IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13461-d1235566.html

The Estimation of the Correlation between GHG and the Technical Efficiency of Korean Short-Sea Ports

Author

Listed:
  • Young-Gyun Ahn

    (Maritime Policy Research Division, Korea Maritime Institute, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 49111, Republic of Korea)

  • Bo-Ram Kim

    (Maritime Industry Research Division, Korea Maritime Institute, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 49111, Republic of Korea)

  • Han-Seon Park

    (Maritime Industry Research Division, Korea Maritime Institute, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 49111, Republic of Korea)

  • Min-Kyu Lee

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Pukyong National University, Nam-Gu, Busan 48547, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Short-sea ports in Korea are classified as national or local according to their management and operation entities. Korea has 29 ports, of which 11 are nationally managed and 18 are locally managed. Meanwhile, according to Korea’s Harbor Act, short-sea ports are designed to support the promotion of benefits such as handling cargo required for local industries, transportation of passengers, and revitalization of tourism. However, even though they are designated as short-sea ports, there are cases in which the initial designation purpose was not achieved because of the minor traffic volume and number of passengers. Consequently, this study evaluated the operational efficiency of 29 Korean short-sea ports employing the data envelopment analysis (DEA) and presented the operational efficiency of 29 short-sea ports. Moreover, the study measured the correlation between greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the port operation efficiency of 29 Korean short-sea ports. The analysis results of this study are as follows: First, the correlation between port-operation efficiency and sulfur dioxide was −0.41707. Second, the correlation between efficiency and carbon monoxide was −0.39952. Third, the correlation between efficiency and nitrogen dioxide was −0.30888. In summary, this study concludes that the higher the port-operational efficiency, the lower the GHG emissions. Improving the operational efficiency of ports can reduce GHG emissions, which can positively (+) affect port sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Young-Gyun Ahn & Bo-Ram Kim & Han-Seon Park & Min-Kyu Lee, 2023. "The Estimation of the Correlation between GHG and the Technical Efficiency of Korean Short-Sea Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13461-:d:1235566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13461/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13461/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anastasia Christodoulou & Zeeshan Raza & Johan Woxenius, 2019. "The Integration of RoRo Shipping in Sustainable Intermodal Transport Chains: The Case of a North European RoRo Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Wanke, Peter F., 2013. "Physical infrastructure and shipment consolidation efficiency drivers in Brazilian ports: A two-stage network-DEA approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 145-153.
    3. Sun, Jiasen & Yuan, Yang & Yang, Rui & Ji, Xiang & Wu, Jie, 2017. "Performance evaluation of Chinese port enterprises under significant environmental concerns: An extended DEA-based analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 75-86.
    4. Antonio Comi & Antonio Polimeni, 2020. "Assessing the Potential of Short Sea Shipping and the Benefits in Terms of External Costs: Application to the Mediterranean Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evelin Krmac & Mozhgan Mansouri Kaleibar, 2023. "A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology in port efficiency evaluation," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(4), pages 817-881, December.
    2. Chia-Nan Wang & Phi-Hung Nguyen & Thi-Ly Nguyen & Thi-Giang Nguyen & Duc-Thinh Nguyen & Thi-Hoai Tran & Hong-Cham Le & Huong-Thuy Phung, 2022. "A Two-Stage DEA Approach to Measure Operational Efficiency in Vietnam’s Port Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Min Wang & Huayu Li & Yung-ho Chiu & Kexin Deng & Menghua Deng, 2023. "Research on the Carbon Emission Reduction Potential of the Ports in the Yangtze River Delta of China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    4. Evelin Krmac & Boban Djordjević, 2024. "Port environmental efficiency assessment using the one-stage and two-stage model DEA: comparison of Koper and Dublin ports," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 10397-10427, April.
    5. Zhang, Jing & Yang, Dong & Luo, Meifeng, 2024. "Port efficiency types and perspectives: A literature review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 13-24.
    6. Li, Sujuan & Liu, Jiaguo & Kong, Yudan, 2021. "Pilot free trade zones and Chinese port-listed companies performance: An empirical research based on quasi-natural experiment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 125-137.
    7. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2019. "An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process—Slack Based Measure-Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Logistics Service Providers Considering Undesirable Performance Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Renata Machado de Andrade & Suhyung Lee & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Oh Kyoung Kwon & Hye Min Chung, 2019. "Port Efficiency Incorporating Service Measurement Variables by the BiO-MCDEA: Brazilian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Zhang, Yang & Guan, Jinping & Jing, Peiyu & You, Linlin & Zhao, Fang & Ben‑Akiva, Moshe, 2026. "Future freight and logistics survey: An integrated vehicle-and-shipment-tracking data collection method and a case study in the United States," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    10. Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris & Despotis, Dimitris K. & Kritikos, Manolis N., 2022. "Fair efficiency decomposition in network DEA: A compromise programming approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Min Wang & Meng Ji & Xiaofen Wu & Kexin Deng & Xiaodong Jing, 2023. "Analysis on Evaluation and Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Port Cluster Eco-Efficiency: Case Study from the Yangtze River Delta in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    12. Krüger, Stephan & Marius Schulze, Marius & Jahn, Carlos, 2022. "Potential of container terminal operations for RoRo terminals," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 591-613, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    13. Gong, Xiaoxing & Wu, Xiaofan & Luo, Meifeng, 2019. "Company performance and environmental efficiency: A case study for shipping enterprises," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 96-106.
    14. Xiaohong Liu & Feng Yang & Jie Wu, 2020. "DEA considering technological heterogeneity and intermediate output target setting: the performance analysis of Chinese commercial banks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 605-626, August.
    15. Stephen Okyere & Jiaqi Yang & Charles Anum Adams, 2022. "Optimizing the Sustainable Multimodal Freight Transport and Logistics System Based on the Genetic Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Chen, Yang & Yang, Dong & Lian, Peng & Wan, Zheng & Yang, Yubin, 2020. "Will structure-environment-fit result in better port performance? —An empirical test on the validity of Matching Framework Theory," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 23-33.
    17. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2019. "Planning an Intermodal Terminal for the Sustainable Transport Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Ngo, Thuong-Truyet & Huynh, Nguyen Tan & Yang, Ching-Chiao, 2026. "A sequential approach to airport efficiency evaluation: Integrating two-stage DEA and truncated regression," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    19. Linlin Cui & Long Chen & Xiao Yang, 2024. "Evaluation and analysis of green efficiency of China's coastal ports under the "double carbon" goal: two improved DEA models with CO2 emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29099-29128, November.
    20. Ferreira, Diogo Cunha & Marques, Rui Cunha & Pedro, Maria Isabel, 2016. "Comparing efficiency of holding business model and individual management model of airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 168-183.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13461-:d:1235566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.