IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12520-d1219527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Utilization of Jackfruit ( Artocarpus heterophyllus L.) Waste towards Sustainable Energy and Biochemicals: The Attainment of Zero-Waste Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Prakash Kumar Sarangi

    (College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal 795004, India
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Rajesh Kumar Srivastava

    (Department of Biotechnology, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management (GITAM), Visakhapatnam 530045, India
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Akhilesh Kumar Singh

    (Department of Biotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi Central University, Motihari 845401, India)

  • Uttam Kumar Sahoo

    (Department of Forestry, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, India)

  • Piotr Prus

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Paweł Dziekański

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-369 Kielce, Poland)

Abstract

The valorisation of food and fruit wastes has the potential for the production of sustainable energy and biochemicals. Approximately 70% of the weight of the original jackfruit ( Artocarpus heterophyllus L.) fruit is lost during its processing as waste in the form of peeled skin and core, both of which have not been utilized and, thus these contribute to disposal as well as pollution issues. The major components such as cellulose and hemicellulose can be easily biologically transformed into bioenergy sources such as ethanol, methanol, and butanol; valuable phenolics and biotechnological products such as pectin, citric acid, bromelain, ferulic acid, and vanillin; and many other products. These residues can also be utilized as essential sources for the biological transformation process, leading to the production of numerous products with added value, such as phenolic antioxidants, phenolic flavour compounds, and organic acids. Thus, the value addition of jackfruit waste can support sustainable solutions towards food and nutritional security. In this way, zero waste can be achieved through novel biorefineries, which are critically highlighted in this paper. Furthermore, novel technologies for the conversion of jackfruit waste are summarized with recent findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Rajesh Kumar Srivastava & Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Piotr Prus & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "The Utilization of Jackfruit ( Artocarpus heterophyllus L.) Waste towards Sustainable Energy and Biochemicals: The Attainment of Zero-Waste Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-30, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12520-:d:1219527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12520/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12520/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Cunsheng & Kang, Xinxin & Wang, Fenghuan & Tian, Yufei & Liu, Tao & Su, Yanyan & Qian, Tingting & Zhang, Yifeng, 2020. "Valorization of food waste for cost-effective reducing sugar recovery in a two-stage enzymatic hydrolysis platform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Alves, José Luiz Francisco & da Silva, Jean Constantino Gomes & Mumbach, Guilherme Davi & Domenico, Michele Di & da Silva Filho, Valdemar Francisco & de Sena, Rennio Felix & Machado, Ricardo Antonio F, 2020. "Insights into the bioenergy potential of jackfruit wastes considering their physicochemical properties, bioenergy indicators, combustion behaviors, and emission characteristics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1328-1338.
    3. Lorena De Medina-Salas & Mario Rafael Giraldi-Díaz & Eduardo Castillo-González & Laura Elena Morales-Mendoza, 2020. "Valorization of Orange Peel Waste Using Precomposting and Vermicomposting Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    4. D’Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Huisingh, Donald & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2021. "A circular economy model based on biomethane: What are the opportunities for the municipality of Rome and beyond?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1660-1672.
    5. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Priti Pal & Saurabh Singh Rathore & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Piotr Prus & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Sustainable Utilization of Biowaste Resources for Biogas Production to Meet Rural Bioenergy Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karin Meisterl & Sergio Sastre & Ignasi Puig-Ventosa & Rosaria Chifari & Laura Martínez Sánchez & Laurène Chochois & Gabriella Fiorentino & Amalia Zucaro, 2024. "Circular Bioeconomy in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona: Policy Recommendations to Optimize Biowaste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Gaurav Kumar Porichha & Yulin Hu & Kasanneni Tirumala Venkateswara Rao & Chunbao Charles Xu, 2021. "Crop Residue Management in India: Stubble Burning vs. Other Utilizations including Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Diego Teixeira Michalovicz & Patricia Bilotta, 2023. "Impact of a methane emission tax on circular economy scenarios in small wastewater treatment plants," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6575-6589, July.
