IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p7923-d1145097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Technology Interface and Student Engagement Are Significant Stimuli in Sustainable Student Satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Alka Pandita

    (Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala 147004, India)

  • Ravi Kiran

    (Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala 147004, India)

Abstract

The technology interface and student engagement are important factors that can contribute to sustainable student satisfaction. Technology has become an integral part of the recent teaching–learning setup and it can significantly impact student satisfaction. Additionally, student engagement is vital for sustainable student satisfaction. Engaged students are more likely to take an active role in their education, participate in discussions, and ask questions. When students are engaged, they feel a sense of ownership over their learning experience, which can lead to higher levels of satisfaction. Therefore, educational institutions should strive to provide students with technology that is intuitive and easy to use and create an environment that fosters engagement and collaboration. By doing so, institutions can increase student satisfaction and improve overall academic outcomes. This research study was primarily conducted to understand the potential of the technology interface (TI) and student engagement (SE) in enhancing student satisfaction (SS). The study uses a survey to collect responses from 400 respondents from higher educational institutions (HEIs). PLS-SEM has been used to test the proposed hypothesis. Three dimensions of the technology interface (TI) include cyber infrastructure, quality of e-content, and technology-assisted facilities. It is essential to understand how the technology interface influences student engagement (SE) through three dimensions, viz. new skills development, active involvement, and academic achievements. The student satisfaction scale has an employability perspective, teaching perspective, and learning perspective as subscales. Initially, the study examines the influence of the technology interface on student engagement. The findings support a positive impact on student engagement. The next step was to study the direct effect of the technology interface on student satisfaction. The results lend support to a positive influence. An attempt was also made to investigate the mediation of student engagement between the technology interface and student satisfaction. The findings highlight that with the mediation of student engagement, the influence of the technology interface on student satisfaction is improved. This study is one of the pioneering empirical studies highlighting the importance of the technology interface on the mediation of student engagement in student satisfaction. Technology may be a prerequisite, but it needs to be translated to student satisfaction by using it with student engagement (new skills development, active involvement, and academic achievements). The study has meaningful implications for policymakers at universities to enable them to strategize around practices conducive to the implementation of technology, and for student engagement activities to enhance student satisfaction in higher education institutes (HEIs).

