IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i19p5062-d1756446.html

The Influence of Vine Rootstock Type on the Energy Potential of Differentiated Material Obtained from Wine Production

Author

Listed:
  • Kamila E. Klimek

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

  • Magdalena Kapłan

    (Institute of Horticulture Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Maj

    (Department of Power Engineering and Transportation, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

  • Anna Borkowska

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

  • Kamil Buczyński

    (Institute of Horticulture Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

In the context of growing demand for renewable energy sources and greenhouse gas emission reductions, increasing attention is being paid to the use of agricultural waste as bioenergy feedstock. The energy potential of biomass in the form of vine stems and pomace from the Regent variety of grapes, grafted onto their own roots and various types of rootstocks (125AA, SO 4 , 161-49), was assessed, where the control group consisted of ungrafted shrubs growing on their own roots, cultivated in south-eastern Poland. The analyses included the determination of technical and elementary parameters, pollutant emission indicators, and exhaust gas composition parameters. Compared to stems, pomace had a higher calorific value, higher C and H content, and lower dust emissions, while at the same time emitting more CO 2 . Stems, on the other hand, showed higher ash content and higher dust emissions, which may limit their energy potential. Among the analysed substrates, pomace from 125AA achieved the highest calorific values at a low moisture content, while biomass from substrate 161-49 was distinguished by the lowest sulphur content and a favourable emission balance. Cluster analysis showed clear grouping of substrates in terms of fuel and emission parameters, indicating the possibility of optimal substrate selection for the production of bioenergy feedstock. The results confirm that the appropriate selection of rootstocks in viticulture can significantly increase the energy value of waste biomass and reduce emissions, supporting the development of local renewable energy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamila E. Klimek & Magdalena Kapłan & Grzegorz Maj & Anna Borkowska & Kamil Buczyński, 2025. "The Influence of Vine Rootstock Type on the Energy Potential of Differentiated Material Obtained from Wine Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5062-:d:1756446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5062/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/19/5062/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaashikaa, P.R. & Kumar, P. Senthil, 2022. "Valorization of agro-industrial wastes for biorefinery process and circular bioeconomy: A critical review," MPRA Paper 112234, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Tomasz Kalak, 2023. "Potential Use of Industrial Biomass Waste as a Sustainable Energy Source in the Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Teresa Enes & José Aranha & Teresa Fonseca & Domingos Lopes & Ana Alves & José Lousada, 2019. "Thermal Properties of Residual Agroforestry Biomass of Northern Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Parrado-Hernando, Gonzalo & Pfeifer, Antun & Frechoso, Fernando & Miguel González, Luis Javier & Duić, Neven, 2022. "A novel approach to represent the energy system in integrated assessment models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. van Dijk, Mathilde & Goedegebure, Robert & Nap, Jan-Peter, 2024. "Public acceptance of biomass for bioenergy: The need for feedstock differentiation and communicating a waste utilization frame," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    6. Salcedo-Puerto, Orlando & Mendoza-Martinez, Clara & Vakkilainen, Esa, 2025. "Solid residues from cocoa production chain: Assessment of thermochemical valorization routes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    7. Alves, José Luiz Francisco & da Silva, Jean Constantino Gomes & Mumbach, Guilherme Davi & Domenico, Michele Di & da Silva Filho, Valdemar Francisco & de Sena, Rennio Felix & Machado, Ricardo Antonio F, 2020. "Insights into the bioenergy potential of jackfruit wastes considering their physicochemical properties, bioenergy indicators, combustion behaviors, and emission characteristics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1328-1338.
