IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13094-d1229397.html

Analyzing Takeaway E-Bikers’ Risky Riding Behaviors and Formation Mechanism at Urban Intersections with the Structural Equation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaofei Ye

    (Ningbo Port Trade Cooperation and Development Collaborative Innovation Center, Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Fenghua Road 818#, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Yijie Hu

    (Ningbo Port Trade Cooperation and Development Collaborative Innovation Center, Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Fenghua Road 818#, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Lining Liu

    (Ningbo Port Trade Cooperation and Development Collaborative Innovation Center, Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Fenghua Road 818#, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Tao Wang

    (School of Architecture and Transportation, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Lingjinji Road 1#, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Xingchen Yan

    (College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Longpan Road 159#, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Jun Chen

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Si Pai Lou 2#, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

To study the internal formation mechanisms of risky riding behaviors of takeaway e-bikers at urban intersections, we designed a takeaway riding risky behavior questionnaire and obtained 605 valid samples. An exploratory factor analysis was then conducted to extract five scales: individual characteristics, safety attitude, riding confidence, risk perception, and risky riding behavior. On this basis, a structural equation model was constructed to explore the intrinsic causal relationships among the variables that affect the risky riding behaviors of takeaway e-bikers. The results show that the influence of incentive compensation driven by the takeaway platform was the greatest one. Takeaway riders tend to fight against time to improve punctuality and income by red-light running and speeding. They usually need to pay attention to order information and the delivery routes and communicate with customers to pick up meals in real-time, which inevitably lead to the use of cell phone while riding. Road factors such as “no turnaround at the intersection” and “no non-isolation facilities between on-motorized and motorized lane” lead riders to riding against the traffic, riding on the motor lane, and parking outside the stop line. In addition, lax traffic regulations lead to frequent loopholes for takeaway riders. It means that improving the takeaway platform system, strengthening traffic safety education, and adopting mandatory restraint measures are extremely important. The empirical results provide theoretical support for the benign and healthy development of the takeaway industry, which is significant for preventing and reducing risky behaviors of takeaway riders and improving safety at urban intersections.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaofei Ye & Yijie Hu & Lining Liu & Tao Wang & Xingchen Yan & Jun Chen, 2023. "Analyzing Takeaway E-Bikers’ Risky Riding Behaviors and Formation Mechanism at Urban Intersections with the Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13094-:d:1229397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golob, Thomas F., 2003. "Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zihao Zhang & Chenhui Liu, 2023. "Exploration of Riding Behaviors of Food Delivery Riders: A Naturalistic Cycling Study in Changsha, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vredin Johansson, Maria & Heldt, Tobias & Johansson, Per, 2006. "The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 507-525, July.
    2. Najaf, Pooya & Thill, Jean-Claude & Zhang, Wenjia & Fields, Milton Greg, 2018. "City-level urban form and traffic safety: A structural equation modeling analysis of direct and indirect effects," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 257-270.
    3. Ding, Yu & Lu, Huapu, 2016. "Activity participation as a mediating variable to analyze the effect of land use on travel behavior: A structural equation modeling approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 23-28.
    4. Scheiner, Joachim, 2010. "Social inequalities in travel behaviour: trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 679-690.
    5. Jara-Díaz, Sergio & Rosales-Salas, Jorge, 2017. "Beyond transport time: A review of time use modeling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 209-230.
    6. Kroesen, Maarten & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Understanding how accessibility influences health via active travel: Results from a structural equation model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Weis, Claude & Axhausen, Kay W., 2009. "Induced travel demand: Evidence from a pseudo panel data based structural equations model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 8-18.
    8. Toktaş-Palut, Peral & Baylav, Ecem & Teoman, Seyhan & Altunbey, Mustafa, 2014. "The impact of barriers and benefits of e-procurement on its adoption decision: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 77-90.
    9. Machado-León, José Luis & de Oña, Rocío & de Oña, Juan, 2016. "The role of involvement in regards to public transit riders' perceptions of the service," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 34-44.
    10. Golob, Thomas F. & Recker, Wilfred W. & Alvarez, Veronica M., 2004. "Safety aspects of freeway weaving sections," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 35-51, January.
    11. Nik Aida Suria Nik Zulkifli Ami & Rosadah Abd Majid & Mohd Hanafi Mohd Yasin, 2016. "Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Self-efficacy Instrument among Special Education Teachers," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 172-172, February.
    12. Silva, Mafalda C. & Horta, Isabel M. & Leal, Vítor & Oliveira, Vítor, 2017. "A spatially-explicit methodological framework based on neural networks to assess the effect of urban form on energy demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 386-398.
    13. Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj & Ratanavaraha, Vatanavongs, 2016. "Measurement modelling of the perceived service quality of a sightseeing bus service: An application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 240-252.
    14. Junyi Zhang & Lili Xu & Akimasa Fujiwara, 2012. "Developing an integrated scobit-based activity participation and time allocation model to explore influence of childcare on women’s time use behaviour," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 125-149, January.
    15. Jain, Vineet & Raj, Tilak, 2016. "Modeling and analysis of FMS performance variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 84-96.
    16. Mathieu Ouimet & Nabil Amara & Réjean Landry & John Lavis, 2007. "Direct interactions medical school faculty members have with professionals and managers working in public and private sector organizations: A cross-sectional study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 72(2), pages 307-323, August.
    17. de Abreu e Silva, João & Morency, Catherine & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2012. "Using structural equations modeling to unravel the influence of land use patterns on travel behavior of workers in Montreal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1252-1264.
    18. Syyed Adnan Raheel Shah & Naveed Ahmad & Yongjun Shen & Ali Pirdavani & Muhammad Aamir Basheer & Tom Brijs, 2018. "Road Safety Risk Assessment: An Analysis of Transport Policy and Management for Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-30, February.
    19. David Ory & Patricia Mokhtarian, 2010. "The impact of non-normality, sample size and estimation technique on goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation modeling: evidence from ten empirical models of travel behavior," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 427-445, April.
    20. Junya Kumagai & Mihoko Wakamatsu & Shunsuke Managi, 2021. "Do commuters adapt to in-vehicle crowding on trains?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2357-2399, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13094-:d:1229397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.