IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4512-d790759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studying the Physiological Reactions of C 4 Grasses in Order to Select Them for Cultivation on Marginal Lands

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Steinhoff-Wrześniewska

    (Institute of Technology and Life Sciences–National Research Institute Falenty, 3 Hrabska Avenue, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Piotr Dąbrowski

    (Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Anna Paszkiewicz-Jasińska

    (Institute of Technology and Life Sciences–National Research Institute Falenty, 3 Hrabska Avenue, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Barbara Wróbel

    (Institute of Technology and Life Sciences–National Research Institute Falenty, 3 Hrabska Avenue, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Maria Strzelczyk

    (Institute of Technology and Life Sciences–National Research Institute Falenty, 3 Hrabska Avenue, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Marek Helis

    (Institute of Technology and Life Sciences–National Research Institute Falenty, 3 Hrabska Avenue, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Mohamed Hazem Kalaji

    (Institute of Technology and Life Sciences–National Research Institute Falenty, 3 Hrabska Avenue, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland
    Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

One of the problems of sustainable agricultural land management (SALM) is the competition between food production and biomass production. For this reason, marginal lands with unfavorable agrotechnical conditions have been proposed for non-food crops in recent years. To this end, a better understanding of the impact of environmental factors on crop development and yield is needed. The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of soil water availability on selected morphological, physiological and growth characteristics of four C 4 grass species ( Miscanthus × giganteus , Miscanthus sacchariflorus , Miscanthus sinensis and Spartina pectinate ) growing under different water and fertilizer conditions. A pot experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions with four grass species, three different water rates (100, 85 and 70%) and three fertilizer rates (270, 180 and 90 kg NPK ha −1 ). The study showed that water stress, regardless of plant species, increased the chlorophyll content index without affecting the photosynthetic efficiency of the plants. Water stress significantly decreased plant fresh and dry mass, shoot number and length, and shoot/leaf ratio. The response to water deficit depended on the plant species. Miscanthus sinensis was the most sensitive to water deficit and Spartina pectinate the most tolerant (reduction in dry mass of 41.5% and 18%, respectively). Water stress (85% and 70%) reduced the number and the length of shoots without affecting the average diameter of shoots of the tested grasses, resulting in a significant reduction in biomass production of plants grown under optimal conditions with mineral NPK fertilization (180 kg NPK ha −1 ). Miscanthus sacchariflorus showed the highest dry matter under the worst growing conditions (70% and 90 NPK) and therefore could be recommended for cultivation on marginal lands with unfavorable agrotechnical conditions. It should be emphasized that the high yield of this species was not due to the photosynthetic efficiency, but better growth stem parameters (length and number). It appears that, for long-term agricultural land management, it is preferable to determine fertilizer rates for each crop species based on soil water availability. It should also be emphasized that increasing the yield of potential lignocellulosic crops for energy purposes while reducing environmental impact appears to be one of the viable answers to the difficulties of conventional energy production.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Steinhoff-Wrześniewska & Piotr Dąbrowski & Anna Paszkiewicz-Jasińska & Barbara Wróbel & Maria Strzelczyk & Marek Helis & Mohamed Hazem Kalaji, 2022. "Studying the Physiological Reactions of C 4 Grasses in Order to Select Them for Cultivation on Marginal Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4512-:d:790759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4512/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4512/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marek Helis & Maria Strzelczyk & Wojciech Golimowski & Aleksandra Steinhoff-Wrześniewska & Anna Paszkiewicz-Jasińska & Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw & Adam Koniuszy & Marek Hryniewicz, 2021. "Biomass Potential of the Marginal Land of the Polish Sudetes Mountain Range," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Sarah Velten & Julia Leventon & Nicolas Jager & Jens Newig, 2015. "What Is Sustainable Agriculture? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-33, June.
