IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9222-d1165833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Strategy to Solve “the Tragedy of the Commons” in Sustainable Grassland Ecological Compensation: Experience from Inner Mongolia, China

Author

Listed:
  • Qinghu Liao

    (School of Public Management, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

  • Wenwen Dong

    (School of Public Management, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

  • Boxin Zhao

    (School of Public Management, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

Abstract

Based on the principle of “who protects and benefits will compensate”, in recent years, many Chinese herders have begun to voluntarily participate in sustainable grassland ecological compensation by donating money. However, this traditional strategy may have brought about “the tragedy of the commons”. A new strategy described as “wealthy herders pay money, ordinary herders participate in supervision, and relevant departments post a list of participants at the end of each month”, which was trialed in the Keshiketeng Banner, Inner Mongolia, China, attempts to solve “the tragedy of the commons”. This new strategy is neither “Leviathan” nor “Privatization”; it creates a third way for grassland herders to achieve spontaneous cooperation in protecting grassland ecology. This article presents a theoretical analysis framework and experimental simulation method using this new strategy. Considering the importance of face culture and gossip in herders’ social lives, this study used a public goods game (PGG) model to analyze and experimentally simulate the effect of this new strategy. The simulated data show the following: (1) Compared with the traditional strategy, this new strategy promotes cooperation more effectively. It requires less money, time and human capital from herders and can mobilize more herders to participate in sustainable grassland ecological compensation, leading to the emergence of a cooperation equilibrium among herders. (2) In this new strategy, the total contributions of herders are inversely proportional to herders’ “reputation tolerance”, and they are directly proportional to herders’ “income level”, “total budget” and “satisfaction and emotion”. The cooperation level is inversely proportional to “reputation tolerance” and “income level” and directly proportional to “total budget” and “satisfaction and emotion”. (3) The advantage of this new strategy is that it is robust to changes in the exogenous coefficient. Our research contributes to the application of the PGG model in the sustainable development of various resources and developing new approaches to mitigating “the tragedy of the commons”.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinghu Liao & Wenwen Dong & Boxin Zhao, 2023. "A New Strategy to Solve “the Tragedy of the Commons” in Sustainable Grassland Ecological Compensation: Experience from Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9222-:d:1165833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9222/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9222/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choi, Jung-Kyoo & Ahn, T.K., 2013. "Strategic reward and altruistic punishment support cooperation in a public goods game experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 17-30.
    2. Rui Cong & Bin Wu & Yuanying Qiu & Long Wang, 2012. "Evolution of Cooperation Driven by Reputation-Based Migration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-7, May.
    3. Cao, Xian-Bin & Du, Wen-Bo & Rong, Zhi-Hai, 2010. "The evolutionary public goods game on scale-free networks with heterogeneous investment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(6), pages 1273-1280.
    4. Huang, Keke & Zheng, Xiaoping & Yang, Yeqing & Wang, Tao, 2015. "Behavioral evolution in evacuation crowd based on heterogeneous rationality of small groups," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 501-506.
    5. Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gachter, 2010. "Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 541-556, March.
    6. Manfred Milinski & Dirk Semmann & Hans-Jürgen Krambeck, 2002. "Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6870), pages 424-426, January.
    7. Duncan J. Watts & Steven H. Strogatz, 1998. "Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6684), pages 440-442, June.
    8. Hu, Yuanning & Huang, Jikun & Hou, Lingling, 2019. "Impacts of the Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy on Household Livestock Production in China: An Empirical Study in Inner Mongolia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 248-256.
    9. Zhang, Haifeng & Yang, Hanxin & Du, Wenbo & Wang, Binghong & Cao, Xianbin, 2010. "Evolutionary public goods games on scale-free networks with unequal payoff allocation mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(5), pages 1099-1104.
    10. Dirk Semmann & Hans-Jürgen Krambeck & Manfred Milinski, 2003. "Volunteering leads to rock–paper–scissors dynamics in a public goods game," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6956), pages 390-393, September.
    11. Xiaomin Lv & Guangsheng Zhou, 2018. "Climatic Suitability of the Geographic Distribution of Stipa breviflora in Chinese Temperate Grassland under Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Martin A. Nowak & Akira Sasaki & Christine Taylor & Drew Fudenberg, 2004. "Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 646-650, April.
    13. Zheng, Xinyi & Zhang, Junze & Cao, Shixiong, 2018. "Net value of grassland ecosystem services in mainland China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 94-101.
