IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9504-d1511803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Factors for Building Information Modelling Implementation in the Context of Environmental, Social, and Governance and Sustainable Development Goals Integration: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Wu Jing

    (Faculty of Engineering and Technology Infrastructure, Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur, De Centrum City, Kajang 43000, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
    School of Architecture and Road & Bridge Engineering, Guangxi Eco-Engineering Vocational and Technical College, Liuzhou 545004, China)

  • Aidi Hizami Alias

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43300, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia)

Abstract

Driven by global sustainability trends, Building Information Modelling (BIM) technology is increasingly becoming a key tool in the construction industry to improve efficiency and sustainability. This study aims to identify the key factors affecting BIM implementation in the context of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and to construct a theoretical framework for BIM implementation based on these factors. To achieve this objective, this study used a systematic literature review (SLR) method to systematically review the relevant literature between 2009 and 2024 and identified 16 key factors from the selected 406 studies through keyword co-occurrence analysis (using VOSviewer 1.6.20) and data coding. These key factors include top management support for ESG and SDGs, alignment of SDGs, ESG integration, technical support, BIM software, BIM hardware, structural adjustment and collaboration, capacity building, change management, skill and attitude, educational training and development, incentive mechanism, roles and responsibilities, sustainable construction practices, policies and regulations, and resource efficiency. This study categorises these factors under the Strategy, Technology, Organisation, People, Environment (STOPE) framework and proposes a theoretical implementation framework for BIM accordingly. The findings not only provide a practical guiding framework for the sustainable development of construction companies in the context of ESG and SDG integration but also lay a solid theoretical foundation for future empirical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu Jing & Aidi Hizami Alias, 2024. "Key Factors for Building Information Modelling Implementation in the Context of Environmental, Social, and Governance and Sustainable Development Goals Integration: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-29, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9504-:d:1511803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chau Kwong Wing, 1997. "The ranking of construction management journals," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 387-398.
    2. Gökhan Demirdöğen & Nihan Sena Diren & Hande Aladağ & Zeynep Işık, 2021. "Lean Based Maturity Framework Integrating Value, BIM and Big Data Analytics: Evidence from AEC Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Najjar, Mohammad & Figueiredo, Karoline & Hammad, Ahmed W.A. & Haddad, Assed, 2019. "Integrated optimization with building information modeling and life cycle assessment for generating energy efficient buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1366-1382.
    4. Ibukun O. Famakin & Idris Othman & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Oludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju & Mohammed Magdy Hamed & Taiwo Matthew Olayemi, 2023. "Building Information Modeling Execution Drivers for Sustainable Building Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Ahsan Waqar & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Wesam Salah Alaloul, 2023. "Barriers to Building Information Modeling (BIM) Deployment in Small Construction Projects: Malaysian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-30, January.
    6. Shabir Hussain Khahro & Danish Kumar & Fida Hussain Siddiqui & Tauha Hussain Ali & Muhammad Saleem Raza & Ali Raza Khoso, 2021. "Optimizing Energy Use, Cost and Carbon Emission through Building Information Modelling and a Sustainability Approach: A Case-Study of a Hospital Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Margherita Pero & Antonella Moretto & Eleonora Bottani & Barbara Bigliardi, 2017. "Environmental Collaboration for Sustainability in the Construction Industry: An Exploratory Study in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    9. Robert G. Eccles & George Serafeim, 2013. "A Tale of Two Stories: Sustainability and the Quarterly Earnings Call," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 25(3), pages 8-19, September.
    10. Ashwag Madkhali & Seedwell T. M. Sithole, 2023. "Exploring the Role of Information Technology in Supporting Sustainability Efforts in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Shuvo Dip Datta & Bassam A. Tayeh & Ibrahim Y. Hakeem & Yazan I. Abu Aisheh, 2023. "Benefits and Barriers of Implementing Building Information Modeling Techniques for Sustainable Practices in the Construction Industry—A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    12. Maged Abdel-Tawab & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Nicholas Chileshe & Henry Abanda & Ali Hassan Ali & Avar Almukhtar, 2023. "Building Information Modelling Implementation Model for Sustainable Building Projects in Developing Countries: A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. DasGupta, Ranjan & Roy, Arup, 2023. "Firm environmental, social, governance and financial performance relationship contradictions: Insights from institutional environment mediation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Lars Kaiser, 2020. "ESG integration: value, growth and momentum," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 32-51, February.
    3. Ahmed Osama Daoud & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ali Hassan Ali & Mohamed Elseknidy, 2025. "Empowering Sustainable Infrastructure and Sustainable Development Goals Through Industry 5.0 Implementation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 4309-4332, June.
    4. Benedek Kiss & Jose Dinis Silvestre & Rita Andrade Santos & Zsuzsa Szalay, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Optimisation of Buildings in Portugal and Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Marta Szczepańczyk & Paweł Nowodziński & Adam Sikorski, 2023. "ESG Strategy and Financial Aspects Using the Example of an Oil and Gas Midstream Company: The UNIMOT Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Choi, Gahyun & Park, Kwangyeol & Yi, Eojin & Ahn, Kwangwon, 2023. "Price fairness: Clean energy stocks and the overall market," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Mi Sook Lee, 2024. "The relationship between green innovation and sustainable growth in Korean companies: Moderated mediation effect of ESG score by industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2797-2810, June.
    8. Willem Schramade, 2016. "Integrating ESG into valuation models and investment decisions: the value-driver adjustment approach," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 95-111, April.
    9. Florian Kiesel & Felix Lücke, 2019. "ESG in credit ratings and the impact on financial markets," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 263-290, August.
    10. K. Thomas Liaw, 2020. "Survey of Green Bond Pricing and Investment Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, August.
    11. Zhang, Dongyang, 2023. "Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    12. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Uyar, Ali & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "Do shareholders punish or reward excessive CSR engagement? Moderating effect of cash flow and firm growth," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Ballester, Laura & González-Urteaga, Ana & Shen, Long, 2024. "Green bond issuance and credit risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Simon Dikau & Nick Robins & Matthias Täger, 2019. "Building a sustainable financial system: the state of practice and future priorities," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue Autumn.
    15. Jinyi Li & Zhen Liu & Guizhong Han & Peter Demian & Mohamed Osmani, 2024. "The Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) Technologies for Sustainable Building in the Context of Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-38, December.
    16. Wong, Woei Chyuan & Batten, Jonathan A. & Ahmad, Abd Halim & Mohamed-Arshad, Shamsul Bahrain & Nordin, Sabariah & Adzis, Azira Abdul, 2021. "Does ESG certification add firm value?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    17. Danny Zhao‐Xiang Huang, 2022. "An integrated theory of the firm approach to environmental, social and governance performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1567-1598, April.
    18. Draganac, Dragana & Lu, Kelin, 2025. "Pricing asset beyond financial fundamentals: The impact of prosocial preference and image concerns," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Lisa Schopohl, 2020. "State Pension Funds and Corporate Social Responsibility: Do Beneficiaries’ Political Values Influence Funds’ Investment Decisions?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 489-516, September.
    20. Ali, Adnan & Faisal, Faisal & Zhakanova Isiksal, Aliya & Maktoumi, Iman Sulaiman Amur AL, 2025. "Do green finance and health expenditures lessen the ecological footprint to ensure sustainable development?," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9504-:d:1511803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.