IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8019-d1147139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges to the Implementation of BIM for the Risk Management of Oil and Gas Construction Projects: Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ahsan Waqar

    (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University Technology PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

  • Idris Othman

    (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University Technology PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

  • Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano

    (Department of Architecture and Design, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Montepríncipe Campus, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, 28668 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Building Information Modeling (BIM) has become increasingly popular in the construction industry as a way to enhance risk management. However, little attention has been paid to the challenges of using BIM for safety management in Malaysia’s oil and gas construction sector, which is particularly hazardous and requires effective safety management to complete projects successfully. This study aims to identify the obstacles to using BIM for safety management in Malaysia’s oil and gas construction sector and to understand the root causes of resistance to its adoption. Exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were conducted on survey data collected from industry professionals. The study found that knowledge obstacles, creative hurdles, technical barriers, supervisory barriers, and functional barriers are the most significant challenges hindering the widespread adoption of BIM for safety management. These challenges were confirmed to significantly affect BIM adoption for safety management. The study’s findings have important implications for policymakers, industry practitioners, and academics seeking to improve safety management in Malaysia’s oil and gas construction sector through the use of BIM. Future research could explore additional variables that may impact BIM adoption for safety management in this sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2023. "Challenges to the Implementation of BIM for the Risk Management of Oil and Gas Construction Projects: Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8019-:d:1147139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8019/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8019/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Tasmin & M. H. Muazu & A. H. Nor Aziati & N. L. Zohadi, 2020. "The mediating effect of enterprise risk management implementation on operational excellence in the Malaysian oil and gas sector: a conceptual framework," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-6, December.
    2. Daekyoung Yi & Eul-Bum Lee & Junyong Ahn, 2019. "Onshore Oil and Gas Design Schedule Management Process Through Time-Impact Simulations Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Kalinga Jagoda & Patrick Wojcik, 2019. "Implementation of risk management and corporate sustainability in the Canadian oil and gas industry," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 381-398, September.
    4. Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Juan Carlos Pomares, 2023. "Impact of 3D Printing on the Overall Project Success of Residential Construction Projects Using Structural Equation Modelling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Ahsan Waqar & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Wesam Salah Alaloul, 2023. "Barriers to Building Information Modeling (BIM) Deployment in Small Construction Projects: Malaysian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-30, January.
    6. Tze San Ong & Teh Boon Heng & Nuranisma Ahmad & Haslinah Muhamad, 2015. "Relation between Corporate Governance Attributes and Financial Performance in Oil and Gas Industries," Institutions and Economies (formerly known as International Journal of Institutions and Economies), Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, vol. 7(2), pages 56-84, July.
    7. Myung-Hun Kim & Eul-Bum Lee & Han-Suk Choi, 2018. "Detail Engineering Completion Rating Index System (DECRIS) for Optimal Initiation of Construction Works to Improve Contractors’ Schedule-Cost Performance for Offshore Oil and Gas EPC Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-31, July.
    8. Ali Emami Meibodi & Atefeh Taklif & Hamidreza Arbab & Hassan Bovairi Monji, 2020. "Investigating the Effects of Contractual Factors and Arrangements on the Optimum Level of Production in Oil and Gas Projects: Evidence from the South Pars Phases 17 & 18," Iranian Economic Review (IER), Faculty of Economics,University of Tehran.Tehran,Iran, vol. 24(1), pages 181-223, Winter.
    9. Kraidi, Layth & Shah, Raj & Matipa, Wilfred & Borthwick, Fiona, 2019. "Analyzing the critical risk factors associated with oil and gas pipeline projects in Iraq," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 14-22.
    10. Sanmugam Annamalah & Murali Raman & Govindan Marthandan & Aravindan Kalisri Logeswaran, 2018. "Implementation of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework in Enhancing Business Performances in Oil and Gas Sector," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Ruchita Gupta & Biswadeepak Das & Karuna Jain, 2021. "Risk management of oil refinery construction project: an Indian case study," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 218-244.
