IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i1p814-d1022862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimentally Identifying the Influences of Key Parameters for an Organic Rankine Cycle Using R123

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Gao

    (Collaborative Innovation Center of Energy Conservation & Emission Reduction, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100037, China)

  • Qianxi Song

    (Collaborative Innovation Center of Energy Conservation & Emission Reduction, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100037, China)

  • Wen Su

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Xinxing Lin

    (Institute of Science and Technology, China Three Gorges Corporation, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Zhi Sun

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand)

  • Zhisheng Huang

    (Collaborative Innovation Center of Energy Conservation & Emission Reduction, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100037, China)

  • Yaping Gao

    (Collaborative Innovation Center of Energy Conservation & Emission Reduction, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100037, China)

Abstract

As an efficient energy conversion technology, the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) has been widely applied in medium- and low-grade heat sources. In order to explore the experimental performance of ORC and reveal the effects of operation parameters, an experimental setup was built and R123 was selected as the working fluid. In the experiments, the heat source temperature as well as the mass flow rates of the working fluid and cooling water were controlled. Under the design conditions, the net work and cycle efficiency can, respectively, reach up to 0.55 kW and 8.7%. As for the influences of key parameters, with the increase in heat source temperature from 130 °C to 160 °C, the involved heat has a small increase, while the net work increases from 0.44 kW to 0.55 kW, and the cycle efficiency greatly increases from 6.71% to 8.72% at a mass flow rate of working fluid 25 g/s. As for the mass flow rate of cooling water, it has a similar impact on the cycle performances. The difference is that the effect of the cooling water rate is relatively smaller. At the mass flow rate 25 g/s, when the cooling water rate increases from 0.68 kg/s to 0.83 kg/s, the net work varies from 0.46 kW to 0.55 kW, the cycle efficiency increases in the range 7.41~9.4%. Furthermore, except cycle efficiency, all performances are proportional to the mass flow rate of working fluid. In the test range, the difference of cycle efficiency among different mass flow rates is less than 0.7%.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Gao & Qianxi Song & Wen Su & Xinxing Lin & Zhi Sun & Zhisheng Huang & Yaping Gao, 2023. "Experimentally Identifying the Influences of Key Parameters for an Organic Rankine Cycle Using R123," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:814-:d:1022862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/814/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/814/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Peng & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua, 2019. "How to approach optimal practical Organic Rankine cycle (OP-ORC) by configuration modification for diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 543-552.
    2. Li, Yung-Ming & Hung, Tzu-Chen & Wu, Chia-Jung & Su, Ting-Ying & Xi, Huan & Wang, Chi-Chuan, 2021. "Experimental investigation of 3-kW organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system subject to heat source conditions: A new appraisal for assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    4. Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Vandersickel, Annelies & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2016. "Experimental study of an ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) and analysis of R1233zd-E as a drop-in replacement for R245fa for low temperature heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 660-671.
    5. Zinsalo, Joël M. & Lamarche, Louis & Raymond, Jasmin, 2022. "Performance analysis and working fluid selection of an Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plant coupled to an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    7. Xinxing Lin & Chonghui Chen & Aofang Yu & Likun Yin & Wen Su, 2021. "Performance Comparison of Advanced Transcritical Power Cycles with High-Temperature Working Fluids for the Engine Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-32, September.
    8. Su, Wen & Zhao, Li & Deng, Shuai, 2017. "Simultaneous working fluids design and cycle optimization for Organic Rankine cycle using group contribution model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 618-627.
    9. Liu, Changwei & Gao, Tieyu, 2019. "Off-design performance analysis of basic ORC, ORC using zeotropic mixtures and composition-adjustable ORC under optimal control strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 95-108.
    10. Lin, Shan & Zhao, Li & Deng, Shuai & Ni, Jiaxin & Zhang, Ying & Ma, Minglu, 2019. "Dynamic performance investigation for two types of ORC system driven by waste heat of automotive internal combustion engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 958-971.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuozhuo Hu & Zhen Yang & Jian Li & Yuanyuan Duan, 2021. "A Review of Multi-Objective Optimization in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-36, October.
    2. Imran, Muhammad & Pili, Roberto & Usman, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik, 2020. "Dynamic modeling and control strategies of organic Rankine cycle systems: Methods and challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    3. Li, Jian & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Yang, Fubin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Thermo-economic analyses and evaluations of small-scale dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle system using pure fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    5. Woodland, Brandon J. & Ziviani, Davide & Braun, James E. & Groll, Eckhard A., 2020. "Considerations on alternative organic Rankine Cycle congurations for low-grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Davide Di Battista & Roberto Cipollone, 2023. "Waste Energy Recovery and Valorization in Internal Combustion Engines for Transportation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-28, April.
    7. Marcin Jankowski & Aleksandra Borsukiewicz, 2020. "A Novel Exergy Indicator for Maximizing Energy Utilization in Low-Temperature ORC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Li, Xiaoya & Xu, Bin & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Towards a novel holistic design of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems operating under heat source fluctuations and intermittency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    9. Zhang, Tao & Ma, Junhua & Zhou, Yanglin & Wang, Yongzhen & Chen, Qifang & Li, Xiaoping & Liu, Liuchen, 2021. "Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of ICE-ORC systems based on a splitter regulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    11. Xu, Bin & Rathod, Dhruvang & Yebi, Adamu & Filipi, Zoran & Onori, Simona & Hoffman, Mark, 2019. "A comprehensive review of organic rankine cycle waste heat recovery systems in heavy-duty diesel engine applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 145-170.
    12. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Toffolo, Andrea, 2018. "SYNTHSEP: A general methodology for the synthesis of energy system configurations beyond superstructures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 924-949.
    13. Liu, Liuchen & Zhu, Tong & Wang, Tiantian & Gao, Naiping, 2019. "Experimental investigation on the effect of working fluid charge in a small-scale Organic Rankine Cycle under off-design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 664-677.
    14. Hsieh, Jui-Ching & Chen, Yen-Hsun & Hsieh, Yi-Chi, 2023. "Experimental study of an organic Rankine cycle with a variable-rotational-speed scroll expander at various heat source temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    15. Li, Pengcheng & Cao, Qing & Li, Jing & Wang, Yandong & Pei, Gang & Gao, Cai & Zhao, Hongling & Liu, Xunfen, 2020. "Effect of regenerator on the direct steam generation solar power system characterized by prolonged thermal storage and stable power conversion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1099-1116.
    16. Ye, Zhenhong & Yang, Jingye & Shi, Junye & Chen, Jiangping, 2020. "Thermo-economic and environmental analysis of various low-GWP refrigerants in Organic Rankine cycle system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    17. Song, Panpan & Wei, Mingshan & Zhang, Yangjun & Sun, Liwei & Emhardt, Simon & Zhuge, Weilin, 2018. "The impact of a bilateral symmetric discharge structure on the performance of a scroll expander for ORC power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 458-470.
    18. White, M.T. & Oyewunmi, O.A. & Chatzopoulou, M.A. & Pantaleo, A.M. & Haslam, A.J. & Markides, C.N., 2018. "Computer-aided working-fluid design, thermodynamic optimisation and thermoeconomic assessment of ORC systems for waste-heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1181-1198.
    19. Li, Jian & Hu, Shuozhuo & Yang, Fubin & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Thermo-economic performance evaluation of emerging liquid-separated condensation method in single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    20. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Design and performance analyses for a novel organic Rankine cycle with supercritical-subcritical heat absorption process coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1400-1414.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:814-:d:1022862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.