IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14264-d1248644.html

A DPSIR Framework to Evaluate and Predict the Development of Prefabricated Buildings: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Fanrong Ji

    (School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Zhaoyuan Luo

    (School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Xiancun Hu

    (School of Design and the Built Environment, University of Canberra, Canberra 2601, Australia)

  • Yunquan Nan

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Aifang Wei

    (School of Design and the Built Environment, University of Canberra, Canberra 2601, Australia)

Abstract

Prefabricated building construction is an important method of enhancing construction productivity and promoting sustainable development in the construction industry. Evaluating and predicting the development performance of prefabricated buildings will contribute to identifying and implementing the most effective responses to promote prefabricated building technologies. Based on the Drives–Pressures–States–Impacts–Responses (DPSIR) framework, 14 evaluation indexes are determined to evaluate the development level of prefabricated buildings. The entropy weight method was used to determine the weight of the evaluation index, and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method with improved grey correlation was applied to comprehensively evaluate the trend of the index. The grey model (GM(1,1)) was developed to predict the development trend of prefabricated buildings. The development of prefabricated buildings in Shandong province, China, is employed as a case to apply the developed method and investigate development experiences. The results demonstrate that the case has achieved significant progress and has great potential in promoting the use of prefabricated buildings. The development recommendations include developing a policy and regulation system, strengthening a prefabricated building talent pool, and enhancing the investment in technological innovation. This study innovatively formulated the evaluation and prediction system based on the DPSIR, TOPSIS and GM(1,1) models, which could be used for evaluating development performance between social and environmental factors among various cause-effect relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanrong Ji & Zhaoyuan Luo & Xiancun Hu & Yunquan Nan & Aifang Wei, 2023. "A DPSIR Framework to Evaluate and Predict the Development of Prefabricated Buildings: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14264-:d:1248644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yinghui Song & Junwu Wang & Feng Guo & Jiequn Lu & Sen Liu, 2021. "Research on Supplier Selection of Prefabricated Building Elements from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Chaofeng Shao & Xiaogang Tian & Yang Guan & Meiting Ju & Qiang Xie, 2013. "Development and Application of a New Grey Dynamic Hierarchy Analysis System (GDHAS) for Evaluating Urban Ecological Security," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Angeles, Luis, 2008. "GDP per capita or real wages? Making sense of conflicting views on pre-industrial Europe," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 147-163, April.
    4. He Wang & Yinqi Zhang & Weijun Gao & Soichiro Kuroki, 2020. "Life Cycle Environmental and Cost Performance of Prefabricated Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Shuyu Li & Rongrong Li, 2017. "Comparison of Forecasting Energy Consumption in Shandong, China Using the ARIMA Model, GM Model, and ARIMA-GM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Bartosz Radomski & Tomasz Mróz, 2021. "The Methodology for Designing Residential Buildings with a Positive Energy Balance—Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Cavoli, Clemence, 2021. "Accelerating sustainable mobility and land-use transitions in rapidly growing cities: Identifying common patterns and enabling factors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Bartosz Radomski & Tomasz Mróz, 2021. "The Methodology for Designing Residential Buildings with a Positive Energy Balance—General Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dolores Ordóñez-Martínez & Joana M. Seguí-Pons & Maurici Ruiz-Pérez, 2023. "Conceptual Framework and Prospective Analysis of EU Tourism Data Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-35, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Łukasz Amanowicz, 2021. "Peak Power of Heat Source for Domestic Hot Water Preparation (DHW) for Residential Estate in Poland as a Representative Case Study for the Climate of Central Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Smoczyk, Mateusz & Ksit, Barbara & Szymczak-Graczyk, Anna, 2025. "Numerical analysis of the ground temperature function depending on edge thermal insulation parameters for shallow slab foundations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    3. Anna Szymczak-Graczyk & Gabriela Gajewska & Ireneusz Laks & Wojciech Kostrzewski, 2022. "Influence of Variable Moisture Conditions on the Value of the Thermal Conductivity of Selected Insulation Materials Used in Passive Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Bartosz Radomski & Tomasz Mróz, 2023. "Application of the Hybrid MCDM Method for Energy Modernisation of an Existing Public Building—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. H.-Ping Tserng & Cheng-Mo Chou & Yun-Tsui Chang, 2021. "The Key Strategies to Implement Circular Economy in Building Projects—A Case Study of Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Tirthankar Roy, 2012. "Consumption Of Cotton Cloth In India, 1795–1940," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(1), pages 61-84, March.
    7. Qianqian Zhao & Junzhen Li & Roman Fediuk & Sergey Klyuev & Darya Nemova, 2021. "Benefit Evaluation Model of Prefabricated Buildings in Seasonally Frozen Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Mikolaj Malinowski, 2013. "East of Eden: Polish living standards in a European perspective, ca. 1500-1800," Working Papers 0043, Utrecht University, Centre for Global Economic History.
    9. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Daniels, Chux & AbdulRafiu, Abbas, 2022. "Transitioning to electrified, automated and shared mobility in an African context: A comparative review of Johannesburg, Kigali, Lagos and Nairobi," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Mark Koyama, 2009. "The Price of Time and Labour Supply: From the Black Death to the Industrious Revolution," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _078, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    11. Peng Zhang & Jinsong Hu & Kelong Zheng & Wenqing Wu & Xin Ma, 2025. "Forecasting Renewable Power Generation by Employing a Probabilistic Accumulation Non-Homogeneous Grey Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-33, September.
    12. Pruethsan Sutthichaimethee & Kuskana Kubaha, 2018. "The Efficiency of Long-Term Forecasting Model on Final Energy Consumption in Thailand’s Petroleum Industries Sector: Enriching the LT-ARIMAXS Model under a Sustainability Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Mihai Paunica & Alexandru Manole & Catalina Motofei & Gabriela-Lidia Tanase, 2021. "Resilience of the European Union Economies. An Analysis of the Granger Causality at the Level of the Gross Domestic Product," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(Special15), pages 914-914, November.
    14. López-Guerrero, Rafael E. & Vera, Sergio & Carpio, Manuel, 2022. "A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the sustainability of industrialised building systems: A bibliographic review and analysis of case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Stephen Broadberry & Bruce Campbell & Alexander Klein & Mark Overton & Bas van Leeuwen, 2012. "British Economic Growth, 1270-1870: an output-based approach," Studies in Economics 1203, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    16. Jie Ma & Amos Oppong & Kingsley Nketia Acheampong & Lucille Aba Abruquah, 2018. "Forecasting Renewable Energy Consumption under Zero Assumptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Muhammad Hamza & Rai Waqas Azfar & Khwaja Mateen Mazher & Basel Sultan & Ahsen Maqsoom & Shabir Hussain Khahro & Zubair Ahmed Memon, 2023. "Exploring Perceptions of the Adoption of Prefabricated Construction Technology in Pakistan Using the Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Mehdi Senouci, 2013. "Direction of technical change, endogenous fertility, and patterns of growth," Working Papers hal-01206021, HAL.
    19. Judy Stephenson, 2018. "Looking for work? Or looking for workers? Days and hours of work in London construction in the eighteenth century," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _162, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    20. Li Yang & Xue Wang & Junqi Zhu & Liyan Sun & Zhiyuan Qin, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Deep Coal Miners’ Unsafe Behavior Based on HFACS-CM-SEM-SD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-29, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14264-:d:1248644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.