IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9504-d1511803.html

Key Factors for Building Information Modelling Implementation in the Context of Environmental, Social, and Governance and Sustainable Development Goals Integration: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Wu Jing

    (Faculty of Engineering and Technology Infrastructure, Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur, De Centrum City, Kajang 43000, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
    School of Architecture and Road & Bridge Engineering, Guangxi Eco-Engineering Vocational and Technical College, Liuzhou 545004, China)

  • Aidi Hizami Alias

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43300, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia)

Abstract

Driven by global sustainability trends, Building Information Modelling (BIM) technology is increasingly becoming a key tool in the construction industry to improve efficiency and sustainability. This study aims to identify the key factors affecting BIM implementation in the context of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and to construct a theoretical framework for BIM implementation based on these factors. To achieve this objective, this study used a systematic literature review (SLR) method to systematically review the relevant literature between 2009 and 2024 and identified 16 key factors from the selected 406 studies through keyword co-occurrence analysis (using VOSviewer 1.6.20) and data coding. These key factors include top management support for ESG and SDGs, alignment of SDGs, ESG integration, technical support, BIM software, BIM hardware, structural adjustment and collaboration, capacity building, change management, skill and attitude, educational training and development, incentive mechanism, roles and responsibilities, sustainable construction practices, policies and regulations, and resource efficiency. This study categorises these factors under the Strategy, Technology, Organisation, People, Environment (STOPE) framework and proposes a theoretical implementation framework for BIM accordingly. The findings not only provide a practical guiding framework for the sustainable development of construction companies in the context of ESG and SDG integration but also lay a solid theoretical foundation for future empirical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu Jing & Aidi Hizami Alias, 2024. "Key Factors for Building Information Modelling Implementation in the Context of Environmental, Social, and Governance and Sustainable Development Goals Integration: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-29, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9504-:d:1511803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    2. Chau Kwong Wing, 1997. "The ranking of construction management journals," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 387-398.
    3. Gökhan Demirdöğen & Nihan Sena Diren & Hande Aladağ & Zeynep Işık, 2021. "Lean Based Maturity Framework Integrating Value, BIM and Big Data Analytics: Evidence from AEC Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Najjar, Mohammad & Figueiredo, Karoline & Hammad, Ahmed W.A. & Haddad, Assed, 2019. "Integrated optimization with building information modeling and life cycle assessment for generating energy efficient buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1366-1382.
    5. Robert G. Eccles & George Serafeim, 2013. "A Tale of Two Stories: Sustainability and the Quarterly Earnings Call," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 25(3), pages 8-19, September.
    6. Ashwag Madkhali & Seedwell T. M. Sithole, 2023. "Exploring the Role of Information Technology in Supporting Sustainability Efforts in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Ibukun O. Famakin & Idris Othman & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Oludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju & Mohammed Magdy Hamed & Taiwo Matthew Olayemi, 2023. "Building Information Modeling Execution Drivers for Sustainable Building Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Ahsan Waqar & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Wesam Salah Alaloul, 2023. "Barriers to Building Information Modeling (BIM) Deployment in Small Construction Projects: Malaysian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-30, January.
    9. Shuvo Dip Datta & Bassam A. Tayeh & Ibrahim Y. Hakeem & Yazan I. Abu Aisheh, 2023. "Benefits and Barriers of Implementing Building Information Modeling Techniques for Sustainable Practices in the Construction Industry—A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    10. Shabir Hussain Khahro & Danish Kumar & Fida Hussain Siddiqui & Tauha Hussain Ali & Muhammad Saleem Raza & Ali Raza Khoso, 2021. "Optimizing Energy Use, Cost and Carbon Emission through Building Information Modelling and a Sustainability Approach: A Case-Study of a Hospital Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Maged Abdel-Tawab & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Nicholas Chileshe & Henry Abanda & Ali Hassan Ali & Avar Almukhtar, 2023. "Building Information Modelling Implementation Model for Sustainable Building Projects in Developing Countries: A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Margherita Pero & Antonella Moretto & Eleonora Bottani & Barbara Bigliardi, 2017. "Environmental Collaboration for Sustainability in the Construction Industry: An Exploratory Study in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Yeaw Chong Seow, 2026. "Navigating the Convergence of SDGs and ESG: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 38(2), pages 289-324, April.
