IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p12069-d1211978.html

Determinants of Motivation to Work in Terms of Industry 4.0—The Gen Z Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Bińczycki

    (College of Management and Quality Sciences, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Kraków, Poland)

  • Wiesław Łukasiński

    (College of Management and Quality Sciences, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Kraków, Poland)

  • Sławomir Dorocki

    (Institute of Law and Economics, Pedagogical University of Cracow, 30-084 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

The mentality of Generation Z differs markedly from the approach to social and economic issues presented by earlier generations. These young people have had access to the internet and other innovative technologies since birth. A tape recorder or a floppy disk is a museum exhibit for them. They are unfamiliar with the everyday problems that citizens of Central and Eastern Europe faced during the socialist era, such as the lack of necessities on the shelves. The aim of this article is to present the results of the authors’ survey on the identification of work motivation factors relevant to Generation Z. The survey involved 649 respondents, young Poles who are currently entering the labor market. It was also an interesting research task for the authors to compare the results of surveys among young Poles with the results of international surveys. The research provided insight into young people’s expectations, values, and preferences regarding work. The results of the survey can provide valuable guidance for employers in shaping sustainable human resource management strategies. In addition, studying the competences of Generation Z can identify the gap between the requirements of the labor market and the skills possessed by young workers. The study conducted by the authors is among the first of its kind in Poland after the pandemic, emphasizing the growing trend in remote work. Earlier research was undertaken in a different economic climate. The current investigation took place following the COVID-19 outbreak and amidst heightened military operations in Ukraine. It also takes into account the effects of recent technological progress related to the rapid development of Industry 4.0. Notably, the questionnaire used in this study is unique as the authors categorized motivational factors into three essential groups, highly relevant in today’s markedly altered labor market.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Bińczycki & Wiesław Łukasiński & Sławomir Dorocki, 2023. "Determinants of Motivation to Work in Terms of Industry 4.0—The Gen Z Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12069-:d:1211978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12069/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12069/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milan Kovačević & Srđan Blagojević & Bojan Kuzmanović, 2020. "Sustainability of the Motivation Policy Model for Employees in State Administration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Elstner, Steffen & Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2016. "Bedingt abwehrbereit: Deutschland im digitalen Wandel," Working Papers 03/2016, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung.
    3. Konul Aghayeva & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2019. "Analytic Hierarchy of Motivating and Demotivating Factors Affecting Labor Productivity in the Construction Industry: The Case of Azerbaijan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Malin Lohela-Karlsson & Irene Jensen & Christina Björklund, 2022. "Do Attitudes towards Work or Work Motivation Affect Productivity Loss among Academic Employees?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Kocot & Artur Kwasek & Anna Pigula & Sylwia Marek & Leonard Milewski & Arkadiusz Weremczuk & Malgorzata Golinska-Pieszynska, 2026. "Comprehensiveness of Services as an Organizational Model in a Micro-Medical Enterprise: A Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 217-228.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phi-Hung Nguyen, 2023. "A Fully Completed Spherical Fuzzy Data-Driven Model for Analyzing Employee Satisfaction in Logistics Service Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, May.
    2. Bofinger, Peter & Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Wieland, Volker, 2018. "Vor wichtigen wirtschaftspolitischen Weichenstellungen. Jahresgutachten 2018/19 [Setting the Right Course for Economic Policy. Annual Report 2018/19]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201819.
    3. Matthias Pfaff & Rainer Walz, 2021. "Analysis of the development and structural drivers of raw‐material use in Germany," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 1063-1075, August.
    4. repec:hal:journl:hal-04222195 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Roth, Ines, 2018. "Digitalisierung in der Energiewirtschaft: Technologische Trends und ihre Auswirkungen auf Arbeit und Qualifizierung," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 073, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    6. Bogai, Dieter & Wiethölter, Doris & Buch, Tanja & Dengler, Katharina, 2017. "Digitalisierung der Arbeit : Abschätzung der Automatisierungspotenziale von Berufen in Berlin und Brandenburg," IAB-Regional. Berichte und Analysen aus dem Regionalen Forschungsnetz. IAB Berlin-Brandenburg 201702, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    7. Hösl, Maximilian & Kniep,Ronja, 2020. "Auf den Spuren eines Politikfeldes: Die Institutionalisierung von Internetpolitik in der Ministerialverwaltung," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 29(3-4), pages 207-235.
    8. Agnieszka Barczak & Izabela Dembińska & Tomasz Rostkowski & Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska & Dorota Rozmus, 2021. "Structure of Remuneration as Assessed by Employees of the Energy Sector—Multivariate Correspondence Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Milos Hitka & Silvia Lorincova & Milos Gejdos & Martina Lipoldova, 2022. "Employee motivation during the time of the crisis in agricultural and forestry organizations: Case study," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(7), pages 271-281.
    10. Mila Kavalić & Milan Nikolić & Dragica Radosav & Sanja Stanisavljev & Mladen Pečujlija, 2021. "Influencing Factors on Knowledge Management for Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Bazi, Saleh & Filieri, Raffaele & Gorton, Matthew, 2020. "Customers’ motivation to engage with luxury brands on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 223-235.
    12. Slobodan Ćulafić & Tatjana Janovac & Saša Virijević Jovanović & Jelena Tadić & Jamila Jaganjac & Aleksandra Milošević & Aleksandra Bibić, 2021. "State Incentives and Sustainable Motivation System in the Health Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Susannah Bruns Ali & Mohamad Alkadry & Evelyn Rodriguez-Plesa & Ana Maria Dimand, 2025. "Perceptions vs. Realities of Pay: Exploring their Influence on the Choice to Leave," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 2159-2179, December.
    14. Nobuki Hashiguchi & Shintaro Sengoku & Yasushi Kubota & Shigeo Kitahara & Yeongjoo Lim & Kota Kodama, 2020. "Age-Dependent Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations on Construction Worker Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Fuad Ganbarov & Klaudia Smoląg & Rashad Muradov & Konul Aghayeva & Rumella Jafarova & Yashar Mammadov, 2020. "Sustainable Development of the Mortgage Market in Azerbaijan: Commercial Risks of Housing Construction, Social Vision, and State Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Holger Zemanek & Jörg Krämer & Marco Wagner & Thieß Petersen & Tom Krebs & Martin Scheffel & Thomas Mayer & Steffen Elstner & Christoph M. Schmidt, 2016. "Geringes Wirtschaftswachstum und Abwärtstrend bei Investitionen: Wege aus der Wachstumsschwäche," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(22), pages 03-21, November.
    17. Sílvia Lopes & Ana Sabino & Paulo C. Dias & Anabela Rodrigues & Maria José Chambel & Francisco Cesário, 2022. "Through the Lens of Workers’ Motivation: Does It Relate to Work–Family Relationship Perceptions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12069-:d:1211978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.