IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6129-d818280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Cover Change Analysis to Assess Sustainability of Development in the Mongolian Plateau over 30 Years

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zhang

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China
    State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Juanle Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Yi Wang

    (National Science and Technology Infrastructure Center, Beijing 100862, China)

  • Altansukh Ochir

    (Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Department of Environment and Forest Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Institute for Sustainable Development, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar 14201, Mongolia)

  • Chuluun Togtokh

    (Institute for Sustainable Development, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar 14201, Mongolia)

Abstract

The changes in land cover patterns in the Mongolian Plateau can reveal the regional status of sustainable development. Based on land cover data from 1990–2020, the study reveals the process of land cover change on the Mongolian plateau and integrates those changes with UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to further evaluate regional sustainable development status. Result revealed there is a stable rate of land cover change (0.16%) for the Mongolian Plateau, but with diverse shifting trends for various land cover types and SDGs indicators in past 30 years. Croplands (SDG2) showed a growth trend in the last five years, which was different from its initial obviously decreasing trend. The status of water (SDG6) showed a clear decreasing trend, which presents a major threat to this arid-to-semi-arid region. The built area (SDG11) increased continuously, but the long upward trend has slowed in recent years. The forest area (SDG15) declined, but it has recently recovered. Grasslands showed diverse changes in various steppe types (including real, meadow, and desert steppe types) while still experiencing land degradation. The expansion of sand areas presents a hidden risk of increasing sandstorms. Comparative analysis revealed that there have clear differences between Mongolia and Inner Mongolia due to the various government policies. In general, the land use degree in Mongolian Plateau increased annually. This indicated that the climate change and human activities have more and more influences, and it is still facing severe challenges for specific SDGs indicators in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zhang & Juanle Wang & Yi Wang & Altansukh Ochir & Chuluun Togtokh, 2022. "Land Cover Change Analysis to Assess Sustainability of Development in the Mongolian Plateau over 30 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6129-:d:818280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baolei Zhang & Qiaoyun Zhang & Chaoyang Feng & Qingyu Feng & Shumin Zhang, 2017. "Understanding Land Use and Land Cover Dynamics from 1976 to 2014 in Yellow River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qinghu Liao & Wenwen Dong & Boxin Zhao, 2023. "A New Strategy to Solve “the Tragedy of the Commons” in Sustainable Grassland Ecological Compensation: Experience from Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhiting Chen & Qing Ren & Tian Zhang & Zhewen Kang & Xiaoyan Huang & Peng Li & Xiaohu Dang & Xiaoshu Cao & Mingjiang Deng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Human Critical Area (HCA) in the “Three Water Lines” Region of Northwest China and the Impact of Socioeconomic Factors between 2000 and 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Monika Kopecká & Harini Nagendra & Andrew Millington, 2018. "Urban Land Systems: An Ecosystems Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-4, January.
    3. Jinquan Ai & Chao Zhang & Lijuan Chen & Dajun Li, 2020. "Mapping Annual Land Use and Land Cover Changes in the Yangtze Estuary Region Using an Object-Based Classification Framework and Landsat Time Series Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Shisi Tang & Laixi Song & Shiqi Wan & Yafei Wang & Yazhen Jiang & Jinfeng Liao, 2022. "Long-Time-Series Evolution and Ecological Effects of Coastline Length in Coastal Zone: A Case Study of the Circum-Bohai Coastal Zone, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Jean-François Mas & Rodrigo Nogueira de Vasconcelos & Washington Franca-Rocha, 2019. "Analysis of High Temporal Resolution Land Use/Land Cover Trajectories," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Henry Schubert & Andrés Caballero Calvo & Markus Rauchecker & Oscar Rojas-Zamora & Grischa Brokamp & Brigitta Schütt, 2018. "Assessment of Land Cover Changes in the Hinterland of Barranquilla (Colombia) Using Landsat Imagery and Logistic Regression," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6129-:d:818280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.