IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8302-d1151073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Performance of a SME in the Cutlery Sector Using Lean Thinking and Digital Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • José Dinis-Carvalho

    (Algoritmi Research Centre/LASI, Production and Systems Department, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimaraes, Portugal)

  • Rui M. Sousa

    (Algoritmi Research Centre/LASI, Production and Systems Department, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimaraes, Portugal)

  • Inês Moniz

    (Algoritmi Research Centre/LASI, Production and Systems Department, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimaraes, Portugal)

  • Helena Macedo

    (Algoritmi Research Centre/LASI, Production and Systems Department, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimaraes, Portugal)

  • Rui M. Lima

    (Algoritmi Research Centre/LASI, Production and Systems Department, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimaraes, Portugal)

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to show that if three specific contextual factors are present in a company, it is possible to achieve great performance improvements with a lean and industry 4.0 implementation. In terms of research methods, a case study was carried out of a project to implement digitalization and Lean practices in a cutlery company, which in fact encompassed a project of master’s degree in engineering and industrial management. Thus, the research question is: “It is possible to achieve major improvements in a lean and industry 4.0 implementation if three specific contextual factors are present in the company, namely (i) commitment of top management, (ii) knowledge on digitalization and lean, and (iii) very low Value-Added Ratio?”. Regarding the company project, action-research was adopted, and the project team began by mapping and diagnosing the production processes of the two product families (knives and spoons/forks). High levels of work in process, long throughput times, poor flow planning and control, and high stocks of finished products, quickly stood out in both families. Improvement proposals were developed and implemented, namely: (i) creation of a production scheduling and control system, (ii) improvement of the warehouse stock management system, and (iii) adoption of new routines, management tools, visual management, and kaizen meetings. The results achieved were excellent (e.g., throughput time reduced by 27.6% and productivity increased by 36.5%) and aligned with Sustainable Development Goals SDG 9 and 12. The findings of this study corroborate that exceptional results in the company performance can be achieved through a lean and industry 4.0 intervention, if the three referred contextual factors occur.

