IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15917-d1279709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability in Project Management: PM 2 versus PRiSM TM

Author

Listed:
  • Patrícia Marques

    (ALGORITMI Research Center/LASI, Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Paulo Sousa

    (ALGORITMI Research Center/LASI, Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Anabela Tereso

    (ALGORITMI Research Center/LASI, Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

Abstract

This paper makes a theoretical contribution by exploring the integration of sustainability principles into project management. It compares two recent methodologies, PM 2 and PRiSM TM , and provides a practical contribution by advocating for the adoption of these sustainability-driven practices among practitioners. Sustainability remains relatively unknown in the realm of project management, and this study aims to bridge that gap. This study follows an interpretivist philosophy and employs a combination of interviews and archival data analysis. PM 2 , created by the European Commission, provides a project management methodology free to organizations and includes best practices from other bodies of knowledge. However, it does not include sustainability because it aims to be generic. PRiSM TM , based on the P5™, aims to make the project management process more sustainable. PRiSM TM has a P5 Impact Analysis and Sustainability Management Plan as its main differentiating deliverables and is an extension of the Triple Bottom Line, also including product and process. The PM 2 Alliance CEO believes that PM 2 aims to be generic, so a focus on sustainability would remove the methodology’s “elasticity”. However, users wishing to use PM 2 and consider sustainability can include it in the additional objectives and use PRiSM TM to differentiate deliverables.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrícia Marques & Paulo Sousa & Anabela Tereso, 2023. "Sustainability in Project Management: PM 2 versus PRiSM TM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-36, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15917-:d:1279709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15917/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15917/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sneddon, Chris & Howarth, Richard B. & Norgaard, Richard B., 2006. "Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 253-268, May.
    2. Christophe Midler, 1995. "Projectification of the Firm : the Renault Case," Post-Print hal-00262524, HAL.
    3. Midler, Christophe, 1995. ""Projectification" of the firm: The renault case," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 363-375, December.
    4. Luis Fonseca & Filipe Carvalho & Gilberto Santos, 2023. "Strategic CSR: Framework for Sustainability through Management Systems Standards—Implementing and Disclosing Sustainable Development Goals and Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    5. I. V. Katunina & Yu. A. Fomina, 2021. "In Search Of Excellence In Social Entrepreneurship Project Management: Experience And Standards Of The European Union," Strategic decisions and risk management, Real Economy Publishing House, vol. 12(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    2. Nicolas Ricci & Sophie Hooge, 2024. "Caractériser la diversité des processus de création dans les Industries Culturelles et Créatives : une analyse qualitative comparée des régimes de conception créatifs," Post-Print hal-04759786, HAL.
    3. Peter B. Doeringer & Pacey Foster & Stephan Manning & David Terkla, 2013. "Project-based industries and craft-like production: structure, location and performance," Chapters, in: Frank Giarratani & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Philip McCann (ed.), Handbook of Industry Studies and Economic Geography, chapter 4, pages 99-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Małgorzata Ćwikła & Anna Góral & Ewa Bogacz-Wojtanowska & Magdalena Dudkiewicz, 2020. "Project-Based Work and Sustainable Development—A Comparative Case Study of Cultural Animation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-24, August.
    5. repec:hal:journl:hal-01070044 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Pierre-Antoine Arrighi & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2013. "Breaking the dilemma between robustness and generativeness: a comparative experiment on the use of new design software at the design-gap," Post-Print hal-00903606, HAL.
    7. Gernot Grabher, 2002. "Cool Projects, Boring Institutions: Temporary Collaboration in Social Context," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 205-214.
    8. Mitsuru Kodama & Tomoatsu Shibata, 2013. "Research into Ambidextrous R&D in Product Development New Product Development at a Precision Device Maker," TMARG Discussion Papers 109, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    9. Fanny Simon & Albéric Tellier, 2016. "Balancing contradictory temporality during the unfold of innovation streams," Post-Print hal-01572302, HAL.
    10. Jorg Sydow & Udo Staber, 2002. "The Institutional Embeddedness of Project Networks: The Case of Content Production in German Television," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 215-227.
    11. Hala Alioua & Fanny Simon, 2017. "Managing time pacing in organizations transitioning to a project- based mode – 3 case studies of two multinational companies," Post-Print hal-01597589, HAL.
    12. Kaouthar Mlaouhi & Lilia Gzara & Céline Cholez, 2021. "Use of Competency Management Methods and Tools in Project-based Organizations," Post-Print hal-03842413, HAL.
    13. David Dornisch, 2002. "The Evolution of Post-socialist Projects: Trajectory Shift and Transitional Capacity in a Polish Region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 307-321.
    14. Nabila Iken & Franck Aggeri & Stéphane Morel, 2020. "How to lead a sustainability transition at the company level? An approach based on management tools performativity [Comment mener une transition soutenable au niveau de l'entreprise ? Une approche ," Post-Print halshs-02903500, HAL.
    15. Stéphanie Tillement & Frédéric Garcias & Guy Minguet & Florence Charue Duboc, 2019. "Disentangling Exploitation and Exploration in Hybrid Projects: The Case of a New Nuclear Reactor Development," Post-Print halshs-02276378, HAL.
    16. Shankar Sankaran & Mattias Jacobsson & Tomas Blomquist, 2021. "The history and future of projects as a transition innovation: Towards a sustainable project management framework," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 696-714, October.
    17. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.
    18. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt53z3h2gt is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Frédéric Segonds & Julien Nelson & Améziane Aoussat, 2012. "PLM and architectural rehabilitation : a framework to improve collaboration in the early stages of design," Post-Print hal-00719169, HAL.
    20. Wagner Reinhard F. & Radujkovic Mladen, 2022. "Effects of lagging projectification in the public sector on realizing infrastructure projects," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 2559-2570, January.
    21. Thordur Vikingur Fridgeirsson & Helgi Thor Ingason & Haukur Ingi Jonasson & Bara Hlin Kristjansdottir, 2021. "The VUCAlity of Projects: A New Approach to Assess a Project Risk in a Complex World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, March.
    22. Martin Müller, 2014. "The Topological Multiplicities of Power: The Limits of Governing the Olympics," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 90(3), pages 321-339, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • P5 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15917-:d:1279709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.