    12. Choi, Bongseok & Kim, Seon Tae, 2018. "Price volatility and risk management of oil and gas companies: Evidence from oil and gas project finance deals," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 594-605.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dorota Janisio-Pawłowska & Wojciech Pawłowski, 2024. "Implementation of BIM Data in CityGML—Research and Perspectives for Creating a QGIS Plugin for Spatial Analysis: Experience from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-24, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Nasir Shafiq & Hasim Altan & Bertug Ozarisoy, 2023. "Modeling the Effect of Overcoming the Barriers to Passive Design Implementation on Project Sustainability Building Success: A Structural Equation Modeling Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Min-Ji Park & Eul-Bum Lee & Seung-Yeab Lee & Jong-Hyun Kim, 2021. "A Digitalized Design Risk Analysis Tool with Machine-Learning Algorithm for EPC Contractor’s Technical Specifications Assessment on Bidding," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-31, September.
    3. Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Valentina Diana Rusu & Silvia Avasilcai, 2021. "Performance Management for Growth: A Framework Based on EVA," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Herlina Lusmeida & Yvonne Augustine, 2022. "The effect of enterprise risks management, innovation towards sustainable finance moderated by intellectual capital," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 29(1), pages 481-496, March.
    5. Songling Yang & Muhammad Ishtiaq & Muhammad Anwar, 2018. "Enterprise Risk Management Practices and Firm Performance, the Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage and the Moderating Role of Financial Literacy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Rahayati Ahmad & Roshima Said & Syahiza Arsad, 2017. "The Board Governance Mechanism and the Effect of Concentration Ownership on Malaysia Companies Performance," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 757-768, February.
    7. Shengli, Liu & Yongtu, Liang, 2019. "Exploring the temporal structure of time series data for hazardous liquid pipeline incidents based on complex network theory," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    8. Wang, WuChang & Zhang, Yi & Li, YuXing & Hu, Qihui & Liu, Chengsong & Liu, Cuiwei, 2022. "Vulnerability analysis method based on risk assessment for gas transmission capabilities of natural gas pipeline networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    9. Xiafei Li & Dongxin Li & Xuhui Zhang & Guiwu Wei & Lan Bai & Yu Wei, 2021. "Forecasting regular and extreme gold price volatility: The roles of asymmetry, extreme event, and jump," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(8), pages 1501-1523, December.
    10. Guilherme Belloque & Martina K Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K Singh & Rui Xue, 2021. "55 years of Abacus: Evolution of Research Streams and Future Research Directions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 593-618, September.
    11. repec:thr:techub:10029:y:2022:i:1:p:481-496 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Chao Zhang & Wan Wang & Fengjiao Xu & Yong Chen & Tingxin Qin, 2022. "A Risk Treatment Strategy Model for Oil Pipeline Accidents Based on a Bayesian Decision Network Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Edosa Joshua Aronmwan & Sebastine Abhus Ogbaisi, 2022. "The nexus between standalone risk committees and tax aggressiveness: evidence from Nigeria," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Lyazzat Yespergenova & Aliya Dosmanbetova & Yengilik Baisheva & Dinmukhamed Zhakipbekov & Myrzabike Zhumabayeva & Alimshan Faizulayev, 2023. "The Factors that Drives the Cost Management Efficiency of Oil and Gas companies in Emerging Markets: The Case of Eurasian Economic Union," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(1), pages 328-334, January.
    15. Byung-Yun Son & Eul-Bum Lee, 2019. "Using Text Mining to Estimate Schedule Delay Risk of 13 Offshore Oil and Gas EPC Case Studies During the Bidding Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    16. Myung-Hun Kim & Eul-Bum Lee, 2019. "A Forecast Model for the Level of Engineering Maturity Impact on Contractor’s Procurement and Construction Costs for Offshore EPC Megaprojects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Jihong Ye & Yiyang Fang & Xinxiang Yang, 2022. "Vulnerability Analysis of Harbor Oil Pipeline Affected by Typhoon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Yin Junjia & Aidi Hizami Alias & Nuzul Azam Haron & Nabilah Abu Bakar, 2023. "A Bibliometric Review on Safety Risk Assessment of Construction Based on CiteSpace Software and WoS Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Su Jin Choi & So Won Choi & Jong Hyun Kim & Eul-Bum Lee, 2021. "AI and Text-Mining Applications for Analyzing Contractor’s Risk in Invitation to Bid (ITB) and Contracts for Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    20. Svetlana V. Ratner & Evgenii Yu. Khrustalev & Sergey N. Larin & Oleg E. Khrustalev, 2020. "Does the Development of Renewable Energy and Smart Grids Pose Risks for Russian Gas Projects? Scenario Forecast for Partner Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 286-293.
    21. Mihaela Brindușa TUDOSE & Valentina Diana RUSU & Silvia AVASILCĂI, 2020. "Measuring Financial Performance: Financial Ratios Vs. Economic Value Added," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7, pages 172-188.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8019-:d:1147139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.