    4. Muhammad Ikram, 2021. "Models for Predicting Non-Renewable Energy Competing with Renewable Source for Sustainable Energy Development: Case of Asia and Oceania Region," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 133-160, December.
    5. Mattia Boscherini & Alba Storione & Matteo Minelli & Francesco Miccio & Ferruccio Doghieri, 2023. "New Perspectives on Catalytic Hydrogen Production by the Reforming, Partial Oxidation and Decomposition of Methane and Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-33, September.
    6. Marzena Smol & Paulina Marcinek & Joanna Duda, 2024. "Circular Business Models (CBMs) in Environmental Management—Analysis of Definitions, Typologies and Methods of Creation in Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Uchechukwu Stella Ezealigo & Blessing Nonye Ezealigo & Francis Kemausuor & Luke Ekem Kweku Achenie & Azikiwe Peter Onwualu, 2021. "Biomass Valorization to Bioenergy: Assessment of Biomass Residues’ Availability and Bioenergy Potential in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Joanna Szulc & Błażej Błaszak & Anna Wenda-Piesik & Grażyna Gozdecka & Ewa Żary-Sikorska & Małgorzata Bąk & Justyna Bauza-Kaszewska, 2023. "Zero Waste Technology of Soybeans Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Judit Lovasné Avató & Viktoria Mannheim, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment Model of a Catering Product: Comparing Environmental Impacts for Different End-of-Life Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Seok-Jun Kim & Kwang-Cheol Oh & Sun-Yong Park & Young-Min Ju & La-Hoon Cho & Chung-Geon Lee & Min-Jun Kim & In-Seon Jeong & Dae-Hyun Kim, 2021. "Development and Validation of Mass Reduction Prediction Model and Analysis of Fuel Properties for Agro-Byproduct Torrefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    11. Piotr Kosowski & Katarzyna Kosowska & Wojciech Nawalaniec, 2022. "Application of Bayesian Networks in Modeling of Underground Gas Storage Energy Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Idiano D’Adamo & Piergiuseppe Morone & Donald Huisingh, 2021. "Bioenergy: A Sustainable Shift," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-5, September.
    13. Viktoria Mannheim & Judit Lovasné Avató, 2023. "Life-Cycle Assessments of Meat-Free and Meat-Containing Diets by Integrating Sustainability and Lean: Meat-Free Dishes Are Sustainable," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    14. A. Silveira, Edgar & Santanna Chaves, Bruno & Macedo, Lucélia & Ghesti, Grace F. & Evaristo, Rafael B.W. & Cruz Lamas, Giulia & Luz, Sandra M. & Protásio, Thiago de Paula & Rousset, Patrick, 2023. "A hybrid optimization approach towards energy recovery from torrefied waste blends," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 151-165.
    15. G. Venkatesh, 2022. "Circular Bio-economy—Paradigm for the Future: Systematic Review of Scientific Journal Publications from 2015 to 2021," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    16. Mairon G. Bastos Lima, 2021. "Corporate Power in the Bioeconomy Transition: The Policies and Politics of Conservative Ecological Modernization in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Sica, Daniela & Esposito, Benedetta & Supino, Stefania & Malandrino, Ornella & Sessa, Maria Rosaria, 2023. "Biogas-based systems: An opportunity towards a post-fossil and circular economy perspective in Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Muhamed Rasit Atelge & Halil Senol & Mohammed Djaafri & Tulin Avci Hansu & David Krisa & Abdulaziz Atabani & Cigdem Eskicioglu & Hamdi Muratçobanoğlu & Sebahattin Unalan & Slimane Kalloum & Nuri Azbar, 2021. "A Critical Overview of the State-of-the-Art Methods for Biogas Purification and Utilization Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-39, October.
    19. Akinola David Olugbemide & Ana Oberlintner & Uroš Novak & Blaž Likozar, 2021. "Lignocellulosic Corn Stover Biomass Pre-Treatment by Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES) for Biomethane Production Process by Bioresource Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
    20. Idiano D’Adamo & Claudio Sassanelli, 2022. "Biomethane Community: A Research Agenda towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12520-:d:1219527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.