IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16906-d1301516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Thermodynamic Performance Evaluation of Various Gas Liquefaction Cycles for Cryogenic Energy Storage

Author

Listed:
  • Muhsin Kılıç

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bursa Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, Türkiye)

  • Ayse Fidan Altun

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bursa Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, Türkiye)

Abstract

This paper conducts comparative thermodynamic analysis and performance evaluations of various gas liquefaction configurations. The four most common liquefaction systems (Linde–Hampson, Kapitza, Heylandt, and Claude) were considered. The isothermal and multi-stage isentropic compression processes were evaluated and compared as actual compression processes. Thermodynamic evaluation is based on the energy required to compress a unit mass of gas, the liquefied air mass flow rate, and the exergetic efficiency. The modeling results show that three-stage compression cycles retain lower energy requirements. Increasing the compression stage from one to two for all the processes decreases the energy requirement by 34 to 38%. Changing the compression stage number from two to three reduces the energy requirement by 13%. The compression pressure and expander flow rate ratio significantly affect the liquefied air mass flow rate. Hence, a parametric analysis was conducted to obtain the best operating conditions for each considered cycle. Depending on the compression pressure, the optimum expander flow rate values of the Claude, Kapitza, and Heylandt cycles change from 0.65 to 0.5, 0.65 to 0.55, and 0.35 to 0.30, respectively. For the optimum cases, the Claude, Kapitza, and Heylandt cycles result in liquid yields that are about 2.5, 2.2, and 1.6 times higher than that of the Linde–Hampson cycle. The Claude cycle is the best operating cycle for all the considered performance metrics. Moreover, the performances of the Linde–Hampson and Claude cycles are investigated for various gases. Under the same operating conditions, the results show that better performance parameters are obtained with the gases that have relatively high normal boiling temperatures.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhsin Kılıç & Ayse Fidan Altun, 2023. "Comprehensive Thermodynamic Performance Evaluation of Various Gas Liquefaction Cycles for Cryogenic Energy Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16906-:d:1301516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16906/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16906/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayah Marwan Rabi & Jovana Radulovic & James M. Buick, 2023. "Comprehensive Review of Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Tafone, Alessio & Ding, Yulong & Li, Yongliang & Xie, Chunping & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2020. "Levelised Cost of Storage (LCOS) analysis of liquid air energy storage system integrated with Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Antonelli, Marco & Barsali, Stefano & Desideri, Umberto & Giglioli, Romano & Paganucci, Fabrizio & Pasini, Gianluca, 2017. "Liquid air energy storage: Potential and challenges of hybrid power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 522-529.
    4. Morgan, Robert & Nelmes, Stuart & Gibson, Emma & Brett, Gareth, 2015. "Liquid air energy storage – Analysis and first results from a pilot scale demonstration plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 845-853.
    5. Tafone, Alessio & Borri, Emiliano & Comodi, Gabriele & van den Broek, Martijn & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2018. "Liquid Air Energy Storage performance enhancement by means of Organic Rankine Cycle and Absorption Chiller," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1810-1821.
    6. Dzido, Aleksandra & Krawczyk, Piotr & Wołowicz, Marcin & Badyda, Krzysztof, 2022. "Comparison of advanced air liquefaction systems in Liquid Air Energy Storage applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 727-739.
    7. Peng, Hao & Shan, Xuekun & Yang, Yu & Ling, Xiang, 2018. "A study on performance of a liquid air energy storage system with packed bed units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 126-135.