Suggested Citation

  • José Dinis-Carvalho & Rui M. Sousa & Inês Moniz & Helena Macedo & Rui M. Lima, 2023. "Improving the Performance of a SME in the Cutlery Sector Using Lean Thinking and Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8302-:d:1151073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8302/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8302/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lidia Sanchez-Ruiz & Beatriz Blanco, 2016. "How Do Companies Implement Process Management? The Case of Cantabrian Companies," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9, 01-2016.
    2. Rita Martinho & Jéssica Lopes & Diogo Jorge & Luís Caldas de Oliveira & Carlos Henriques & Paulo Peças, 2022. "IoT Based Automatic Diagnosis for Continuous Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2018. "Investments in big data analytics and firm performance: an empirical investigation of direct and mediating effects," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(15), pages 5206-5221, August.
    4. Karishma M. Qureshi & Bhavesh. G. Mewada & Saleh Y. Alghamdi & Naif Almakayeel & Mohamed Rafik N. Qureshi & Mohamed Mansour, 2022. "Accomplishing Sustainability in Manufacturing System for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) through Lean Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Griffiths, Andrew, 2010. "Corporate sustainability and organizational culture," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 357-366, October.
    6. Wadhah Abualfaraa & Konstantinos Salonitis & Ahmed Al-Ashaab & Maher Ala’raj, 2020. "Lean-Green Manufacturing Practices and Their Link with Sustainability: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Stefan Schaltegger & Marcus Wagner, 2011. "Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 222-237, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Flávio Cunha & José Dinis-Carvalho & Rui M. Sousa, 2024. "Assessment of Performance Measurement Systems’ Ability to Mitigate or Eliminate Typical Barriers Compromising Organisational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanica P. Dimitrova, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation – the Meaningful Connection," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 89-108.
    2. Linda Westman & Christopher Luederitz & Aravind Kundurpi & Alexander Julian Mercado & Olaf Weber & Sarah Lynne Burch, 2019. "Conceptualizing businesses as social actors: A framework for understanding sustainability actions in small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 388-402, February.
    3. I. E. Nikolaou & K. Tasopoulou & K. Tsagarakis, 2018. "A Typology of Green Entrepreneurs Based on Institutional and Resource-based Views," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 27(1), pages 111-132, March.
    4. Chin‐jung Luan & Chengli Tien & Pei‐hua Wu, 2013. "Strategizing Environmental Policy and Compliance for Firm Economic Sustainability: Evidence from Taiwanese Electronics Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 517-546, December.
    5. Ioana Gutu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Alexandru Tugui, 2023. "Assessment of a Workforce Sustainability Tool through Leadership and Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-30, January.
    6. Nosheena Yasir & Nasir Mahmood & Hafiz Shakir Mehmood & Osama Rashid & An Liren, 2021. "The Integrated Role of Personal Values and Theory of Planned Behavior to Form a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Ahmad Ibrahim Aljumah & Mohammed T. Nuseir & Md. Mahmudul Alam, 2021. "Traditional marketing analytics, big data analytics and big data system quality and the success of new product development," Post-Print hal-03538161, HAL.
    8. Gutierrez, I. & Alcaraz, J.M. & Susaeta, L. & Suarez, E. & Pin , José Ramón, 2015. "Managing Sustainability for Competitive Advantage: Evidence From the Hospitality Industry," IESE Research Papers D/1115, IESE Business School.
    9. Mina Nasiri & Minna Saunila & Tero Rantala & Juhani Ukko, 2022. "Sustainable innovation among small businesses: The role of digital orientation, the external environment, and company characteristics," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 703-712, August.
    10. Olufunke P. Adebayo & Rowland E. Worlu & Chinonye L. Moses & Olaleke O. Ogunnaike, 2020. "An Integrated Organisational Culture for Sustainable Environmental Performance in the Nigerian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Catherine Le Roux & Marius Pretorius, 2016. "Conceptualizing the Limiting Issues Inhibiting Sustainability Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2014. "Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 214-222.
    13. Anna Horzela & Jakub Semrau, 2021. "Using Tools to Improve Logistics and Production Processes in a Selected Construction Company," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 1211-1232.
    14. Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alrawad, Mahmaod & Alsyouf, Adi & Almaiah, Mohammed Amin & Al-Khasawneh, Ahmad & Al-Khasawneh, Akif Lutfi & Alshira'h, Ahmad Farhan & Alshirah, Malek Hamed & Saad, Mohamed & Ibrahim, 2023. "Drivers and impact of big data analytic adoption in the retail industry: A quantitative investigation applying structural equation modeling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    15. Luther Yuong Qai Chong & Thien Sang Lim, 2022. "Pull and Push Factors of Data Analytics Adoption and Its Mediating Role on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Veland Ramadani & Sucheta Agarwal & Andrea Caputo & Vivek Agrawal & Jitendra Kumar Dixit, 2022. "Sustainable competencies of social entrepreneurship for sustainable development: Exploratory analysis from a developing economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3437-3453, November.
    17. Ikramul Hasan & M. Nazmul Islam, 2022. "Leadership instills organizational effectiveness: a viewpoint on business organizations," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Tongyu Meng & Jamie Newth & Christine Woods, 2022. "Ethical Sensemaking in Impact Investing: Reasons and Motives in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1091-1117, September.
    19. Viju Raghupathi & Jie Ren & Wullianallur Raghupathi, 2020. "Identifying Corporate Sustainability Issues by Analyzing Shareholder Resolutions: A Machine-Learning Text Analytics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Nadine Székely & Jan vom Brocke, 2017. "What can we learn from corporate sustainability reporting? Deriving propositions for research and practice from over 9,500 corporate sustainability reports published between 1999 and 2015 using topic ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8302-:d:1151073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.