IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15327-d1268065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capacity Value Assessment for a Combined Power Plant System of New Energy and Energy Storage Based on Robust Scheduling Rules

Author

Listed:
  • Sicheng Wang

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Weiqing Sun

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

Abstract

With the rapid increase in new energy penetration, the uncertainty of the power system increases sharply. We can smooth out fluctuations and promote the more grid-friendly integration of new energy by combining it with energy storage. This paper proposes an evaluation method for assessing the value of a combined power plant system of new energy and energy storage using robust scheduling rules. Firstly, the k-means clustering algorithm is improved by using the elbow method in order to generate typical scenarios that can be used for the operation optimization of the combined power plant system of new energy and energy storage. Then, a two-stage robust optimization model of the combined power plant system of new energy and energy storage with a min–max–min structure is constructed according to the uncertainty of new energy. In this model, the operation constraints and coordinated control of wind–solar–thermal–storage units are considered. By constructing the uncertainty set of the new energy output, the overall operating cost of the system is minimized and uncertainty adjustment parameters are introduced to flexibly adjust the conservatism of the scheduling rules. Furthermore, based on the column and constraint generation algorithm and strong duality theory, the original problem can be decomposed into a master problem and subproblems with mixed integer linear characteristics for an alternating solution, so as to obtain the optimal solution of the original problem, and finally obtain the robust scheduling rule with the lowest operating cost under the worst scenario. Finally, based on the wind and solar power output curves and the output of each unit under the robust scheduling rules, combined with the value estimation method of the combined power plant system of new energy and energy storage, the value of the combined power plant system of new energy and energy storage is evaluated. Through the establishment of models and example analysis, it is proven that raising the quantity of the grid-connected power generated with new energy will cause an increase in the volatility of the power system; it will also bring considerable benefits to new energy plants, and the energy storage can improve the stability of the system. The above can provide references for the subsequent energy storage configuration in the planning of a combined power plant system of new energy and energy storage.

