IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14673-d1256614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostics of Early Faults in Wind Generator Bearings Using Hjorth Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur C. Santos

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Technology—Parana (UTFPR), Cornelio Procopio 86300-000, Brazil)

  • Wesley A. Souza

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Technology—Parana (UTFPR), Cornelio Procopio 86300-000, Brazil)

  • Gustavo V. Barbara

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Technology—Parana (UTFPR), Cornelio Procopio 86300-000, Brazil
    Federal Institute of Parana (IFPR), Telêmaco Borba 84271-120, Brazil)

  • Marcelo F. Castoldi

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Technology—Parana (UTFPR), Cornelio Procopio 86300-000, Brazil)

  • Alessandro Goedtel

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Technology—Parana (UTFPR), Cornelio Procopio 86300-000, Brazil)

Abstract

Machine learning techniques are a widespread approach to monitoring and diagnosing faults in electrical machines. These techniques extract information from collected signals and classify the health conditions of internal components. Among all internal components, bearings present the highest failure rate. Classifiers commonly employ vibration data acquired from electrical machines, which can indicate different levels of bearing failure severity. Given the circumstances, this work proposes a methodology for detecting early bearing failures in wind turbines, applying classifiers that rely on Hjorth parameters. The Hjorth parameters were applied to analyze vibration signals collected from experiments to distinguish states of normal functioning and states of malfunction, hence enabling the classification of distinct conditions. After the labeling stage using Hjorth parameters, classifiers were employed to provide an automatic early fault identification model, with the decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and k -nearest neighbors methods presenting accuracy levels of over 95%. Notably, the accuracy of the classifiers was maintained even after undergoing a dimensionality reduction process. Therefore, it can be stated that Hjorth parameters provide a feasible alternative for identifying early faults in wind generators through time-series analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur C. Santos & Wesley A. Souza & Gustavo V. Barbara & Marcelo F. Castoldi & Alessandro Goedtel, 2023. "Diagnostics of Early Faults in Wind Generator Bearings Using Hjorth Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14673-:d:1256614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14673/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14673/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Ping & Li, Ranran & Liu, Ningning & Gao, Yuyang, 2020. "A novel composite electricity demand forecasting framework by data processing and optimized support vector machine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    2. Nick Guenther & Matthias Schonlau, 2016. "Support vector machines," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 16(4), pages 917-937, December.
    3. Matteo Mazziotta & Adriano Pareto, 2022. "Normalization methods for spatio‐temporal analysis of environmental performance: Revisiting the Min–Max method," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), August.
    4. Vanya Van Belle & Ben Van Calster & Sabine Van Huffel & Johan A K Suykens & Paulo Lisboa, 2016. "Explaining Support Vector Machines: A Color Based Nomogram," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-33, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dario Sansone & Anna Zhu, 2023. "Using Machine Learning to Create an Early Warning System for Welfare Recipients," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 85(5), pages 959-992, October.
    2. Roberson Andrea, 2021. "Applying Machine Learning for Automatic Product Categorization," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(2), pages 395-410, June.
    3. Yi Yang & Yuting Bai & Xiaoyi Wang & Li Wang & Xuebo Jin & Qian Sun, 2020. "Group Decision-Making Support for Sustainable Governance of Algal Bloom in Urban Lakes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Achim Ahrens & Christian B. Hansen & Mark E. Schaffer, 2023. "pystacked: Stacking generalization and machine learning in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 23(4), pages 909-931, December.
    5. Yu, Baojun & Li, Changming & Mirza, Nawazish & Umar, Muhammad, 2022. "Forecasting credit ratings of decarbonized firms: Comparative assessment of machine learning models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Salman Khalid & Hyunho Hwang & Heung Soo Kim, 2021. "Real-World Data-Driven Machine-Learning-Based Optimal Sensor Selection Approach for Equipment Fault Detection in a Thermal Power Plant," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-27, November.
    7. Li, Jing-Ping & Mirza, Nawazish & Rahat, Birjees & Xiong, Deping, 2020. "Machine learning and credit ratings prediction in the age of fourth industrial revolution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Gründler, Klaus & Krieger, Tommy, 2021. "Using Machine Learning for measuring democracy: A practitioners guide and a new updated dataset for 186 countries from 1919 to 2019," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Feng, Qianqian & Sun, Xiaolei & Hao, Jun & Li, Jianping, 2021. "Predictability dynamics of multifactor-influenced installed capacity: A perspective of country clustering," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    10. Lu, Hongfang & Ma, Xin & Ma, Minda, 2021. "A hybrid multi-objective optimizer-based model for daily electricity demand prediction considering COVID-19," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    11. Na Tang & Maoxiang Yuan & Zhijun Chen & Jian Ma & Rui Sun & Yide Yang & Quanyuan He & Xiaowei Guo & Shixiong Hu & Junhua Zhou, 2023. "Machine Learning Prediction Model of Tuberculosis Incidence Based on Meteorological Factors and Air Pollutants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Jiang, Ping & Liu, Zhenkun & Wang, Jianzhou & Zhang, Lifang, 2021. "Decomposition-selection-ensemble forecasting system for energy futures price forecasting based on multi-objective version of chaos game optimization algorithm," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    13. Dai, Yeming & Yang, Xinyu & Leng, Mingming, 2022. "Forecasting power load: A hybrid forecasting method with intelligent data processing and optimized artificial intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Hazlee Azil Illias & Wee Zhao Liang, 2018. "Identification of transformer fault based on dissolved gas analysis using hybrid support vector machine-modified evolutionary particle swarm optimisation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    15. McKenzie, David & Sansone, Dario, 2017. "Man vs. Machine in Predicting Successful Entrepreneurs: Evidence from a Business Plan Competition in Nigeria," CEPR Discussion Papers 12523, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Yousefzadeh Barri, Elnaz & Farber, Steven & Jahanshahi, Hadi & Beyazit, Eda, 2022. "Understanding transit ridership in an equity context through a comparison of statistical and machine learning algorithms," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    17. Salvatore Flavio Pileggi, 2023. "Walking Together Indicator (WTI): Understanding and Measuring World Inequality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Li, Ranran & Hu, Yucai & Heng, Jiani & Chen, Xueli, 2021. "A novel multiscale forecasting model for crude oil price time series," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Wang, Jianzhou & Gao, Jialu & Wei, Danxiang, 2022. "Electric load prediction based on a novel combined interval forecasting system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    20. Wenninger, Simon & Kaymakci, Can & Wiethe, Christian, 2022. "Explainable long-term building energy consumption prediction using QLattice," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14673-:d:1256614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.