    14. Francisco C. Santos & Marta D. Santos & Jorge M. Pacheco, 2008. "Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7201), pages 213-216, July.
    15. Chin‐Hwa Lu & Chung‐Hua Shen & Meng‐Wen Wu & Zhi‐Wen Wu, 2010. "Cooperation Satisfaction and Performance: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Banks and Their Foreign Strategic Investors," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 18(6), pages 90-108, November.
    16. Kingsley, David C. & Liu, Benyuan, 2014. "Cooperation across payoff equivalent public good and common pool resource experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 79-84.
    17. Christoph Hauert & Michael Doebeli, 2004. "Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 643-646, April.
    18. McIntosh, Craig & Sadoulet, Elisabeth & Buck, Steven & Rosada, Tomas, 2013. "Reputation in a public goods game: Taking the design of credit bureaus to the lab," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 270-285.
    19. Wirl, Franz, 1996. "Can Leviathan Governments Mitigate the Tragedy of the Commons?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 87(3-4), pages 363-377, June.
    20. Huang, Lin & Shao, Quanqin & Liu, Jiyuan & Lu, Qingshui, 2018. "Improving ecological conservation and restoration through payment for ecosystem services in Northeastern Tibetan Plateau, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 181-193.
    21. Yu Zhang & Juanle Wang & Yi Wang & Altansukh Ochir & Chuluun Togtokh, 2022. "Land Cover Change Analysis to Assess Sustainability of Development in the Mongolian Plateau over 30 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    22. LIU, Tianping & MIAO, Yanjun & SUN, Qianlu, 2016. "Core Issues in Design of Tibetan Grassland Ecological Compensation Mechanism," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 8(12), pages 1-4, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2017. "Publishing the donation list incompletely promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 310(C), pages 48-56.
    2. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019. "Cleverly handling the donation information can promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 363-373.
    3. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Individual choice and reputation distribution of cooperative behaviors among heterogeneous groups," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 39-46.
    4. Peng Lu & Xiaoping Zheng, 2015. "Social Stratification and Cooperative Behavior in Spatial Prisoners' Dilemma Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Lu, Peng & Wang, Fang, 2015. "Heterogeneity of inferring reputation probability in cooperative behaviors for the spatial prisoners’ dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 433(C), pages 367-378.
    6. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Imitating winner or sympathizing loser? Quadratic effects on cooperative behavior in prisoners’ dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 327-337.
    7. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Learn good from bad: Effects of good and bad neighbors in spatial prisoners’ dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 351-358.
    8. Quan, Ji & Yang, Xiukang & Wang, Xianjia, 2018. "Spatial public goods game with continuous contributions based on Particle Swarm Optimization learning and the evolution of cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 973-983.
    9. Zha, Jiajing & Li, Cong & Fan, Suohai, 2022. "The effect of stability-based strategy updating on cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    10. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Reputation evaluation with tolerance and reputation-dependent imitation on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Wang, Yongjie & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao & Si, Guangrun, 2017. "Emotional decisions in structured populations for the evolution of public cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 475-481.
    12. Zhenghong Wu & Yang Sun, 2022. "How to Treat Gossip in Internet Public Carbon Emission Reduction Projects?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Yao Meng & Sean P. Cornelius & Yang-Yu Liu & Aming Li, 2024. "Dynamics of collective cooperation under personalised strategy updates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Te Wu & Feng Fu & Long Wang, 2011. "Moving Away from Nasty Encounters Enhances Cooperation in Ecological Prisoner's Dilemma Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-7, November.
    15. Jorge Peña & Yannick Rochat, 2012. "Bipartite Graphs as Models of Population Structures in Evolutionary Multiplayer Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    16. Ping Zhu & Guiyi Wei, 2014. "Stochastic Heterogeneous Interaction Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.
    17. Fan, Ruguo & Zhang, Yingqing & Luo, Ming & Zhang, Hongjuan, 2017. "Promotion of cooperation induced by heterogeneity of both investment and payoff allocation in spatial public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 454-463.
    18. Zou, Kuan & Han, Wenchen & Zhang, Lan & Huang, Changwei, 2024. "The spatial public goods game on hypergraphs with heterogeneous investment," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    19. Sun, Jiaqin & Fan, Ruguo & Luo, Ming & Zhang, Yingqing & Dong, Lili, 2018. "The evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with dynamic relationship-based preferential learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 598-611.
    20. Yu, Fengyuan & Wang, Jianwei & He, Jialu, 2022. "Inequal dependence on members stabilizes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9222-:d:1165833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.