IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13958-d1243943.html

The Diversity of Environmental, Social, and Governance Aspects in Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Attila Jámbor

    (Institute of Sustainable Development, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, 1093 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Anett Zanócz

    (Department of Accounting, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, 1093 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Significant emphasis has recently been placed on measuring companies from a sustainability perspective by environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores, resulting in a considerable amount of financial, accounting, business, and management research on the subject. We provide a concise and harmonized systematic literature review of the current trends within this area for a broader range of academic researchers and practitioners. This work comprehensively explains ESG ratings, scores, and reports and aims to summarize how CSR activities are accounted for as non-financial information. The review aims to provide information and a better understanding of the complexity of corporate ESG aspects for those interested in this area. The results suggest that diverse methodologies, subjective elements, and some complexity of ESG measurement exist, leading to companies unconsciously using ESG ratings based on incorrect measures. Scoring methodologies are controversial, highlighting the need for more certainty about the validity of the ratings. ESG ratings need more reliability, and ESG reports do not help increase credibility, transparency, or accountability. Greenwashing emerges from loose regulation, measurement complexity, and the absence of transparency, emphasizing the need for more auditing and regulations in sustainability reporting and rating. Our results also demonstrate that ESG reporting is an ever-growing issue in sustainability and finances, and regulators must focus on it. Inconsistencies and uncertainties exist in ESG ratings and reporting; therefore, education is needed for decision-makers to understand better how this emerging topic works in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Attila Jámbor & Anett Zanócz, 2023. "The Diversity of Environmental, Social, and Governance Aspects in Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13958-:d:1243943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13958/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13958/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bofinger, Yannik & Heyden, Kim J. & Rock, Björn, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility and market efficiency: Evidence from ESG and misvaluation measures," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Mansi Jain & Gagan Deep Sharma & Mrinalini Srivastava, 2019. "Can Sustainable Investment Yield Better Financial Returns: A Comparative Study of ESG Indices and MSCI Indices," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Jieun Chung & Charles H. Cho, 2018. "Current Trends within Social and Environmental Accounting Research: A Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 207-239, June.
    4. Rezaee, Zabihollah & Homayoun, Saeid & Poursoleyman, Ehsan & Rezaee, Nick J., 2023. "Comparative analysis of environmental, social, and governance disclosures," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    5. Céline LOUCHE & Guillaume DELAUTRE & Gabriela BALVEDI PIMENTEL, 2023. "Assessing companies' decent work practices: An analysis of ESG rating methodologies," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(1), pages 69-97, March.
    6. Rocío Redondo Alamillos & Frédéric de Mariz, 2022. "How Can European Regulation on ESG Impact Business Globally?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Maha Faisal Alsayegh, 2021. "Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corinna Irina Ketterling, 2026. "From voluntary CSR to binding ESG frameworks: a legal perspective on sustainability disclosure standards," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Ion FRECAUTAN & Andreea NITA (DANILA), 2022. "Who Is Going To Win: The Eu Esg Regulation Or The Rest Of The World? €“ A Critical Review," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2(2), pages 109-120, December.
    3. Sheeba Kapil & Vrinda Rawal, 2023. "Sustainable investment and environmental, social, and governance investing: A bibliometric and systematic literature review," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 1429-1451, October.
    4. Maria Krambia-Kapardis & Christos S. Savva & Ioanna Stylianou, 2023. "Socio-Economic Factors Affecting ESG Reporting Call for Globally Agreed Standards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-35, October.
    5. Anrafel de Souza Barbosa & Maria Cristina Crispim & Luiz Bueno da Silva & Jonhatan Magno Norte da Silva & Aglaucibelly Maciel Barbosa & Sandra Naomi Morioka, 2024. "How can organizations measure the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria? Validation of an instrument using item response theory to capture workers' perception," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3607-3634, May.
    6. Wang, Mingke & Wei, Weixian, 2025. "Modeling the economic and environmental effects of ESG preferences: A general equilibrium approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. van Weeren, Michelle & Bluntz, Clarence, 2025. "What makes a rating useable? Shifting epistemic practices in the ESG rating field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    8. Xueying Yuan & Lixia Shang & Jinhua Xu, 2024. "Green Financial Policy, Resource Allocation and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, July.
    9. Xinhong WANG & Taiwen KONG, 2025. "Internal control quality, dynamic capabilities, and executive team diversity: mechanisms behind corporate digital transformation," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Charles H. Cho & Kathrin Bohr & Tony Jaehyun Choi & Katharine Partridge & Jhankrut Mukesh Shah & Ada Swierszcz, 2020. "Advancing Sustainability Reporting in Canada: 2019 Report on Progress," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 181-204, September.
    11. Richard Yeaw Chong Seow, 2024. "Determinants of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2314-2330, March.
    12. Simran Gupta & Vaishali & Rahul Kumar, 2025. "Which ownership structure will sustain sustainability? An empirical examination of ESG disclosure," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 759-775, September.
    13. Neenu. C & T Mohamed Nishad, 2021. "Carbon Reduction and Sustainable Investment: A Way to Sustainable Development," Energy Economics Letters, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(2), pages 134-144, December.
    14. Md Ismail Haidar, 2025. "Does Societal Trust Reduce Greenwashing? International Evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 3400-3424, March.
    15. Norhayati Sulaiman & Sunarti Halid & Noor Saatila Mohd Isa & Norliana Omar & Rahayu Abdul Rahman, 2025. "Financial Performance as a Driver of ESG Disclosure: Evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 3527-3534, January.
    16. Marek Walacik & Aneta Chmielewska, 2024. "Energy Performance in Residential Buildings as a Property Market Efficiency Driver," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Julio Hernández Pajares & Yulliana Llauce Ontaneda & Macarena Mansilla Mahmud, 2024. "Factores de cumplimiento de reportes de sostenibilidad corporativa: un estudio de datos de panel de empresas cotizadas en Perú," The Anahuac Journal, Business and Economics School. Anahuac University (Mexico)., vol. 24(1), pages 64-91, June.
    18. José Luis Miralles-Quirós & María Mar Miralles-Quirós & José Manuel Nogueira, 2020. "Sustainable Development Goals and Investment Strategies: The Profitability of Using Five-Factor Fama-French Alphas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Angus W. H. Yip & William Y. P. Yu, 2023. "The Quality of Environmental KPI Disclosure in ESG Reporting for SMEs in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Edna Aparecida Greggio Possebon & Felippe Aparecido Cippiciani & José Roberto Ferreira Savoia & Frédéric de Mariz, 2024. "ESG Scores and Performance in Brazilian Public Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13958-:d:1243943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.