IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10337-d1183495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

World Heritage Site Tourism and Destination Loyalty along the Silk Road: A Study of U.S. Travelers in Uzbekistan

Author

Listed:
  • Husanjon Juraturgunov

    (Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)

  • Murodjon Raimkulov

    (Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)

  • Young-joo Ahn

    (Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
    Tourism Industry Data Analytics Lab (TIDAL), Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)

  • Eunice Minjoo Kang

    (Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study aims to examine the determinants of destination loyalty toward World Heritage Sites (WHSs) along Silk Road tourism in Uzbekistan. It could enable the profiling of inbound tourists visiting WHSs and identification of the important determinants of destination loyalty. The results of this study could present valuable empirical evidence of Silk Road tourism among inbound travelers in Uzbekistan. An online survey was conducted to collect data from U.S. residents who experienced Silk Road tourism in Uzbekistan. A total of 419 questionnaires were used for this study. The present study explored the determinants of destination loyalty among inbound travelers who had visited WHSs along Silk Road destinations in Uzbekistan. Regarding the effect of length of stay on destination loyalty, travelers who visit for 7–13 days are inclined to show higher destination loyalty than the other groups. Free independent travelers to cultural and heritage sites showed a higher level of destination loyalty than other traveler types. The results indicated that travelers who reported visiting the Historic Centre of Bukhara in the Province of Bukhara and Western Tien-Shan in the Province of Tashkent showed higher destination loyalty. The proposed model consists of travel characteristics, WHS destinations, and demographic characteristics. This study provides several important theoretical and managerial implications. Moreover, this study can contribute to knowledge regarding WHSs and increase sustainable destination management to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs).

