IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2510-d755425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Tourists Really Care about Authenticity? A Study on Tourists’ Perceptions of Nature and Culture Authenticity

Author

Listed:
  • Li Li

    (Jangho Architecture College, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China)

  • Shasha Li

    (Jangho Architecture College, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China)

Abstract

The role that authenticity plays in tourism is debatable. Researchers have focused on the nature of authenticity, while the natural landscape is taken for granted as authentic. “Landscape” is the symbolic environment created by human acts of conferring meaning to nature and the environment. The concept of nature authenticity is proposed to enrich the connotation of authenticity. A structural equation model was used to analyze the relationships between motivation, perceived authenticity, destination image and satisfaction. The results indicate that perceived authenticity positively affects tourists’ perceptions of the destination image in both the context of nature (β = 0.51, p < 0.01) and the cultural context (β = 0.65, p < 0.01). Perceived authenticity also has positive effects on the satisfaction for both the natural (β = 0.42, p < 0.01) and cultural (β = 0.20, p < 0.01) aspects. Tourists valued both nature and culture authenticity in the Chinese context. As a newly emerged phenomenon, performing arts act as an effective way to demonstrate local culture and history. The moderating effect of a performing art show was discussed with model comparison. Tourists who watched the performing arts show thought highly of the authenticity of the destination, especially regarding the cultural aspect.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Li & Shasha Li, 2022. "Do Tourists Really Care about Authenticity? A Study on Tourists’ Perceptions of Nature and Culture Authenticity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2510-:d:755425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2510/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2510/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ketwadee Madden & Basri Rashid & Noor Azimin Zainol, 2016. "Beyond the motivation theory of destination image," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 22(2), pages 247-264, December.
    2. Di Tian & Qiongyao Wang & Rob Law & Mu Zhang, 2020. "Influence of Cultural Identity on Tourists’ Authenticity Perception, Tourist Satisfaction, and Traveler Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Chen, Ching-Fu & Chen, Fu-Shian, 2010. "Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 29-35.
    4. Zhou, Qilou (Bill) & Zhang, Jie & Zhang, Honglei & Ma, Jinhai, 2015. "A structural model of host authenticity," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 28-45.
    5. de Andrade-Matos, Mariana Bueno & Richards, Greg & de Lourdes de Azevedo Barbosa, Maria, 2022. "Rethinking authenticity through complexity paradigm," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Yi-De Liu, 2014. "Cultural Events and Cultural Tourism Development: Lessons from the European Capitals of Culture," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 498-514, March.
    7. Rickly, Jillian M., 2022. "A review of authenticity research in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on authenticity," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongjun Su & Junjie Xu & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2021. "Authenticity, Perceived Value and Loyalty in Marine Tourism Destinations: The Case of Zhoushan, Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Rickly, Jillian M., 2022. "A review of authenticity research in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on authenticity," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Wenwen Lu & Yongjun Su & Sitan Su & Jie Zhao & Li Zhang, 2022. "Perceived Authenticity and Experience Quality in Intangible Cultural Heritage Tourism: The Case of Kunqu Opera in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Brooks, Caitlin & Soulard, Joelle, 2022. "Contested authentication: The impact of event cancellation on transformative experiences, existential authenticity at burning man," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Cai, Xiang & Adjei, Mavis & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Obuobi, Bright, 2022. "Citizens’ intention to invest in municipal solid waste to energy projects in Ghana: The impact of direct and indirect effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    6. Heesup Han & Myong Jae Lee & Wansoo Kim, 2018. "Antecedents of Green Loyalty in the Cruise Industry: Sustainable Development and Environmental Management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 323-335, March.
    7. Dounia Sedra & Hicham El Bayed, 2022. "Branding the city: the case of Casablanca-Morocco," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 181-189, June.
    8. Yuhan Ge & Qing Yuan & Yaxi Wang & Keunsoo Park, 2021. "The Structural Relationship among Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction-Focused on Starbucks Reserve Coffee Shops in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Zhang Juan, 2020. "Diversification of Factors Influencing Qualitative Evaluation of a Historical and Cultural Destination," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 27(1), pages 33-39, March.
    10. Bart Neuts & João Romão & Eveline van Leeuwen & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "Describing the Relationships between Tourist Satisfaction and Destination Loyalty in a Segmented and Digitalized Market," Tourism Economics, , vol. 19(5), pages 987-1004, October.
    11. Gao, Yanan & Rasouli, Soora & Timmermans, Harry & Wang, Yuanqing, 2018. "Trip stage satisfaction of public transport users: A reference-based model incorporating trip attributes, perceived service quality, psychological disposition and difference tolerance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 759-775.
    12. Pipatpong Fakfare & Walanchalee Wattanacharoensil, 2023. "Low‐carbon tourism for island destinations: A crucial alternative for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 180-197, February.
    13. Daniel Martínez-Cevallos & Alejandra Proaño-Grijalva & Mario Alguacil & Daniel Duclos-Bastías & David Parra-Camacho, 2020. "Segmentation of Participants in a Sports Event Using Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Ilisa Fajriyati & Adi Zakaria Afiff & Gita Gayatri & Sri Rahayu Hijrah Hati, 2022. "Attributes Influencing Overall Tourist Satisfaction and Its Consequences for Muslim-Majority Destination," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    15. Hyeon Mo Jeon & Se Ran Yoo & Seon Hee Kim, 2020. "The Relationships among Experience, Delight, and Recollection for Revisit Intention in Chocolate Exposition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Dong, Ping & Siu, Noel Yee-Man, 2013. "Servicescape elements, customer predispositions and service experience: The case of theme park visitors," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 541-551.
    17. Wenkun Zhang & Yanan Wang & Tao Zhang, 2021. "Can “Live Streaming†Really Drive Visitors to the Destination? From the Aspect of “Social Presenceâ€," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    18. Parmita Saha & Atanu Nath, 2017. "A Conceptual Framework of Festival Visitors’ Behavioral Intentions," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    19. Chatzigeorgiou, Chryssoula & Christou, Evangelos & Simeli, Ioanna, 2017. "Delegate satisfaction from conference service quality and its impact on future behavioural intentions," MPRA Paper 93933, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Rizaldi Yusfiarto & Septy Setia Nugraha & Galuh Tri Pambekti & Annes Nisrina Khoirunnisa, 2023. "Building loyalty in Islamic banking relationship: a multiple mediation approach empirically in Indonesia," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 306-320, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2510-:d:755425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.