Model of Traditional Retail to Suppliers for Business Sustainability in the Digital Transformation Era: Insight from MSMEs in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Mujianto Mujianto

    (School of Business, IPB University, Jl. Raya Pajajaran, Bogor 16151, Indonesia)

  • Hartoyo Hartoyo

    (School of Business, IPB University, Jl. Raya Pajajaran, Bogor 16151, Indonesia)

  • Rita Nurmalina

    (Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Economic and Management, IPB University, Jl. Agatis, Campus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Eva Z. Yusuf

    (School of Business, IPB University, Jl. Raya Pajajaran, Bogor 16151, Indonesia)

Abstract

The development of fast-moving consumer goods (FMCGs) retail has demonstrated an evolution of buyer–seller interactions. In the era of digital transformation, FMCGs and micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) can easily use website applications to shop for various products from suppliers, make payments, and access a wider variety of products with more efficient delivery. However, empirical studies on loyalty drivers on B2B relationships for business sustainability in the retail industry have not received much attention. This research aimed to examine the factors that influence loyalty and analyze the mediating role of MSME loyalty by discussing a new conceptual framework designed based on the buyer–seller relationship theory and relational marketing. Data were collected from 500 owners or managers of FMCG retail stalls in various provinces in Indonesia and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). The results showed that merchandising, website quality, commitment, and satisfaction have a positive effect on loyalty, as opposed to service quality and trust. There are also different roles in the mediating variables of trust, commitment, and satisfaction on retail store loyalty. These findings were useful for policymakers, managers, and practitioners to clarify the influence of service quality, merchandising website quality, and the role of relationship quality on loyalty in the era of digital transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mujianto Mujianto & Hartoyo Hartoyo & Rita Nurmalina & Eva Z. Yusuf, 2023. "The Unraveling Loyalty Model of Traditional Retail to Suppliers for Business Sustainability in the Digital Transformation Era: Insight from MSMEs in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-31, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2827-:d:1057356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2827/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2827/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rauyruen, Papassapa & Miller, Kenneth E., 2007. "Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 21-31, January.
    2. R. Chumpitaz & N. Paparoidamis, 2007. "Service quality, relationship satisfaction, trust, commitment, and business-to-business loyalty," Post-Print hal-00199063, HAL.
    3. Wolfgang Ulaga & Andreas Eggert, 2006. "Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business-to-business relationships," Post-Print hal-00482522, HAL.
    4. Jengchung Victor Chen & David C. Yen & Wannasri Pornpriphet & Andree E. Widjaja, 2015. "E-commerce web site loyalty: A cross cultural comparison," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 1283-1299, December.
    5. Muhammad Saqib Khan & Haijun Wang & Qing Wang & Waseem Khan & Tahira Javed, 2021. "Examining the relationship between the level of logistics service quality, relationship quality and repurchase intention in e-retail sector of Pakistan," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(1), pages 189-204, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rafael Martínez-Peláez & Alberto Ochoa-Brust & Solange Rivera & Vanessa G. Félix & Rodolfo Ostos & Héctor Brito & Ramón A. Félix & Luis J. Mena, 2023. "Role of Digital Transformation for Achieving Sustainability: Mediated Role of Stakeholders, Key Capabilities, and Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Muhammad Babar Shahzad & Imran Bashir Dar & Raniyah Wazirali, 2023. "The Fear of the Known and Unknown in Being the Sustainable Business: Environmental Concern Reflected by Axfood (Sweden)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-9, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simona-Mihaela TRIF, 2012. "Antecedents and consequences of relationship quality. A case study of banking sector in Romania," Timisoara Journal of Economics, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 5(18), pages 253-271.
    2. Boniface, Bonaventure & Gyau, Amos & Stringer, Randy & Umberger, Wendy J., 2010. "Building producer loyalty in Malaysia's fresh milk supply chain," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 18, pages 1-19.
    3. Svensson, Göran & Mysen, Tore & Payan, Janice, 2010. "Balancing the sequential logic of quality constructs in manufacturing-supplier relationships -- Causes and outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1209-1214, November.
    4. Muhammed S. Alnsour, 2018. "Online relationship marketing for banks in face-to-face economies," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(3), pages 105-116, September.
    5. Shyh-Ming Huang & Shyh-Rong Fang & Shih-Chieh Fang & Chao-Chin Huang, 2016. "The influences of brand benefits on brand loyalty: Intermediate mechanisms," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 41(1), pages 141-160, February.
    6. Chen Qian & Stefan Seuring & Ralf Wagner, 2021. "Reviewing interfirm relationship quality from a supply chain management perspective," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 625-650, July.
    7. Juan Carlos Fandos-Roig & Javier Sánchez-García & Sandra Tena-Monferrer & Luis José Callarisa-Fiol, 2020. "Does CSR Help to Retain Customers in a Service Company?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Wu, Lei-Yu & Chen, Po-Yuan & Chen, Kuan-Yang, 2015. "Why does loyalty–cooperation behavior vary over buyer–seller relationship?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2322-2329.
    9. Yu-Te Tu & Yu-Yi Chang, 2014. "Customer Commitment as a Mediating Variable between Corporate Brand Image and Customer Loyalty," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 5(1), pages 17-27.
    10. Andrea Moretta Tartaglione & Ylenia Cavacece & Giuseppe Russo & Giuseppe Granata, 2019. "A Systematic Mapping Study on Customer Loyalty and Brand Management," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Ibrahim Alnawas & Shadi Altarifi, 2016. "Customer emotional regulation and relationship quality: Evidence from the banking industry," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 254-266, December.
    12. Sarmiento Guede, José Ramón & De Esteban Curiel, Javier & Antonovica, Arta, 2021. "Increase the influence of the travel video bloggers by using Youtube to sell trips indirectly through relationship marketing and service quality online," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    13. Pfajfar, Gregor & Shoham, Aviv & Małecka, Agnieszka & Zalaznik, Maja, 2022. "Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact – Relationship marketing perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 46-61.
    14. Eugine Tafadzwa Maziriri & Thobekani Lose & Welcome Madinga, 2017. "The Influence of Relationship Proneness on Relationship Satisfaction and Relationship Commitment: Empirical Evidence from Domestic Tourists in Cape Town, South Africa," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 13(1), pages 173-186, February.
    15. Liu, Chung-Tzer & Guo, Yi Maggie & Lee, Chia-Hui, 2011. "The effects of relationship quality and switching barriers on customer loyalty," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 71-79.
    16. Danik Lidia, 2015. "Inter-firm Relationship Quality vs. Perceived Cultural Differences," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 45(1), pages 7-31, March.
    17. Florin Alexandru LUCA & Claudia Ioana CIOBANU, 2016. "Relationship Quality In Real Estate Companies," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 10, pages 91-98, April.
    18. Professor Anil Keskar & More Pranay, 2018. "Relationship Value –A Study of Various Published Articles," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 9(2), pages 96-112, May.
    19. Mauro Sciarelli & Abdelhakim Nagm & Mona Dakrory & Mario Tani & Mohamed Khashan, 2017. "Mediating Service Recovery Satisfaction in the Relationship between Internet Service Recovery and Customer Loyalty," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, September.
    20. Gomaa Agag, 2019. "E-commerce Ethics and Its Impact on Buyer Repurchase Intentions and Loyalty: An Empirical Study of Small and Medium Egyptian Businesses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 389-410, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2827-:d:1057356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.