IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p9910-d1176239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Training Leaders to Facilitate an Energy Transition: Retrospective Evaluation of Course Design

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Newman

    (Erb Institute, School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Sarah Mills

    (Graham Sustainability Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Sara Soderstrom

    (Organizational Studies and Program in the Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

Abstract

While there is a widely shared sense that policy action is required for the electricity system in the United States to decarbonize, most climate policy courses focus only on a handful of federal and state policies. In reality, however, there is a web of state- and local-government-level policy choices that can serve to facilitate or hinder an energy transition, which is less discussed and researched in higher education. A new graduate course, first taught in Winter 2019 at the University of Michigan in the Ford School of Public Policy, employs a range of unique course design elements to introduce the idea of a complex web of policies and actors in the energy transition, and to provide students with practical skills to prepare them to be leaders in the transition. By interviewing students 18 months after finishing the Winter 2019 iteration of the course, in addition to surveying students enrolled in the second interaction of the course in the Fall 2020 semester, this study finds that student experiential learning and applied projects, in tandem with the instructor’s focus on local, real-world implications, was found to be effective in preparing students to be climate leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Newman & Sarah Mills & Sara Soderstrom, 2023. "Training Leaders to Facilitate an Energy Transition: Retrospective Evaluation of Course Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9910-:d:1176239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9910/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9910/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanya Carley & Lincoln L. Davies & David B. Spence & Nikolaos Zirogiannis, 2019. "Author Correction: Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(2), pages 167-168, February.
    2. Michael Shriberg & Kathryn Harris, 2012. "Building sustainability change management and leadership skills in students: lessons learned from “Sustainability and the Campus” at the University of Michigan," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 154-164, June.
    3. Zhang, Kun & Wang, Qian & Liang, Qiao-Mei & Chen, Hao, 2016. "A bibliometric analysis of research on carbon tax from 1989 to 2014," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 297-310.
    4. Lienhoop, Nele, 2018. "Acceptance of wind energy and the role of financial and procedural participation: An investigation with focus groups and choice experiments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 97-105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solaymani, Saeed, 2019. "CO2 emissions patterns in 7 top carbon emitter economies: The case of transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 989-1001.
    2. Chunyi Ji & Xinyue Wang & Wei Zhao & Xuan Wang & Wuyong Qian, 2025. "The Impact of Environmental Policies on Renewable Energy Storage Decisions in the Power Supply Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Parrish Bergquist & Christopher Warshaw, 2023. "How climate policy commitments influence energy systems and the economies of US states," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Radtke, Jörg, 2025. "E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Chances and challenges within Germany's Energiewende," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    5. Hu, Xing & Yu, Shiwei & Fang, Xu & Ovaere, Marten, 2023. "Which combinations of renewable energy policies work better? Insights from policy text synergies in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    6. Wang, Linyuan & Zhao, Lin & Mao, Guozhu & Zuo, Jian & Du, Huibin, 2017. "Way to accomplish low carbon development transformation: A bibliometric analysis during 1995–2014," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 57-69.
    7. Neal D. Woods, 2021. "The State of State Environmental Policy Research: A Thirty‐Year Progress Report," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(3), pages 347-369, May.
    8. David Conner & Amanda Falkner & Nathan Lantieri & Betsy McGavisk & Bridgette McShea, 2018. "Stakeholder Perceptions of Campus Sustainability Efforts: Lessons from Vermont," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Francisco Haces-Fernandez, 2022. "Assessment of the Financial Benefits from Wind Farms in US Rural Locations," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Kim, Jung Eun & Tang, Tian, 2020. "Preventing early lock-in with technology-specific policy designs: The Renewable Portfolio Standards and diversity in renewable energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    11. Sirr, Gordon & Power, Bernadette & Ryan, Geraldine & Eakins, John & O’Connor, Ellen & le Maitre, Julia, 2023. "An analysis of the factors affecting Irish citizens’ willingness to invest in wind energy projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Wei, Shuni & Yuan, Peng & Yu, Renjie, 2025. "Can renewable portfolio standard promote renewable energy capacity utilization? Empirical evidence from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    13. Kim, Kyung Jae & Lee, Hwarang & Koo, Yoonmo, 2020. "Research on local acceptance cost of renewable energy in South Korea: A case study of photovoltaic and wind power projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Liu, Dunnan & Liu, Mingguang & Xu, Erfeng & Pang, Bo & Guo, Xiaodan & Xiao, Bowen & Niu, Dongxiao, 2018. "Comprehensive effectiveness assessment of renewable energy generation policy: A partial equilibrium analysis in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 330-341.
    15. Hongyang Li & Shuying Fang & Long Chen & Vanessa Menadue & Skitmore Martin, 2024. "Extended reality (XR)—A magic box of digitalization in driving sustainable development of the construction industry: A critical review," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2830-2845, June.
    16. Vuichard, Pascal & Stauch, Alexander & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2021. "Keep it local and low-key: Social acceptance of alpine solar power projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Rountree, Valerie, 2019. "Nevada's experience with the Renewable Portfolio Standard," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 279-291.
    18. Côté, Elizabeth & Đukan, Mak & Pons-Seres de Brauwer, Cristian & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2022. "The price of actor diversity: Measuring project developers’ willingness to accept risks in renewable energy auctions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Thirupathi Rao & Siti Indati Mustapa, 2020. "A Review of Climate Economic Models in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Nicole Motzer & Aleta Rudeen Weller & K Curran & Simon Donner & Ronald J. Heustis & Cathy Jordan & Margaret Krebs & Lydia Olandar & Kirsten Rowell & Linda Silka & Diana H. Wall & Abigail York, 2021. "Integrating Programmatic Expertise from across the US and Canada to Model and Guide Leadership Training for Graduate Students in Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9910-:d:1176239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.