Suggested Citation

  • Husanjon Juraturgunov & Murodjon Raimkulov & Young-joo Ahn & Eunice Minjoo Kang, 2023. "World Heritage Site Tourism and Destination Loyalty along the Silk Road: A Study of U.S. Travelers in Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10337-:d:1183495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10337/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chih-Hai Yang & Hsun-Yu Lin, 2014. "Revisiting the Relationship between World Heritage Sites and Tourism," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(1), pages 73-86, February.
    2. Lasse Steiner & Bruno S. Frey, 2011. "Imbalance of World Heritage List: did the UNESCO strategy work?," ECON - Working Papers 014, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    3. Nurul Diyana Md Khairi & Hairul Nizam Ismail & Syed Muhammad Rafy Syed Jaafar, 2019. "Tourist behaviour through consumption in Melaka World Heritage Site," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 582-600, March.
    4. Murodjon Raimkulov & Husanjon Juraturgunov & Young-joo Ahn, 2021. "Destination Attractiveness and Memorable Travel Experiences in Silk Road Tourism in Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Di Tian & Qiongyao Wang & Rob Law & Mu Zhang, 2020. "Influence of Cultural Identity on Tourists’ Authenticity Perception, Tourist Satisfaction, and Traveler Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Bahodirhon Safarov & Hisham Mohammad Al-Smadi & Makhina Buzrukova & Bekzot Janzakov & Alexandru Ilieş & Vasile Grama & Dorina Camelia Ilieș & Katalin Csobán Vargáné & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2022. "Forecasting the Volume of Tourism Services in Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    7. IpKin Anthony Wong & Weibing Max Zhao, 2016. "Exploring the effect of geographic convenience on repeat visitation and tourist spending: the moderating role of novelty seeking," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 824-844, July.
    8. Yen E. Lam-González & Richard Clouet & Niurka Cruz Sosa & Javier de León, 2021. "Dissatisfaction Responses of Tourists in the Havana World Heritage Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Aigul Sergeyeva & Akzhunus Abdullina & Mamatkodir Nazarov & Izimbet Turdimambetov & Muxammadismoil Maxmudov & Sergey Yanchuk, 2022. "Development of Cross-Border Tourism in Accordance with the Principles of Sustainable Development on the Kazakhstan-Uzbekistan Border," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Sifeng Nian & Donghe Li & Jie Zhang & Song Lu & Xiaowan Zhang, 2023. "Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework: Is the Perceived Outstanding Universal Value Attractiveness of Tourists Beneficial to World Heritage Site Conservation?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Qian Jin & Hui Hu & Xiaozhi Su & Alastair M. Morrison, 2021. "The Influence of the Characteristics of Online Itinerary on Purchasing Behavior," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Parga Dans, Eva & Alonso González, Pablo, 2019. "Sustainable tourism and social value at World Heritage Sites: Towards a conservation plan for Altamira, Spain," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 68-80.
    13. Bruno Frey & Paolo Pamini & Lasse Steiner, 2013. "Explaining the World Heritage List: an empirical study," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 60(1), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Xiaoyan Su & Gary Gordon Sigley & Changqing Song, 2020. "Relational Authenticity and Reconstructed Heritage Space: A Balance of Heritage Preservation, Tourism, and Urban Renewal in Luoyang Silk Road Dingding Gate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Ji Young Jeong & Mamurbek Karimov & Yuldoshboy Sobirov & Olimjon Saidmamatov & Peter Marty, 2023. "Evaluating Culturalization Strategies for Sustainable Tourism Development in Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1, May.
    16. Kamoliddin Fayzullaev & Susanna Heldt Cassel & Daniel Brandt, 2021. "Destination image in Uzbekistan – heritage of the Silk Road and nature experience as the core of an evolving Post Soviet identity," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7-8), pages 446-461, June.
    17. Stella Kostopoulou & Paraskevi-Kali Sofianou & Konstantinos Tsiokanos, 2021. "Silk Road Heritage Branding and Polycentric Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Young-joo Ahn, 2021. "City Branding and Sustainable Destination Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-4, December.
    2. Janina Heim & Max Krott & Michael Böcher, 2018. "Nomination and inscription of the “Ancient Beech Forests of Germany” as natural World Heritage: multi-level governance between science and politics," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 599-617, August.
    3. Mohamed Abdalla Elsayed Hassan & Konstantina Zerva & Silvia Aulet, 2021. "Brand Personality Traits of World Heritage Sites: Text Mining Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Daniela Sorea & Codrina Csesznek & Gabriela Georgeta Rățulea, 2022. "The Culture-Centered Development Potential of Communities in Făgăraș Land (Romania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, June.
    5. Palazzo, Maria & Vollero, Agostino & Vitale, Pierluigi & Siano, Alfonso, 2021. "Urban and rural destinations on Instagram: Exploring the influencers’ role in #sustainabletourism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Martín León-Santiesteban & Martha Cecilia Mendez-Prada & Yolanda Patricia Cardona-Arce & Nelly Guerrero-Mosquera, 2023. "Multicriteria Model for Measuring the Potential of Cultural Identity in the Tourism Development of Sincelejo, Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Dawei Li & Shangyi Zhou, 2021. "Evaluating the Authenticity of Naxi Music in Three Stages from the Perspective of Naxi Musicians: An Application of Lacan’s Mirror Stage Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Bayezid Ismail Choudhury, 2021. "Jatio Sangsad Bhaban: Aspiring to be a UNESCO World Heritage Site," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 11(4), pages 1-6.
    9. Fernández Guzmán Antonio Muñoz & Pérez-Gálvez Jesús Claudio & López-Guzmán Tomás, 2016. "Tourist motivations in a heritage destination in Spain," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 226-235, December.
    10. Kaixuan Huang & Yi Liu, 2023. "The embeddedness and hidden political economy of the world heritage site inscription boom in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 572-595, June.
    11. Martina Dattilo & Fabio Padovano & Yvon Rocaboy, 2020. "Is beauty defined by victors? An analysis of colonial sites of the UNESCO WHL," Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS 2020-04-ccr, Condorcet Center for political Economy.
    12. Scott Barrett, 2022. "A Biodiversity Hotspots Treaty: The Road not Taken," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(4), pages 937-954, December.
    13. He, Jun & Huang, Zilong & Mishra, Arunodaya Raj & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "Developing a new framework for conceptualizing the emerging sustainable community-based tourism using an extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-MULTIMOORA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    14. Alper Bozkurt & Ferhat Şeker, 2023. "Harmonizing Heritage and Artificial Neural Networks: The Role of Sustainable Tourism in UNESCO World Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Eva Parga Dans & Pablo Alonso González, 2021. "The Unethical Enterprise of the Past: Lessons from the Collapse of Archaeological Heritage Management in Spain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 447-461, September.
    16. Eleonora Santos, 2023. "From Neglect to Progress: Assessing Social Sustainability and Decent Work in the Tourism Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    17. Enrico Bertacchini & Federico Revelli, 2021. "Kalòs kai agathòs? government quality and cultural heritage in the regions of Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(2), pages 513-539, October.
    18. Martina Dattilo & Fabio Padovano & Yvon Rocaboy, 2023. "More is worse: the evolution of quality of the UNESCO World Heritage List and its determinants," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 47(1), pages 71-96, March.
    19. Young-joo Ahn & Jeanne Bessiere, 2022. "The Role of Participative Leadership in Empowerment and Resident Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Yongjun Su & Junjie Xu & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2021. "Authenticity, Perceived Value and Loyalty in Marine Tourism Destinations: The Case of Zhoushan, Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10337-:d:1183495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.