    8. She, Xiaohui & Zhang, Tongtong & Cong, Lin & Peng, Xiaodong & Li, Chuan & Luo, Yimo & Ding, Yulong, 2019. "Flexible integration of liquid air energy storage with liquefied natural gas regasification for power generation enhancement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Aasadnia, Majid & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2018. "Large-scale liquid hydrogen production methods and approaches: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 57-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2022. "Liquid air as an emerging energy vector towards carbon neutrality: A multi-scale systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Borri, Emiliano & Tafone, Alessio & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Comodi, Gabriele, 2021. "A review on liquid air energy storage: History, state of the art and recent developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Tafone, Alessio & Ding, Yulong & Li, Yongliang & Xie, Chunping & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2020. "Levelised Cost of Storage (LCOS) analysis of liquid air energy storage system integrated with Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Ayah Marwan Rabi & Jovana Radulovic & James M. Buick, 2023. "Comprehensive Review of Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    5. O'Callaghan, O. & Donnellan, P., 2021. "Liquid air energy storage systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    6. He, Tianbiao & Lv, Hongyu & Shao, Zixian & Zhang, Jibao & Xing, Xialian & Ma, Huigang, 2020. "Cascade utilization of LNG cold energy by integrating cryogenic energy storage, organic Rankine cycle and direct cooling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    7. Mousavi, Shadi Bashiri & Ahmadi, Pouria & Adib, Mahdieh & Izadi, Ali, 2023. "Techno-economic assessment of an efficient liquid air energy storage with ejector refrigeration cycle for peak shaving of renewable energies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 96-113.
    8. Mylena Vieira Pinto Menezes & Icaro Figueiredo Vilasboas & Julio Augusto Mendes da Silva, 2022. "Liquid Air Energy Storage System (LAES) Assisted by Cryogenic Air Rankine Cycle (ARC)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Lee, Inkyu & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems design and analysis of liquid air energy storage from liquefied natural gas cold energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 168-180.
    10. Legrand, Mathieu & Labajo-Hurtado, Raúl & Rodríguez-Antón, Luis Miguel & Doce, Yolanda, 2022. "Price arbitrage optimization of a photovoltaic power plant with liquid air energy storage. Implementation to the Spanish case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    11. Wang, Chen & Akkurt, Nevzat & Zhang, Xiaosong & Luo, Yimo & She, Xiaohui, 2020. "Techno-economic analyses of multi-functional liquid air energy storage for power generation, oxygen production and heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    12. Tafone, Alessio & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Borri, Emiliano & Comodi, Gabriele, 2019. "New parametric performance maps for a novel sizing and selection methodology of a Liquid Air Energy Storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1641-1656.
    13. Peng, Xiaodong & She, Xiaohui & Li, Chuan & Luo, Yimo & Zhang, Tongtong & Li, Yongliang & Ding, Yulong, 2019. "Liquid air energy storage flexibly coupled with LNG regasification for improving air liquefaction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1190-1201.
    14. Park, Jinwoo & Qi, Meng & Kim, Jeongdong & Noh, Wonjun & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2020. "Exergoeconomic optimization of liquid air production by use of liquefied natural gas cold energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    15. Chen, Jiaxiang & Yang, Luwei & An, Baolin & Hu, Jianying & Wang, Junjie, 2022. "Unsteady analysis of the cold energy storage heat exchanger in a liquid air energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    16. Xue, Xiao-Dai & Zhang, Tong & Zhang, Xue-Lin & Ma, Lin-Rui & He, Ya-Ling & Li, Ming-Jia & Mei, Sheng-Wei, 2021. "Performance evaluation and exergy analysis of a novel combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) system based on liquid air energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    17. Dzido, Aleksandra & Krawczyk, Piotr & Wołowicz, Marcin & Badyda, Krzysztof, 2022. "Comparison of advanced air liquefaction systems in Liquid Air Energy Storage applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 727-739.
    18. Osorio, Julian D. & Panwar, Mayank & Rivera-Alvarez, Alejandro & Chryssostomidis, Chrys & Hovsapian, Rob & Mohanpurkar, Manish & Chanda, Sayonsom & Williams, Herbert, 2020. "Enabling thermal efficiency improvement and waste heat recovery using liquid air harnessed from offshore renewable energy sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    19. Yang, S., 2022. "Solar-driven liquid air power plant modeling, design space exploration, and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    20. Wang, Chen & Zhang, Xiaosong & You, Zhanping & Zhang, Muxing & Huang, Shifang & She, Xiaohui, 2021. "The effect of air purification on liquid air energy storage – An analysis from molecular to systematic modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16906-:d:1301516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.