IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16593-d1294987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transfer-Ensemble Learning: A Novel Approach for Mapping Urban Land Use/Cover of the Indian Metropolitans

Author

Listed:
  • Prosenjit Barman

    (Department of Geography, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda 151401, India)

  • Sheikh Mustak

    (Department of Geography, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda 151401, India)

  • Monika Kuffer

    (Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, ITC, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Sudhir Kumar Singh

    (K. Banerjee Centre of Atmospheric and Ocean Studies, IIDS, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj 211002, India)

Abstract

Land use and land cover (LULC) classification plays a significant role in the analysis of climate change, evidence-based policies, and urban and regional planning. For example, updated and detailed information on land use in urban areas is highly needed to monitor and evaluate urban development plans. Machine learning (ML) algorithms, and particularly ensemble ML models support transferability and efficiency in mapping land uses. Generalization, model consistency, and efficiency are essential requirements for implementing such algorithms. The transfer-ensemble learning approach is increasingly used due to its efficiency. However, it is rarely investigated for mapping complex urban LULC in Global South cities, such as India. The main objective of this study is to assess the performance of machine and ensemble-transfer learning algorithms to map the LULC of two metropolitan cities of India using Landsat 5 TM, 2011, and DMSP-OLS nightlight, 2013. This study used classical ML algorithms, such as Support Vector Machine-Radial Basis Function (SVM-RBF), SVM-Linear, and Random Forest (RF). A total of 480 samples were collected to classify six LULC types. The samples were split into training and validation sets with a 65:35 ratio for the training, parameter tuning, and validation of the ML algorithms. The result shows that RF has the highest accuracy (94.43%) of individual models, as compared to SVM-RBF (85.07%) and SVM-Linear (91.99%). Overall, the ensemble model-4 produces the highest accuracy (94.84%) compared to other ensemble models for the Kolkata metropolitan area. In transfer learning, the pre-trained ensemble model-4 achieved the highest accuracy (80.75%) compared to other pre-trained ensemble models for Delhi. This study provides innovative guidelines for selecting a robust ML algorithm to map urban LULC at the metropolitan scale to support urban sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Prosenjit Barman & Sheikh Mustak & Monika Kuffer & Sudhir Kumar Singh, 2023. "Transfer-Ensemble Learning: A Novel Approach for Mapping Urban Land Use/Cover of the Indian Metropolitans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16593-:d:1294987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16593/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16593/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lirong Yin & Lei Wang & Jianqiang Li & Siyu Lu & Jiawei Tian & Zhengtong Yin & Shan Liu & Wenfeng Zheng, 2023. "YOLOV4_CSPBi: Enhanced Land Target Detection Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Henderson, Vernon, 2003. "The Urbanization Process and Economic Growth: The So-What Question," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 47-71, March.
    3. Li, Zhengpeng & Liu, Shuguang & Tan, Zhengxi & Sohl, Terry L. & Wu, Yiping, 2017. "Simulating the effects of management practices on cropland soil organic carbon changes in the Temperate Prairies Ecoregion of the United States from 1980 to 2012," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 365(C), pages 68-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nora Libertun de Duren & Roberto Guerrero Compeán, 2016. "Growing resources for growing cities: Density and the cost of municipal public services in Latin America," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(14), pages 3082-3107, November.
    2. Dorota Ciołek & Anna Golejewska & Adriana Zabłocka‐Abi Yaghi, 2022. "Innovation drivers in regions. Does urbanization matter?," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1933-1960, December.
    3. Roberto Ganau & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2022. "Does urban concentration matter for changes in country economic performance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1275-1299, May.
    4. Jorge M. Uribe, 2023. ""Fiscal crises and climate change"," IREA Working Papers 202303, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Feb 2023.
    5. Dusan Paredes Araya & Tomothy M Komarek, 2013. "Spatial Income Inequality in Chile and the Rol of Spatial Labor Sorting," Documentos de Trabajo en Economia y Ciencia Regional 46, Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2013.
    6. QIN, Bo & WU, Jianfeng, 2015. "Does urban concentration mitigate CO2 emissions? Evidence from China 1998–2008," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 220-231.
    7. Xuesong Sun & Zaisheng Zhang, 2021. "Coupling and Coordination Level of the Population, Land, Economy, Ecology and Society in the Process of Urbanization: Measurement and Spatial Differentiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Partha Mukhopadhyay, 2018. "Engines without Drivers: Cities in India’s Growth Story," Working Papers id:12724, eSocialSciences.
    9. Partha Mukhopadhyay & Marie‐Hélène Zérah & Eric Denis, 2020. "Subaltern Urbanization: Indian Insights for Urban Theory," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 582-598, July.
    10. Richard Bluhm & Christian Lessmann & Paul Schaudt, 2021. "The Political Geography of Cities," SoDa Laboratories Working Paper Series 2021-11, Monash University, SoDa Laboratories.
    11. Michel DIMOU, 2008. "Urbanisation, Agglomeration Effects And Regional Inequality : An Introduction," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 27, pages 7-12.
    12. Maparu, Tuhin Subhra & Mazumder, Tarak Nath, 2017. "Transport infrastructure, economic development and urbanization in India (1990–2011): Is there any causal relationship?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 319-336.
    13. Waśniewski, Krzysztof, 2012. "Local governments’ fiscal policy as a factor of urban development – evidence from Poland," MPRA Paper 39176, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Steven Poelhekke & Frederick Van der Ploeg, 2008. "Growth, Foreign Direct Investment and Urban Concentrations: Unbundling Spatial Lags," CESifo Working Paper Series 2474, CESifo.
    15. Cerina, Fabio & Mureddu, Francesco, 2014. "Is agglomeration really good for growth? Global efficiency, interregional equity and uneven growth," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 9-22.
    16. Adriana Reveiu & Marian Dârdala, 2015. "Influence of Cluster Type Business Agglomerations for Development of Entrepreneurial Activities. Study about Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 107-107, February.
    17. Alfonso Díez-Minguela & Julio Martínez-Galarraga & Daniel A. Tirado Fabregat, 2013. "Why did Spanish regions not converge before the Civil War? Agglomeration and (regional) growth revisited: Spain, 1870-1930," Working Papers. Serie EC 2014-05, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    18. Lionel Artige & Carmen Camacho & David De La Croix, 2004. "Wealth Breeds Decline: Reversals of Leadership and Consumption Habits," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 423-449, December.
    19. Huang, Jie & Lu, Hongyang & Du, Minzhe, 2025. "Can digital economy narrow the regional economic gap? Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    20. J. Vernon Henderson & Adam Storeygard & David N. Weil, 2012. "Measuring Economic Growth from Outer Space," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(2), pages 994-1028, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16593-:d:1294987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.