IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v193y2020ics0360544219325058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations on alternative organic Rankine Cycle congurations for low-grade waste heat recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Woodland, Brandon J.
  • Ziviani, Davide
  • Braun, James E.
  • Groll, Eckhard A.

Abstract

When organic Rankine cycles (ORC) are employed to convert waste heat into work, the thermal efficiency is not recommended as a key performance metric because waste heat recovery and power output are not generally maximized at the point of peak efficiency. In such an application, maximization of the net power output should be the objective. Two alternative cycle configurations that can increase the net power output from a heat source with a given temperature and flow rate are analyzed and compared to a baseline ORC. These cycle configurations are: an ORC with two-phase flash expansion (TFC) and an ORC with a zeotropic working fluid mixture (ZRC). A design-stage ORC model allowed a consistent comparison of multiple ORC configurations with finite capacity of the source and heat sink fluids. Simulation results indicated that the TFC offered the most improvement over the baseline ORC, but required a highly efficient two-phase expansion. The ZRC shows improvement over the baseline as long as the condenser fan power requirement is not negligible. At the highest estimated condenser fan power, the TFC is no longer beneficial. Finally, a partial-evaporating ZRC (PE-ZRC) has also been considered to reduce the volume ratio requirements of a flash expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Woodland, Brandon J. & Ziviani, Davide & Braun, James E. & Groll, Eckhard A., 2020. "Considerations on alternative organic Rankine Cycle congurations for low-grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:193:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219325058
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219325058
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heberle, Florian & Preißinger, Markus & Brüggemann, Dieter, 2012. "Zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles for low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 364-370.
    2. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    3. Maraver, Daniel & Royo, Javier & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2014. "Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 11-29.
    4. Chys, M. & van den Broek, M. & Vanslambrouck, B. & De Paepe, M., 2012. "Potential of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 623-632.
    5. Zhao, Li & Bao, Junjiang, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 748-756.
    6. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    7. Miao, Zheng & Zhang, Kai & Wang, Mengxiao & Xu, Jinliang, 2019. "Thermodynamic selection criteria of zeotropic mixtures for subcritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 484-497.
    8. Satanphol, K. & Pridasawas, W. & Suphanit, B., 2017. "A study on optimal composition of zeotropic working fluid in an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for low grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 326-339.
    9. Ajimotokan, H.A. & Sher, I., 2015. "Thermodynamic performance simulation and design optimisation of trilateral-cycle engines for waste heat recovery-to-power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 26-34.
    10. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    11. Yari, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2015. "Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 712-722.
    12. Fischer, Johann, 2011. "Comparison of trilateral cycles and organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 6208-6219.
    13. Rattner, Alexander S. & Garimella, Srinivas, 2011. "Energy harvesting, reuse and upgrade to reduce primary energy usage in the USA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 6172-6183.
    14. van de Bor, D.M. & Infante Ferreira, C.A. & Kiss, Anton A., 2015. "Low grade waste heat recovery using heat pumps and power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 864-873.
    15. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    16. Zhai, Huixing & An, Qingsong & Shi, Lin & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 790-805.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meng, Dongyu & Liu, Qiang & Ji, Zhongli, 2022. "Effects of two-phase expander on the thermoeconomics of organic double-flash cycles for geothermal power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    2. Tan, Jingqi & Luo, Jiaqi & Huang, Jiale & Wei, Jianjian & Jin, Tao, 2020. "A closed two-phase thermofluidic oscillator with zeotropic mixtures for low-grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    3. Wang, Lili & Xia, Li & Li, Chengyun & Tian, Yuan & Teng, Junfeng & Sun, Xiaoyan & Xiang, Shuguang, 2023. "Exergy, economic, and exergoenvironmental analyses of new combined heat and power process based on mechanism analysis of working fluid screening," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    4. Wang, Lili & Zhao, Jun & Teng, Junfeng & Dong, Shilong & Wang, Yinglong & Xiang, Shuguang & Sun, Xiaoyan, 2022. "Study on an energy-saving process for separation ethylene elycol mixture through heat-pump, heat-integration and ORC driven by waste-heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2023. "Exergy efficiency potential of dual-phase expansion trilateral and partial evaporation ORC with zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    6. Gaylord Carrillo Caballero & Yulineth Cardenas Escorcia & Osvaldo José Venturini & Electo Eduardo Silva Lora & Anibal Alviz Meza & Luis Sebastián Mendoza Castellanos, 2023. "Unidimensional and 3D Analyses of a Radial Inflow Turbine for an Organic Rankine Cycle under Design and Off-Design Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-31, April.
    7. Feili, Milad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi & Ghaebi, Hadi, 2022. "Thermo-mechanical energy level approach integrated with exergoeconomic optimization for realistic cost evaluation of a novel micro-CCHP system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 630-657.
    8. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Fierro, José J. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Potential savings in the cement industry using waste heat recovery technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    9. Luo, Jiaqi & Zhou, Qiang & Jin, Tao, 2023. "Theoretical and experimental investigation of acoustic field adjustment of a gas-liquid standing-wave thermoacoustic engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    10. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    2. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Mikelis, Angelos & Charalampidis, Antonios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Exergetic performance of CO2 and ultra-low GWP refrigerant mixtures as working fluids in ORC for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Hærvig, J. & Sørensen, K. & Condra, T.J., 2016. "Guidelines for optimal selection of working fluid for an organic Rankine cycle in relation to waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 592-602.
    4. Hoang, Anh Tuan, 2018. "Waste heat recovery from diesel engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 138-166.
    5. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2023. "Exergy efficiency potential of dual-phase expansion trilateral and partial evaporation ORC with zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    6. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    7. Kajurek, Jakub & Rusowicz, Artur & Grzebielec, Andrzej & Bujalski, Wojciech & Futyma, Kamil & Rudowicz, Zbigniew, 2019. "Selection of refrigerants for a modified organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-8.
    8. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    9. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    10. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycle alternatives for the cement industry using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology and energy-economic-environmental (3E) analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    11. Miao, Zheng & Zhang, Kai & Wang, Mengxiao & Xu, Jinliang, 2019. "Thermodynamic selection criteria of zeotropic mixtures for subcritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 484-497.
    12. Li, Jian & Hu, Shuozhuo & Yang, Fubin & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Thermo-economic performance evaluation of emerging liquid-separated condensation method in single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    13. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Grispos, Victoras & Karellas, Sotirios, 2021. "Exergetic efficiency potential of double-stage ORCs with zeotropic mixtures of natural hydrocarbons and CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    14. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Effects of heat source temperature and mixture composition on the combined superiority of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle and zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 436-449.
    15. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    16. Satanphol, K. & Pridasawas, W. & Suphanit, B., 2017. "A study on optimal composition of zeotropic working fluid in an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for low grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 326-339.
    17. Schilling, J. & Entrup, M. & Hopp, M. & Gross, J. & Bardow, A., 2021. "Towards optimal mixtures of working fluids: Integrated design of processes and mixtures for Organic Rankine Cycles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Ziviani, D. & Gusev, S. & Lecompte, S. & Groll, E.A. & Braun, J.E. & Horton, W.T. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2017. "Optimizing the performance of small-scale organic Rankine cycle that utilizes a single-screw expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 416-432.
    19. Steven Lecompte & Oyeniyi A. Oyewunmi & Christos N. Markides & Marija Lazova & Alihan Kaya & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2017. "Case Study of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Waste Heat Recovery from an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S. & Deng, Shuai, 2020. "Towards novel low temperature thermodynamic cycle: A critical review originated from organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:193:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219325058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.