IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i9p503-d1746990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESG Strategy and Tax Avoidance: Insights from a Meta-Regression Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Mitroulia

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Ioannina, 48100 Preveza, Greece)

  • Evangelos Chytis

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Ioannina, 48100 Preveza, Greece)

  • Thomas Kitsantas

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Ioannina, 48100 Preveza, Greece)

  • Michalis Skordoulis

    (Department of Tourism Management, University of West Attica, 12244 Athens, Greece)

  • Petros Kalantonis

    (Department of Tourism Management, University of West Attica, 12244 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

This research examines the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria and tax behavior, with a particular focus on tax avoidance (TA). Despite the extensive literature on ESG and tax behavior, there remains a research gap concerning their interaction in the financial sector. The study is based on a dataset of 125 observations from 33 articles covering the period 2012–2023. The results of the meta-regression suggest that both ESG and TA indicators account for the different findings of the primary studies. Part of the observed heterogeneity can also be explained by the diversity of data samples and econometric approaches. Using the results of the meta-regression, we attempt to predict the association between ESG and TA in hypothetical and plausible study designs. The findings show no or small-to-moderate association between the two, suggesting that companies tend to separate ESG strategies from TA and underscoring the need for more consistent measurement practices. Notably, the link between the main variables appears to be strengthened in environments with extreme behaviors, both in terms of ESG and tax strategy. Distinct from prior meta-studies that centered on CSR and taxation, our analysis isolates the ESG/TA nexus by accounting for measurement heterogeneity (different ESG and TA proxies) and demonstrates that extreme behaviors largely drive the observed association. By examining the determinants of the heterogeneity of primary research into the ESG/TA relationship, this meta-analysis provides valuable insights that can guide future research, practical implementation, and regulatory policies. In particular, researchers should rely on long-run measures of TA (e.g., multi-year ETRs) and harmonized ESG indicators to reduce bias and enhance comparability across studies, thereby providing policymakers with more robust and consistent evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Mitroulia & Evangelos Chytis & Thomas Kitsantas & Michalis Skordoulis & Petros Kalantonis, 2025. "ESG Strategy and Tax Avoidance: Insights from a Meta-Regression Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-34, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:503-:d:1746990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/503/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/503/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Shuping & Chen, Xia & Cheng, Qiang & Shevlin, Terry, 2010. "Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 41-61, January.
    2. Mohammad Azzam & Alaa AlQudah & Ayman Abu Haija & Mohammad Shakhatreh, 2020. "The association between sustainability disclosures and the financial performance of Jordanian firms," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1859437-185, January.
    3. Jennifer Blouin, 2014. "Defining and Measuring Tax Planning Aggressiveness," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 67(4), pages 875-900, December.
    4. Rocío Redondo Alamillos & Frédéric de Mariz, 2022. "How Can European Regulation on ESG Impact Business Globally?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Michael Overesch & Johannes Rincke, 2011. "What Drives Corporate Tax Rates Down? A Reassessment of Globalization, Tax Competition, and Dynamic Adjustment to Shocks," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 113(3), pages 579-602, September.
    6. Ahmed Saber Moussa & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Doaa Shohaieb, 2024. "Green Governance: How ESG Initiatives Drive Financial Performance in UK Firms?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-25, December.
    7. M.A. Gulzar & Jacob Cherian & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Alina Badulescu & Phung Anh Thu & Daniel Badulescu & Nguyen Vinh Khuong, 2018. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Corporate Tax Avoidance of Chinese Listed Companies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Fallan, Even & Fallan, Lars, 2019. "Corporate tax behaviour and environmental disclosure: Strategic trade-offs across elements of CSR?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnes Aurora Ngelo & Yani Permatasari & Iman Harymawan & Nadia Anridho & Khairul Anuar Kamarudin, 2022. "Corporate Tax Avoidance and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from the Enforcement of Tax Amnesty in Indonesia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Han, Xiaomei & Wang, Jie & Cheng, Hanxiu, 2021. "The effect of corporate tax avoidance on salary distribution——Empirical evidence from publicly listed companies in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Cristi A. Gleason & Sascha Kieback & Martin Thomsen & Christoph Watrin, 2021. "Monitoring or payroll maximization? What happens when workers enter the boardroom?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1046-1087, September.
    4. (DJ) Fairhurst, Douglas & Liu, Yanguang & Ni, Xiaoran, 2020. "Employment protection and tax aggressiveness: Evidence from wrongful discharge laws," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Elisabeth Bustos-Contell & Salvador Climent-Serrano & Gregorio Labatut-Serer, 2017. "Offshoring in the European Union: a Study of the Evolution of the Tax Burden," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 11(2), June.
    6. Osman Issah & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness: A Scientometric Analysis of the Existing Literature to Map the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Lee, Cheng-Hsun & Bose, Sudipta, 2021. "Do family firms engage in less tax avoidance than non-family firms? The corporate opacity perspective," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    8. Luca Menicacci & Lorenzo Simoni, 2024. "Negative media coverage of ESG issues and corporate tax avoidance," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(7), pages 1-33, February.
    9. Kovermann, Jost & Velte, Patrick, 2019. "The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance—A literature review," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    10. He, Yuhan & Yi, Yang, 2023. "Digitalization of tax administration and corporate performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Dain C. Donelson & Jennifer L. Glenn & Christopher G. Yust, 2022. "Is tax aggressiveness associated with tax litigation risk? Evidence from D&O Insurance," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 519-569, June.
    12. Chen, Jie & Mishra, Tapas & Song, Wei & Zhang, Qingjing & Zhang, Zhuang, 2024. "The impact of bank mergers on corporate tax aggressiveness," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Blaufus, Kay & Bock, Julian & Peuthert, Benjamin, 2025. "What drives the use of aggressive conforming and nonconforming tax avoidance strategies? New evidence on the tax strategies' substitutive relationship," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 296, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    14. Elena Fernández-Rodríguez & Roberto García-Fernández & Antonio Martínez-Arias, 2019. "Influence of Ownership Structure on the Determinants of Effective Tax Rates of Spanish Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Dane M. Christensen & David G. Kenchington & Rick C. Laux, 2022. "How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 570-606, June.
    16. Simon Loretz & Padraig Moore, 2013. "Corporate tax competition between firms," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(5), pages 725-752, October.
    17. Valentino Parisi & Daniela Federici, 2023. "Family Firms’ Aggressive Tax Planning: An Empirical Evaluation for Italy," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 9(3), pages 1299-1327, November.
    18. Tânia Menezes Montenegro, 2021. "Tax Evasion, Corporate Social Responsibility and National Governance: A Country-Level Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Christofer Adrian & Mukesh Garg & Anh Viet Pham & Soon-Yeow Phang & Cameron Truong, 2023. "Do Natural Disasters Affect Corporate Tax Avoidance? The Case of Drought," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 105-135, August.
    20. Andrew M. Bauer & Junxiong Fang & Jeffrey Pittman & Yinqi Zhang & Yuping Zhao, 2020. "How Aggressive Tax Planning Facilitates the Diversion of Corporate Resources: Evidence from Path Analysis†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1882-1913, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:503-:d:1746990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.