Suggested Citation

  • Sicheng Wang & Weiqing Sun, 2023. "Capacity Value Assessment for a Combined Power Plant System of New Energy and Energy Storage Based on Robust Scheduling Rules," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15327-:d:1268065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15327/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15327/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yanbin & Sun, Yanting & Liu, Jiechao & Liu, Chang & Zhang, Feng, 2023. "A data driven robust optimization model for scheduling near-zero carbon emission power plant considering the wind power output uncertainties and electricity-carbon market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Ma, Tao & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin & Peng, Jinqing, 2015. "Optimal design of an autonomous solar–wind-pumped storage power supply system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 728-736.
    3. Lu, Yu & Xiang, Yue & Huang, Yuan & Yu, Bin & Weng, Liguo & Liu, Junyong, 2023. "Deep reinforcement learning based optimal scheduling of active distribution system considering distributed generation, energy storage and flexible load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    4. Wang, Chengshan & Jiao, Bingqi & Guo, Li & Tian, Zhe & Niu, Jide & Li, Siwei, 2016. "Robust scheduling of building energy system under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 366-376.
    5. Han, Rushuai & Hu, Qinran & Cui, Hantao & Chen, Tao & Quan, Xiangjun & Wu, Zaijun, 2022. "An optimal bidding and scheduling method for load service entities considering demand response uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    6. Lei, Kaixuan & Chang, Jianxia & Wang, Xuebin & Guo, Aijun & Wang, Yimin & Ren, Chengqing, 2023. "Peak shaving and short-term economic operation of hydro-wind-PV hybrid system considering the uncertainty of wind and PV power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Tianyu & Guo, Qi & Huang, Libin & Guo, Haiping & Lu, Yuanhong & Tu, Liang, 2023. "Microgrid source-network-load-storage master-slave game optimization method considering the energy storage overcharge/overdischarge risk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Meschede, Henning & Holzapfel, Peter & Kadelbach, Florian & Hesselbach, Jens, 2016. "Classification of global island regarding the opportunity of using RES," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 251-258.
    3. Bustos, Cristian & Watts, David, 2017. "Novel methodology for microgrids in isolated communities: Electricity cost-coverage trade-off with 3-stage technology mix, dispatch & configuration optimizations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 204-221.
    4. Yang, Weijia & Yang, Jiandong, 2019. "Advantage of variable-speed pumped storage plants for mitigating wind power variations: Integrated modelling and performance assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 720-732.
    5. He, Yi & Guo, Su & Zhou, Jianxu & Wu, Feng & Huang, Jing & Pei, Huanjin, 2021. "The many-objective optimal design of renewable energy cogeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Solomon, A.A. & Kammen, Daniel M. & Callaway, D., 2016. "Investigating the impact of wind–solar complementarities on energy storage requirement and the corresponding supply reliability criteria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 130-145.
    7. Ji, Ling & Zhang, Bei-Bei & Huang, Guo-He & Xie, Yu-Lei & Niu, Dong-Xiao, 2018. "GHG-mitigation oriented and coal-consumption constrained inexact robust model for regional energy structure adjustment – A case study for Jiangsu Province, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 549-562.
    8. Nge, Chee Lim & Ranaweera, Iromi U. & Midtgård, Ole-Morten & Norum, Lars, 2019. "A real-time energy management system for smart grid integrated photovoltaic generation with battery storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 774-785.
    9. Fan, Feilong & Huang, Wentao & Tai, Nengling & Zheng, Xiaodong & Hu, Yan & Ma, Zhoujun, 2018. "A conditional depreciation balancing strategy for the equitable operation of extended hybrid energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1937-1952.
    10. William López-Castrillón & Héctor H. Sepúlveda & Cristian Mattar, 2021. "Off-Grid Hybrid Electrical Generation Systems in Remote Communities: Trends and Characteristics in Sustainability Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.
    11. Zhang, Bingying & Li, Qiqiang & Wang, Luhao & Feng, Wei, 2018. "Robust optimization for energy transactions in multi-microgrids under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 346-360.
    12. Fahd A. Alturki & Emad Mahrous Awwad, 2021. "Sizing and Cost Minimization of Standalone Hybrid WT/PV/Biomass/Pump-Hydro Storage-Based Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Yongjie Zhong & Dongliang Xie & Suwei Zhai & Yonghui Sun, 2018. "Day-Ahead Hierarchical Steady State Optimal Operation for Integrated Energy System Based on Energy Hub," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Liu, Yixin & Guo, Li & Wang, Chengshan, 2018. "A robust operation-based scheduling optimization for smart distribution networks with multi-microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 130-140.
    15. Minsheng Yang & Jianqi Li & Rui Du & Jianying Li & Jian Sun & Xiaofang Yuan & Jiazhu Xu & Shifu Huang, 2022. "Reactive Power Optimization Model for Distribution Networks Based on the Second-Order Cone and Interval Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    16. He, Yi & Guo, Su & Zhou, Jianxu & Ye, Jilei & Huang, Jing & Zheng, Kun & Du, Xinru, 2022. "Multi-objective planning-operation co-optimization of renewable energy system with hybrid energy storages," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 776-790.
    17. Lan, Hai & Zhang, Chi & Hong, Ying-Yi & He, Yin & Wen, Shuli, 2019. "Day-ahead spatiotemporal solar irradiation forecasting using frequency-based hybrid principal component analysis and neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 389-402.
    18. Ak{i}n Tac{s}cikaraou{g}lu & Ozan Erdinc{c}, 2018. "A Profit Optimization Approach Based on the Use of Pumped-Hydro Energy Storage Unit and Dynamic Pricing," Papers 1806.05211, arXiv.org.
    19. Yumin Xu & Yansheng Lang & Boying Wen & Xiaonan Yang, 2019. "An Innovative Planning Method for the Optimal Capacity Allocation of a Hybrid Wind–PV–Pumped Storage Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Georgios K. Koulinas & Olympia E. Demesouka & Konstantinos A. Sidas & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2021. "A TOPSIS—Risk Matrix and Monte Carlo Expert System for Risk Assessment in Engineering Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15327-:d:1268065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.