IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14100-d1246117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Agroforestry Extension Workers’ Technical and Human Relation Competencies: A Ranked Discrepancy Model Needs Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Flanagan

    (Department of Agricultural Education and Communications, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
    Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communications, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Amy Boren-Alpizar

    (Department of Agricultural Education and Communications, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

  • Gary Wingenbach

    (Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communications, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • David Lawver

    (Department of Agricultural Education and Communications, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

  • Robert Strong

    (Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communications, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

Abstract

Increasingly, agroforestry is being promoted to smallholders as a method to adapt to and mitigate climate change while addressing socio-economic limitations. Promoting agroforestry practices requires organizations to have competent staff with requisite knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) for their roles. This study examined perceived competency training needs among international workers promoting agroforestry. A Ranked Discrepancy Model (RDM) was used to determine and prioritize the KSA training needs of agroforestry professionals in selected countries in the Global South. This study was conducted with a nonrandom snowball sample of 107 professionals who promote agroforestry to smallholder farmers. As a nonrandom sample, the results represent those who participated, and caution is warranted in generalizing. Agroforestry Extension professionals deemed all items as either average or important, and training gaps existed in all agroforestry KSAs; however, the most notable training gaps were in (a) agribusiness, and (b) pests and disease. The research provides insights into the training needs of agroforestry personnel promoting agroforestry to smallholders in selected areas across the Global South. This study contributes to the theory for both professional development researchers and practitioners with the inclusion of a Ranked Discrepancy Model.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Flanagan & Amy Boren-Alpizar & Gary Wingenbach & David Lawver & Robert Strong, 2023. "Evaluating Agroforestry Extension Workers’ Technical and Human Relation Competencies: A Ranked Discrepancy Model Needs Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14100-:d:1246117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodel D. Lasco & Rafaela Jane P. Delfino & Marya Laya O. Espaldon, 2014. "Agroforestry systems: helping smallholders adapt to climate risks while mitigating climate change," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(6), pages 825-833, November.
    2. Amare, Dagninet & Darr, Dietrich, 2020. "Agroforestry adoption as a systems concept: A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Hee-Jun Choi & Ji-Hye Park, 2022. "Exploring Deficiencies in the Professional Capabilities of Novice Practitioners to Reshape the Undergraduate Human Resource Development Curriculum in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Paige Seitz & Robert Strong & Steve Hague & Theresa P. Murphrey, 2022. "Evaluating Agricultural Extension Agent’s Sustainable Cotton Land Production Competencies: Subject Matter Discrepancies Restricting Farmers’ Information Adoption," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Strong & Sarah Sprayberry & Kim Dooley & Jaehyun Ahn & Jennifer Richards & Jim Kinsella & Chin-Ling Lee & Nicole Ray & Sarah Cardey & Carmen Benson & Andrea Ettekal, 2023. "Sustaining Global Food Systems with Youth Digital Livestock Production Curricula Interventions and Adoption to Professionally Develop Agents of Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Meine van Noordwijk & Richard Coe & Fergus L. Sinclair & Eike Luedeling & Jules Bayala & Catherine W. Muthuri & Peter Cooper & Roeland Kindt & Lalisa Duguma & Christine Lamanna & Peter A. Minang, 2021. "Climate change adaptation in and through agroforestry: four decades of research initiated by Peter Huxley," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1-33, June.
    3. Dallimer, Martin & Martin-Ortega, Julia & Rendon, Olivia & Afionis, Stavros & Bark, Rosalind & Gordon, Iain J. & Paavola, Jouni, 2020. "Taking stock of the empirical evidence on the insurance value of ecosystems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    5. Isabelle Chort & Berk Öktem, 2024. "Agricultural shocks, coping policies and deforestation: Evidence from the coffee leaf rust epidemic in Mexico," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(3), pages 1020-1057, May.
    6. Zabala, Aiora & Barrios, Luis Enrique García & Pascual, Unai, 2022. "From participation to commitment in silvopastoral programmes: Insights from Chiapas, Mexico," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Julia Ihli, Hanna & Chiputwa, Brian & Winter, Etti & Gassner, Anja, 2022. "Risk and time preferences for participating in forest landscape restoration: The case of coffee farmers in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Bhuvnesh Nagar & Sushma Rawat & Rajiv Pandey & Munesh Kumar & Juha M. Alatalo, 2022. "Fuelwood and fodder consumption patterns among agroforestry-practicing smallholder farmers of the lower Himalayas, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5594-5613, April.
    9. Abyiot Teklu & Belay Simane & Mintewab Bezabih, 2022. "Effectiveness of Climate-Smart Agriculture Innovations in Smallholder Agriculture System in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Amare, Dagninet & Darr, Dietrich, 2023. "Can a sequential analysis provide a more robust understanding of farmers' adoption decisions? An example from an agroforestry adoption study in Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Davila, Federico & Bourke, R.M. & McWilliam, Andrew & Crimp, Steven & Robins, Lisa & van Wensveen, Monica & Alders, Robyn G. & Butler, James R.A., 2021. "COVID-19 and food systems in Pacific Island Countries, Papua New Guinea, and Timor-Leste: Opportunities for actions towards the sustainable development goals," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Shahzad Ahmad & Haiping Xu & E. M. B. P. Ekanayake, 2023. "Socioeconomic Determinants and Perceptions of Smallholder Farmers towards Agroforestry Adoption in Northern Irrigated Plain, Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14100-:d:1246117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.