IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13023-d1228198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Integration of Shared Autonomous Vehicles in Public Transportation Services: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Filippo Carrese

    (DICEA, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Simone Sportiello

    (Department of Enterprise Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Tolegen Zhaksylykov

    (Faculty of Technology and Innovation, Universitas Mercatorum, 00186 Rome, Italy)

  • Chiara Colombaroni

    (DICEA, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Stefano Carrese

    (Department of Civil, Computer Science and Aeronautical Engineering, Roma Tre University, 00146 Rome, Italy)

  • Muzio Papaveri

    (Conerobus S.p.A., 60125 Ancona, Italy)

  • Sergio Maria Patella

    (Faculty of Technology and Innovation, Universitas Mercatorum, 00186 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles and shared mobility represent two fields of strong innovation in transportation research, and Shared Autonomous Vehicle (SAV) services have been studied as a new promising mobility system. Such services offer a strong potential especially when integrated with the Public Transport (PT) system, increasing its attractiveness by providing first- and last-mile connections to low-demand areas. This paper performs a systematic review on a niche of SAV-related literature, selecting articles that address PT-SAV integrations, the issue of how SAVs should be implemented together with already existing transit systems to enhance collective mobility. Papers have been classified firstly according to the methodological and modelling approaches used by researchers, and then according to the different operational schemes with which SAV systems can be deployed. Common findings have been reported and commented on, identifying the lack of articles aimed at determining the most suitable SAV service typology for specific contexts and network configuration. Many authors indicate that if SAVs are operated as feeder modes to mass transit, they might improve public transport connectivity. However, further research is needed to explore the efficacy of SAV systems as an opportunity to address first/last-mile PT planning issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Filippo Carrese & Simone Sportiello & Tolegen Zhaksylykov & Chiara Colombaroni & Stefano Carrese & Muzio Papaveri & Sergio Maria Patella, 2023. "The Integration of Shared Autonomous Vehicles in Public Transportation Services: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13023-:d:1228198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13023/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13023/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yefang Zhou & Yanyan Li & Mingyang Hao & Toshiyuki Yamamoto, 2019. "A System of Shared Autonomous Vehicles Combined with Park-And-Ride in Residential Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Shen, Yu & Zhang, Hongmou & Zhao, Jinhua, 2018. "Integrating shared autonomous vehicle in public transportation system: A supply-side simulation of the first-mile service in Singapore," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 125-136.
    3. Levin, Michael W., 2022. "A general maximum-stability dispatch policy for shared autonomous vehicle dispatch with an analytical characterization of the maximum throughput," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 258-280.
    4. Fraedrich, Eva & Heinrichs, Dirk & Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J. & Cyganski, Rita, 2019. "Autonomous driving, the built environment and policy implications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 162-172.
    5. Yap, Menno D. & Correia, Gonçalo & van Arem, Bart, 2016. "Preferences of travellers for using automated vehicles as last mile public transport of multimodal train trips," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-16.
    6. Iva Bojic & Dániel Kondor & Wei Tu & Ke Mai & Paolo Santi & Carlo Ratti, 2021. "Identifying the Potential for Partial Integration of Private and Public Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Laura Heubeck & Franziska Hartwich & Franziska Bocklisch, 2023. "To Share or Not to Share—Expected Transportation Mode Changes Given Different Types of Fully Automated Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinyu Zhao & Lu Xiong & Guirong Zhuo & Wei Tian & Jing Li & Qiang Shu & Xuanbai Zhao & Guodong Xu, 2024. "A Review of One-Box Electro-Hydraulic Braking System: Architecture, Control, and Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-31, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manivasakan, Hesavar & Kalra, Riddhi & O'Hern, Steve & Fang, Yihai & Xi, Yinfei & Zheng, Nan, 2021. "Infrastructure requirement for autonomous vehicle integration for future urban and suburban roads – Current practice and a case study of Melbourne, Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 36-53.