    8. Yarima Torreiro & Leticia Pérez & Gonzalo Piñeiro & Francisco Pedras & Angela Rodríguez-Abalde, 2020. "The Role of Energy Valuation of Agroforestry Biomass on the Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Kapłan & Kamila E. Klimek & Grzegorz Maj & Kamil Buczyński & Anna Borkowska, 2025. "Assessment of the Energy Parameters of Pedicels and Pomace of Selected Grapevine Varieties from the PIWI Group," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Kamila E. Klimek & Saban Kordali & Anna Borkowska & Ferah Yilmaz & Grzegorz Maj, 2025. "Energy Assessment of Hazelnut Shells ( Corylus avellana L.) of Selected Turkish Varieties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Santhappan, Joseph Sekhar & Narasimman, Kalaiselvan & Winsly, Beno Wincy & Varghese, Alfred Franklin & Mathimani, Thangavel, 2025. "A critical evaluation of the progression in industrial waste utilization to achieve energy transition targets: technological obstacles, carbon footprint reduction, and life cycle assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    4. Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2020. "Torrefied Biomass as an Alternative in Coal-Fueled Power Plants: A Case Study on Grindability of Agroforestry Waste Forms," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Liliana M. E. F. Loureiro & Letícia C. R. Sá & Hugo F. C. Silva, 2020. "Waste Recovery through Thermochemical Conversion Technologies: A Case Study with Several Portuguese Agroforestry By-Products," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Bernardine Chigozie Chidozie & Ana Luísa Ramos & José Vasconcelos Ferreira & Luís Pinto Ferreira, 2023. "Residual Agroforestry Biomass Supply Chain Simulation Insights and Directions: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Grzegorz Maj & Anna Borkowska & Kamila E. Klimek & Saban Kordali & Ferah Yilmaz, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Energy and Emission Properties of Hazelnut Shell Biomass from Temperate and Subtropical Climates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-12, September.
    8. Jepleting, Anceita & Mecha, Achisa C. & Sombei, Dorcas & Moraa, Doricah & Chollom, Martha N., 2025. "Potential of low-cost materials for biogas purification, a review of recent developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Natalia Matłok & Grzegorz Zaguła & Józef Gorzelany & Maciej Balawejder, 2024. "Analysis of the Energy Potential of Waste Biomass Generated from Fruit Tree Seedling Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Bernardine Chidozie & Ana Ramos & José Vasconcelos & Luis Pinto Ferreira & Reinaldo Gomes, 2024. "Highlighting Sustainability Criteria in Residual Biomass Supply Chains: A Dynamic Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    11. Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Priti Pal & Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Piotr Prus, 2024. "Food Waste to Food Security: Transition from Bioresources to Sustainability," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, November.
    12. Cristian Barra & Vincenzo D’Atteo & Edgardo Sica, 2025. "Enhancing efficiency in secondary biomass supply: the role of institutional quality in the EU regions," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 1-43, October.
    13. Grzegorz Maj & Kamila E. Klimek & Magdalena Kapłan & Kamil Buczyński & Anna Borkowska, 2024. "Combustion and Energy Parameters of Grape Pomace/Skin Waste in Wine Production—Regent Variety Grafted onto Rootstocks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Grzegorz Maj & Kamil Buczyński & Kamila E. Klimek & Magdalena Kapłan, 2024. "Evaluation of Growth and Energy Parameters of One-Year-Old Raspberry Shoots, Depending on the Variety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-12, June.
    15. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Abel M. Rodrigues & João C. O. Matias & Ana I. Ferraz & Ana C. Rodrigues, 2021. "Production of Biochar from Vine Pruning: Waste Recovery in the Wine Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Ekaterina S. Titova, 2019. "Biofuel Application as a Factor of Sustainable Development Ensuring: The Case of Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    17. Giorgia Di Domenico & Elisa Cioccolo & Leonardo Bianchini & Rachele Venanzi & Andrea Colantoni & Rodolfo Picchio & Luca Cozzolino & Valerio Di Stefano, 2025. "A Systematic Review of Mechanical Pretreatment Techniques of Wood Biomass for Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Dejun Zhou & Emma Serwaa Obobisa & Emmanuel Caesar Ayamba, 2026. "Achieving carbon neutrality goal in European countries: the role of green technology innovation, renewable energy, and financial development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1671-1701, January.
    19. Rivero-Iglesias, Jose M. & Puente, Javier & Fernandez, Isabel & León, Omar, 2023. "Integrated model for the assessment of power generation alternatives through analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy inference system. Case study of Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 563-581.
    20. Mirosław Wyszkowski & Natalia Kordala, 2024. "Trace Elements in Maize Biomass Used to Phyto-Stabilise Iron-Contaminated Soils for Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:19:p:5062-:d:1756446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.