Suggested Citation

  • Alka Pandita & Ravi Kiran, 2023. "The Technology Interface and Student Engagement Are Significant Stimuli in Sustainable Student Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7923-:d:1145097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7923/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7923/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gulley, O. David & Jackson, Aaron L., 2016. "A case study on using instructor-recorded videos in an upper level economics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 28-33.
    2. Muhammad Qasim Memon & Yu Lu & Abdul Rehman Memon & Aasma Memon & Parveen Munshi & Syed Farman Ali Shah, 2022. "Does the Impact of Technology Sustain Students’ Satisfaction, Academic and Functional Performance: An Analysis via Interactive and Self-Regulated Learning?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Orchida Fayez & Burhan Ozfidan & Hala Ismail, 2023. "The Praxis of User Experience (UX) in the Design of Undergraduate Online Classes: Framing the Perceptions of Engineering and Social Sciences Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Rigdon, Edward E., 2016. "Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 598-605.
    5. Tommy Tanu Wijaya & Peijie Jiang & Mailizar Mailizar & Akhmad Habibi, 2022. "Predicting Factors Influencing Preservice Teachers’ Behavior Intention in the Implementation of STEM Education Using Partial Least Squares Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Ceyhan Aldemir & Yaprak Gülcan, 2004. "Student Satisfaction in Higher Education: A Turkish Case," Higher Education Management and Policy, OECD Publishing, vol. 16(2), pages 109-122.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanan Yu & Khairudin Bin Che Tak & Richard Peter Bailey & Nadia Samsudin & Ce Ren, 2025. "The Effects of Blended Learning on Learning Engagement in Physical Education Among University Students in China: The Mediating Role of Attitudes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Youzhi Zeng & Ning Zhang, 2025. "Research on the Effect of Economics and Management Major Teachers’ Teaching on Students’ Course Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Guoqing Lu & Qingtang Liu & Kui Xie & Chenwen Zhang & Xiangchun He & Yafei Shi, 2023. "Does the Seat Matter? The Influence of Seating Factors and Motivational Factors on Situational Engagement and Satisfaction in the Smart Classroom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Dong Wenlong & Samah Ali Mohsen Mofreh & Sultan Salem, 2024. "The Application and Impact of Smart Teaching Platform in TESOL: Perspectives From Junior High School Teachers," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(7), pages 120-120, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Luis Enrique Valdez-Juárez & José Luis Lizcano-Álvarez, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital: Sources of Competitiveness and Legitimacy in Organizations’ Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Sader, Myra & Chollet, Barthélemy & Brion, Sébastien & Trendel, Olivier, 2021. "Supported, detached, or marginalized? The ambivalent role of social capital on stress at work," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 768-778.
    3. Hengky Latan & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, 2019. "Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 289-304, March.
    4. Gema Albort-Morant & Jörg Henseler & Gabriel Cepeda-Carrión & Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, 2018. "Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity as Complementary Drivers of Green Product and Process Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Shaifali Chauhan & Richa Banerjee & Vishal Dagar, 2023. "Analysis of Impulse Buying Behaviour of Consumer During COVID-19: An Empirical Study," Millennial Asia, , vol. 14(2), pages 278-299, June.
    6. Corvello, Vincenzo & Felicetti, Alberto Michele & Ammirato, Salvatore & Troise, Ciro & Ključnikov, Aleksandr, 2024. "The rules of courtship: What drives a start-up to collaborate with a large company?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Carmen M. Felipe & José L. Roldán & Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, 2017. "Impact of Organizational Culture Values on Organizational Agility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Christian Nitzl & Wynne W. Chin, 2017. "The case of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling in managerial accounting research," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 137-156, May.
    9. Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa & Ringle, Christian M. & Jaafar, Mastura & Ramayah, T., 2017. "Urban vs. rural destinations: Residents’ perceptions, community participation and support for tourism development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 147-158.
    10. Krisana Visamitanan & Nuttapol Assarut, 2024. "Impact of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Employee Engagement and Organizational Commitment: Mediating Role of Firm Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(5), pages 1336-1355, October.
    11. Nor'Aini Yusof & Amin Akhavan Tabassi & Ernawati Mustafa Kamal, 2020. "Do environmental, economic and reputational advantages strengthen green practices' impact on environmental performance?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2081-2093, September.
    12. M. Rosario González‐Rodríguez & Iis Tussyadiah, 2022. "Sustainable development in nature‐based destinations. The social dilemma of an environmental policy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 580-594, August.
    13. Jessica Braojos & Jose Benitez & Javier Llorens & Laura Ruiz, 2020. "Impact of IT integration on the firm’s knowledge absorption and desorption," Post-Print hal-03160729, HAL.
    14. Richa N. Agarwal, 2020. "The Role Of Effective Factors In Utaut Model On Behavioral Intention," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(3), pages 5-23, September.
    15. Hengky Latan & Christian M. Ringle & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour, 2018. "Whistleblowing Intentions Among Public Accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the Moderation Effects," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 573-588, October.
    16. Sirkeci Kübra & Arıkan Esra, 2021. "The Infinite Wardrobe: Female Consumers’ Value Perceptions Regarding Collaborative Consumption of Apparel," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 150-170, December.
    17. Bhukya, Ramulu & Paul, Justin & Kastanakis, Minas & Robinson, Sarah, 2022. "Forty years of European Management Journal: A bibliometric overview," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 10-28.
    18. Tommy Tanu Wijaya & Imam Fitri Rahmadi & Siti Chotimah & Jailani Jailani & Dhoriva Urwatul Wutsqa, 2022. "A Case Study of Factors That Affect Secondary School Mathematics Achievement: Teacher-Parent Support, Stress Levels, and Students’ Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Miguel Reyna-Castillo & Alejandro Santiago & Ana Xóchitl Barrios-del-Ángel & Francisco Manuel García-Reyes & Fausto Balderas & José Ignacio Anchondo-Pérez, 2025. "Effect of Social Sustainability on Supply Chain Resilience Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Evolutionary Fuzzy Knowle," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-32, April.
    20. Joseph F. Hair & G. Tomas M. Hult & Christian M. Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2017. "Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 616-632, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7923-:d:1145097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.