    2. Tang, Zhe-Yi & Tian, Li-Jun & Wang, David Z.W., 2021. "Multi-modal morning commute with endogenous shared autonomous vehicle penetration considering parking space constraint," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    3. Wang, Senlei & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Lin, Hai Xiang, 2022. "Modeling the competition between multiple Automated Mobility on-Demand operators: An agent-based approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 605(C).
    4. Ziakopoulos, Apostolos & Oikonomou, Maria G. & Vlahogianni, Eleni I. & Yannis, George, 2021. "Quantifying the implementation impacts of a point to point automated urban shuttle service in a large-scale network," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 233-244.
    5. Peng Jing & Hao Huang & Bin Ran & Fengping Zhan & Yuji Shi, 2019. "Exploring the Factors Affecting Mode Choice Intention of Autonomous Vehicle Based on an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior—A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Gu, Yewen & Goez, Julio C. & Mario, Guajardo & Wallace, Stein W., 2019. "Autonomous vessels: State of the art and potential opportunities in logistics," Discussion Papers 2019/6, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    7. Dannemiller, Katherine A. & Mondal, Aupal & Asmussen, Katherine E. & Bhat, Chandra R., 2021. "Investigating autonomous vehicle impacts on individual activity-travel behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 402-422.
    8. Cortina, Mélanie & Chiabaut, Nicolas & Leclercq, Ludovic, 2023. "Fostering synergy between transit and Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand systems: A dynamic modeling approach for the morning commute problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Sungwon Lee & Devon Farmer & Jooyoung Kim & Hyun Kim, 2022. "Shared Autonomous Vehicles Competing with Shared Electric Bicycles: A Stated-Preference Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Yefang Zhou & Hitomi Sato & Toshiyuki Yamamoto, 2021. "Shared Low-Speed Autonomous Vehicle System for Suburban Residential Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Baichuan Mo & Zhejing Cao & Hongmou Zhang & Yu Shen & Jinhua Zhao, 2020. "Competition between shared autonomous vehicles and public transit: A case study in Singapore," Papers 2001.03197, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    12. Matthias N. Sweet & Kailey Laidlaw, 2020. "No longer in the driver’s seat: How do affective motivations impact consumer interest in automated vehicles?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2601-2634, October.
    13. Benoît Lécureux & Adrien Bonnet & Ouassim Manout & Jaâfar Berrada & Louafi Bouzouina, 2022. "Acceptance of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Literature Review of stated choice experiments," Working Papers hal-03814947, HAL.
    14. Kolarova, Viktoriya & Steck, Felix & Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J., 2019. "Assessing the effect of autonomous driving on value of travel time savings: A comparison between current and future preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 155-169.
    15. Jairo Ortega & János Tóth & Tamás Péter & Sarbast Moslem, 2020. "An Integrated Model of Park-And-Ride Facilities for Sustainable Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Zgheib, Najib & Abou-Zeid, Maya & Kaysi, Isam, 2020. "Modeling demand for ridesourcing as feeder for high capacity mass transit systems with an application to the planned Beirut BRT," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 70-91.
    17. Devon McAslan & Farah Najar Arevalo & David A. King & Thaddeus R. Miller, 2021. "Pilot project purgatory? Assessing automated vehicle pilot projects in U.S. cities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Zhang, Yufeng & Khani, Alireza, 2021. "Integrating transit systems with ride-sourcing services: A study on the system users’ stochastic equilibrium problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 95-123.
    19. Asmussen, Katherine E. & Mondal, Aupal & Bhat, Chandra R., 2022. "Adoption of partially automated vehicle technology features and impacts on vehicle miles of travel (VMT)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 156-179.
    20. Manon Feys & Evy Rombaut & Lieselot Vanhaverbeke, 2020. "Experience and Acceptance of Autonomous Shuttles in the Brussels Capital Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13023-:d:1228198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.