    2. Zhou, Jingfeng & Li, Jiantong & Xie, Jiayu & Dong, Xinqiao & Wang, Kaixuan & Jing, Rui & Tang, Rui & Wang, Meng, 2025. "State-of-the-art review of urban building energy modelling on supporting sustainable development goals," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 402(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Kaiser, 2020. "ESG integration: value, growth and momentum," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 32-51, February.
    2. Ahmed Osama Daoud & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ali Hassan Ali & Mohamed Elseknidy, 2025. "Empowering Sustainable Infrastructure and Sustainable Development Goals Through Industry 5.0 Implementation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 4309-4332, June.
    3. DasGupta, Ranjan & Roy, Arup, 2023. "Firm environmental, social, governance and financial performance relationship contradictions: Insights from institutional environment mediation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Ichev, Riste & Valentinčič, Aljoša, 2025. "The effect of impact investing on performance of private firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    5. Nuria Padilla‐Garrido & Francisco Aguado‐Correa & Inmaculada Rabadán‐Martín & José María López‐Jiménez & Juan José de la Vega‐Jiménez & Ignacio Peletier‐Ribera, 2024. "Materiality analysis in sustainability reporting: Insights from large Spanish companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5391-5412, November.
    6. Benedek Kiss & Jose Dinis Silvestre & Rita Andrade Santos & Zsuzsa Szalay, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Optimisation of Buildings in Portugal and Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Marta Szczepańczyk & Paweł Nowodziński & Adam Sikorski, 2023. "ESG Strategy and Financial Aspects Using the Example of an Oil and Gas Midstream Company: The UNIMOT Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Preeti Sharma & Priyanka Panday & R. C. Dangwal, 2020. "Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 208-217, December.
    9. Won-Kyu Lim & Cheong-Kyu Park, 2022. "Mandating Gender Diversity and the Value Relevance of Sustainable Development Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Choi, Gahyun & Park, Kwangyeol & Yi, Eojin & Ahn, Kwangwon, 2023. "Price fairness: Clean energy stocks and the overall market," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Mohamed Rashwan & Nardin Farouk & Rania Pasha, 2025. "Can ESG Strategies Drive Firm Value Growth in the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.
    12. Tan, Yeng-May & Szulczyk, Kenneth & Sii, Yew-Hei, 2023. "Performance of ESG-integrated smart beta strategies in Asia-Pacific stock markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Mi Sook Lee, 2024. "The relationship between green innovation and sustainable growth in Korean companies: Moderated mediation effect of ESG score by industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2797-2810, June.
    14. Freundt, Jana & Lange, Andreas, 2021. "On the voluntary provision of public goods under risk," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    15. Willem Schramade, 2016. "Integrating ESG into valuation models and investment decisions: the value-driver adjustment approach," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 95-111, April.
    16. van Weeren, Michelle & Bluntz, Clarence, 2025. "What makes a rating useable? Shifting epistemic practices in the ESG rating field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    17. Rami Salem & Musa Ghazwani & Waleed Alshaer, 2025. "ESG Performance–Stock Price Volatility Nexus: The Moderating Effect of Board Cultural Diversity in G20 Markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 8172-8193, November.
    18. Florian Kiesel & Felix Lücke, 2019. "ESG in credit ratings and the impact on financial markets," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 263-290, August.
    19. Guerrero-Escobar, Santiago & Hernández-del-Valle, Gerardo & Hernández-Vega, Marco, 2025. "The stock market effects of committing and setting GHG targets: evidence from the science-based targets initiative," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    20. K. Thomas Liaw, 2020. "Survey of Green Bond Pricing and Investment Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9504-:d:1511803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.