    3. Michał Krzyżaniak & Mariusz J. Stolarski & Kazimierz Warmiński, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Giant Miscanthus: Production on Marginal Soil with Various Fertilisation Treatments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Mellor, P. & Lord, R.A. & João, E. & Thomas, R. & Hursthouse, A., 2021. "Identifying non-agricultural marginal lands as a route to sustainable bioenergy provision - A review and holistic definition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marek Helis & Maria Strzelczyk & Wojciech Golimowski & Aleksandra Steinhoff-Wrześniewska & Anna Paszkiewicz-Jasińska & Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw & Adam Koniuszy & Marek Hryniewicz, 2021. "Biomass Potential of the Marginal Land of the Polish Sudetes Mountain Range," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Piotr Sulewski, 2019. "Between the Social and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability in Rural Areas—In Search of Farmers’ Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Phélinas, Pascale & Choumert, Johanna, 2017. "Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 452-462.
    4. Muhammed Yasin Taskesenlioglu & Sezai Ercisli & Muhammed Kupe & Nazan Ercisli, 2022. "History of Grape in Anatolia and Historical Sustainable Grape Production in Erzincan Agroecological Conditions in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Monia El Akkari & Nosra Ben Fradj & Benoît Gabrielle & Sylvestre Njakou Djomo, 2023. "Spatially-explicit environmental assessment of bioethanol from miscanthus and switchgrass in France [Évaluation environnementale spatialement explicite du bioéthanol produit à partir de miscanthus ," Post-Print hal-04369771, HAL.
    6. Matteo Zavalloni & Meri Raggi & Davide Viaggi, 2016. "Assessing Collective Measures in Rural Policy: The Effect of Minimum Participation Rules on the Distribution of Benefits from Irrigation Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak, 2021. "Economic Evaluation of the Production of Perennial Crops for Energy Purposes—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Cecilia M. V. B. Almeida & Biagio F. Giannetti & Feni Agostinho & Gengyuan Liu & Zhifeng Yang, 2021. "What Are the Stimuli to Change to a Sustainable Post-COVID-19 Society?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Emilia Schmitt & Daniel Keech & Damian Maye & Dominique Barjolle & James Kirwan, 2016. "Comparing the Sustainability of Local and Global Food Chains: A Case Study of Cheese Products in Switzerland and the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Monika Hejna & Elisabetta Onelli & Alessandra Moscatelli & Maurizio Bellotto & Cinzia Cristiani & Nadia Stroppa & Luciana Rossi, 2021. "Heavy-Metal Phytoremediation from Livestock Wastewater and Exploitation of Exhausted Biomass," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Onwuadiochi, I. C & Onyeanusi, C. C & Mage, J. O., 2021. "Assessment Of Rainfall Variability For Sustainable Agriculture In Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria," Journal Clean WAS (JCleanWAS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 39-46, July.
    12. Jacqueline Loos & Henrik Von Wehrden, 2018. "Beyond Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing Constitutes Sustainable Agriculture in European Cultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-11, May.
    13. Thanh Ngo & Hai‐Dang Nguyen & Huong Ho & Vo‐Kien Nguyen & Thuy T. T. Dao & Hai T. H. Nguyen, 2021. "Assessing the important factors of sustainable agriculture development: An Indicateurs de Durabilité des Exploitations Agricoles‐Analytic Hierarchy Process study in the northern region of Vietnam," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 327-338, March.
    14. Stan Selbonne & Loïc Guindé & François Causeret & Pierre Chopin & Jorge Sierra & Régis Tournebize & Jean-Marc Blazy, 2023. "How to Measure the Performance of Farms with Regard to Climate-Smart Agriculture Goals? A Set of Indicators and Its Application in Guadeloupe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Lin Wang & Guofang Hu & Yaojie Yue & Xinyue Ye & Min Li & Jintao Zhao & Jinhong Wan, 2016. "GIS-Based Risk Assessment of Hail Disasters Affecting Cotton and Its Spatiotemporal Evolution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Mutaz Alshafeey & Asefeh Asemi & Omar Rashdan, 2018. "Industrial revolution 4.0, renewable energy: A content analysis," Proceedings of FIKUSZ 2018, in: Proceedings of FIKUSZ '18, pages 23-31, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    17. Ralph De Witte & Dirk Janssen & Samir Sayadi Gmada & Carmen García-García, 2023. "Best Practices for Training in Sustainable Greenhouse Horticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, March.
    18. Norman Siebrecht, 2020. "Sustainable Agriculture and Its Implementation Gap—Overcoming Obstacles to Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-27, May.
    19. Paul Hong & Balasudarsun N. L. & Vivek N. & Sathish M., 2022. "Sustainable Agricultural Business Model: Case Studies of Innovative Indian Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Rachel A. Bahn & Abed Al Kareem Yehya & Rami Zurayk, 2021. "Digitalization for Sustainable Agri-Food Systems: Potential, Status, and Risks for the MENA Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4512-:d:790759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.