IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2073-d747303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing Online Product Reviews and Muslim Fashion Innovation for Resilience during the New Normal in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Yunia Dwie Nurcahyanie

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana, Surabaya 60234, Indonesia)

  • Moses Laksono Singgih

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)

  • Dyah Santhi Dewi

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia has harmed the fashion sector, particularly SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises). In the wake of the epidemic, the Muslim Fashion Shop (MFS) sector has experienced a drop in sales. Therefore, developing innovative products and excellent customer approaches are critical to MFS resilience. This pandemic has additionally affected the shift from offline to online sales channels. Online sales features, referred to as online product reviews (OPRs), allow customers to leave comments or evaluations. OPRs are one of the sources of product feature information, and are a means of increasing valued for online consumers that some companies are currently underutilizing. In order to develop Muslim fashion designs, this project performed OPRs. The purpose of this study is to show the benefits of OPRs in the development of new Muslim fashion products in Indonesia in order to assist businesses in surviving in the new normal era. The first phase of OPR data collection at Shopee was carried out in five steps. OPR data were collected in Shopee using NVivo’s N-Capture QSR. The data obtained from phase one were needed in order to equalize perceptions and make corrections using the member check obtained data OPR method using Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The second phase consisted of eight steps. This phase sharpened the results of phase one using expert judgement word frequency analysis in NIVO. The third and final phase analysed the fashion industry’s new normal innovation approach. This research shows the usefulness of OPR data for the evolution of fashion design in Indonesia, among other findings. According to this study, companies’ expertise, experience, and design innovation are essential variables in a changing/disruptive marketplace. Ongoing research suggests utilizing OPRs to generate new design trends, high-quality products, and innovative tactics in order to sustain Muslim fashion business.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunia Dwie Nurcahyanie & Moses Laksono Singgih & Dyah Santhi Dewi, 2022. "Implementing Online Product Reviews and Muslim Fashion Innovation for Resilience during the New Normal in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2073-:d:747303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2073/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2073/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gyorgy Gonda & Eva Gorgenyi-Hegyes & Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Maria Fekete-Farkas, 2020. "Competitive Factors of Fashion Retail Sector with Special Focus on SMEs," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Acharya, Abhilash & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Pereira, Vijay & Singh, Poonam, 2018. "Big data, knowledge co-creation and decision making in fashion industry," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 90-101.
    3. Konstantin Neumann & Tim van Erp & Erik Steinhöfel & Felix Sieckmann & Holger Kohl, 2021. "Patterns for Resilient Value Creation: Perspective of the German Electrical Industry during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Aiyun Xiao & Shaohua Yang & Qaisar Iqbal, 2018. "Factors Affecting Purchase Intentions in Generation Y: An Empirical Evidence from Fast Food Industry in Malaysia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Graeme D. Smith & Fowie Ng & Roger Watson, 2020. "“Masking the evidence”: Perspectives of the COVID‐19 pandemic," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3580-3583, October.
    6. Chowdhury, Md. Maruf Hossan & Quaddus, Mohammed A., 2016. "A multi-phased QFD based optimization approach to sustainable service design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 165-178.
    7. Miriam Jankalová & Radoslav Jankal, 2020. "How to Characterize Business Excellence and Determine the Relation between Business Excellence and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Andriani Kusumawati & Sari Listyorini & Suharyono & Edy Yulianto, 2020. "The Role of Religiosity on Fashion Store Patronage Intention of Muslim Consumers in Indonesia," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    9. Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1261-1270.
    10. Muhartini Salim & Ronal Aprianto & Syaiful Anwar Abu Bakar & Muhammad Rusdi, 2022. "Muslim Clothing Online Purchases in Indonesia during COVID-19 Crisis," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Erminia D’Itria & Chiara Colombi, 2022. "Biobased Innovation as a Fashion and Textile Design Must: A European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Anil Balikci & Yuri Borgianni & Lorenzo Maccioni & Chiara Nezzi, 2021. "A Framework of Unsustainable Behaviors to Support Product Eco-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Michal Varmus & Milan Kubina & Pavol Boško & Martin Mičiak, 2022. "Application of the Perceived Popularity of Sports to Support the Sustainable Management of Sports Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
    3. de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Barberio Mariano, Enzo & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes, 2018. "Management theory and big data literature: From a review to a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 112-129.
    4. Book, Laura A. & Tanford, Sarah & Chang, Wen, 2018. "Customer reviews are not always informative: The impact of effortful versus heuristic processing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 272-280.
    5. Bag, Sujoy & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar & Chan, Felix T.S., 2019. "Predicting the consumer's purchase intention of durable goods: An attribute-level analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 408-419.
    6. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Ahmed, Syed Ishtiaque & Smolander, Kari, 2022. "What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Mohamed Saeudy & Ali Meftah Gerged & Khaldoon Albitar, 2022. "Accounting Perspectives on The Business Value of Big Data During and Beyond The COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 174-199, June.
    8. Azer, Jaylan & Anker, Thomas & Taheri, Babak & Tinsley, Ross, 2023. "Consumer-Driven racial stigmatization: The moderating role of race in online consumer-to-consumer reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Behl, Abhishek & Gaur, Jighyasu & Pereira, Vijay & Yadav, Rambalak & Laker, Benjamin, 2022. "Role of big data analytics capabilities to improve sustainable competitive advantage of MSME service firms during COVID-19 – A multi-theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 378-389.
    10. Li, Lei & Lin, Jiabao & Ouyang, Ye & Luo, Xin (Robert), 2022. "Evaluating the impact of big data analytics usage on the decision-making quality of organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Bhukya, Ramulu & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Social influence research in consumer behavior: What we learned and what we need to learn? – A hybrid systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    12. Chen, Yi & Ding, Shuai & Zheng, Handong & Zhang, Youtao & Yang, Shanlin, 2018. "Exploring diffusion strategies for mHealth promotion using evolutionary game model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 336(C), pages 148-161.
    13. Moradi, Masoud & Dass, Mayukh & Kumar, Piyush, 2023. "Differential effects of analytical versus emotional rhetorical style on review helpfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. Judit Oláh & Yusmar Ardhi Hidayat & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Morshadul Hasan & József Popp, 2021. "Inter-Organizational Trust on Financial Performance: Proposing Innovation as a Mediating Variable to Sustain in a Disruptive Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Rizaldi Yusfiarto & Septy Setia Nugraha & Galuh Tri Pambekti & Annes Nisrina Khoirunnisa, 2023. "Building loyalty in Islamic banking relationship: a multiple mediation approach empirically in Indonesia," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 306-320, June.
    16. Yani Wang & Jun Wang & Tang Yao, 2019. "What makes a helpful online review? A meta-analysis of review characteristics," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 257-284, June.
    17. Viglia, Giampaolo & Abrate, Graziano, 2017. "When distinction does not pay off - Investigating the determinants of European agritourism prices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 45-52.
    18. Guha Majumder, Madhumita & Dutta Gupta, Sangita & Paul, Justin, 2022. "Perceived usefulness of online customer reviews: A review mining approach using machine learning & exploratory data analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 147-164.
    19. Zhuang, Mengzhou & Cui, Geng & Peng, Ling, 2018. "Manufactured opinions: The effect of manipulating online product reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 24-35.
    20. Shahzad, Khuram & Zhang, Qingyu & Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Rehman, Shafique Ur, 2023. "The role of blockchain-enabled traceability, task technology fit, and user self-efficacy in mobile food delivery applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2073-:d:747303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.