IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2013-d746292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Different Envelope Configurations via Optimization Analysis and Thermal Performance Indicators: A Case Study in a Tropical Climate

Author

Listed:
  • Jesús Araúz

    (Research Group Energy and Comfort in Bioclimatic Buildings, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá, Ciudad de Panama 0819-07289, Panama
    Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid C/José Gutíerrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Dafni Mora

    (Research Group Energy and Comfort in Bioclimatic Buildings, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá, Ciudad de Panama 0819-07289, Panama
    Centro de Estudios Multidisciplinarios en Ciencias, Ingeniería y Tecnología (CEMCIT-AIP), Panama City 0819-07289, Panama
    Current address: Avenida Domingo Díaz, Panama City 0819-07289, Panama.)

  • Miguel Chen Austin

    (Research Group Energy and Comfort in Bioclimatic Buildings, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá, Ciudad de Panama 0819-07289, Panama
    Centro de Estudios Multidisciplinarios en Ciencias, Ingeniería y Tecnología (CEMCIT-AIP), Panama City 0819-07289, Panama
    Groupe Recherche Environnement, Confort, Conception Architecturale et Urbaine (GRECCAU), EA 7482, ENSAP Bordeaux, F-33400 Talence, France
    Current address: Avenida Domingo Díaz, Panama City 0819-07289, Panama.)

Abstract

Passive solutions for more energy-efficient buildings are critical to improving our odds in the current energy crisis. This work focuses on assessing the thermal performance of different envelope construction layouts in a tropical climate through proposed indicators regarding the thermal mass degree (TMD) and insulation degree (ID). For this, a numerical study was performed for a reference building (RB) in Panama City and validated with the electricity consumption bills. Behavioral and sensitivity analyses were employed to identify critical heat gains and the most important envelope constructions, resulting in the layouts of the roof and external walls. Optimization analyses were performed to find adequate layouts to reduce the discomfort hours. Different roofs, external walls, internal partition layouts, and glazing types were evaluated. Results indicated that the adequate envelope configuration is a roof layout with low TMD and ID, along with wall layouts with high TMD and low ID.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesús Araúz & Dafni Mora & Miguel Chen Austin, 2022. "Assessment of Different Envelope Configurations via Optimization Analysis and Thermal Performance Indicators: A Case Study in a Tropical Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2013-:d:746292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avendaño-Vera, Constanza & Martinez-Soto, Aner & Marincioni, Valentina, 2020. "Determination of optimal thermal inertia of building materials for housing in different Chilean climate zones," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Nusrat Jannat & Aseel Hussien & Badr Abdullah & Alison Cotgrave, 2020. "A Comparative Simulation Study of the Thermal Performances of the Building Envelope Wall Materials in the Tropics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Saikia, Pranaynil & Pancholi, Marmik & Sood, Divyanshu & Rakshit, Dibakar, 2020. "Dynamic optimization of multi-retrofit building envelope for enhanced energy performance with a case study in hot Indian climate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    4. Fabiana Silvero & Fernanda Rodrigues & Sergio Montelpare, 2019. "A Parametric Study and Performance Evaluation of Energy Retrofit Solutions for Buildings Located in the Hot-Humid Climate of Paraguay—Sensitivity Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Germán Ramos Ruiz & Carlos Fernández Bandera, 2017. "Validation of Calibrated Energy Models: Common Errors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Steve Carver & Naja Mikkelsen & John Woodward, 2002. "Long‐term rates of mass wasting in Mesters Vig, northeast Greenland: notes on a re‐survey," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 243-249, July.
    7. Teng Shao & Wuxing Zheng & Hong Jin, 2020. "Analysis of the Indoor Thermal Environment and Passive Energy-Saving Optimization Design of Rural Dwellings in Zhalantun, Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-34, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chun-Hsi Vivian Chen & Yu-Cheng Chen, 2021. "Assessment of Enhancing Employee Engagement in Energy-Saving Behavior at Workplace: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Žižak, Tej & Domjan, Suzana & Medved, Sašo & Arkar, Ciril, 2022. "Efficiency and sustainability assessment of evaporative cooling of photovoltaics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    3. Martín Pensado-Mariño & Lara Febrero-Garrido & Pablo Eguía-Oller & Enrique Granada-Álvarez, 2021. "Feasibility of Different Weather Data Sources Applied to Building Indoor Temperature Estimation Using LSTM Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Abdelhakim Mesloub & Aritra Ghosh & Mabrouk Touahmia & Ghazy Abdullah Albaqawy & Emad Noaime & Badr M. Alsolami, 2020. "Performance Analysis of Photovoltaic Integrated Shading Devices (PVSDs) and Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic (STPV) Devices Retrofitted to a Prototype Office Building in a Hot Desert Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Kittisak Lohwanitchai & Daranee Jareemit, 2021. "Modeling Energy Efficiency Performance and Cost-Benefit Analysis Achieving Net-Zero Energy Building Design: Case Studies of Three Representative Offices in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Gigih Rahmandhani Setyantho & Hansaem Park & Seongju Chang, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Performance Assessment for Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic Windows in Different Climate Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Tomasz Szul & Krzysztof Nęcka & Stanisław Lis, 2021. "Application of the Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Modeling to Forecast Energy Efficiency in Real Buildings Undergoing Thermal Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Suzana Domjan & Sašo Medved & Boštjan Černe & Ciril Arkar, 2019. "Fast Modelling of nZEB Metrics of Office Buildings Built with Advanced Glass and BIPV Facade Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Ana Ogando-Martínez & Javier López-Gómez & Lara Febrero-Garrido, 2018. "Maintenance Factor Identification in Outdoor Lighting Installations Using Simulation and Optimization Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Shamsi, Mohammad Haris & Ali, Usman & Mangina, Eleni & O’Donnell, James, 2021. "Feature assessment frameworks to evaluate reduced-order grey-box building energy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    11. Joanna Piotrowska-Woroniak & Tomasz Szul, 2022. "Application of a Model Based on Rough Set Theory (RST) to Estimate the Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Suzana Domjan & Lenart Petek & Ciril Arkar & Sašo Medved, 2020. "Experimental Study on Energy Efficiency of Multi-Functional BIPV Glazed Façade Structure during Heating Season," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Qu, Ke & Chen, Xiangjie & Wang, Yixin & Calautit, John & Riffat, Saffa & Cui, Xin, 2021. "Comprehensive energy, economic and thermal comfort assessments for the passive energy retrofit of historical buildings - A case study of a late nineteenth-century Victorian house renovation in the UK," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    14. Sanjin Gumbarević & Ivana Burcar Dunović & Bojan Milovanović & Mergim Gaši, 2020. "Method for Building Information Modeling Supported Project Control of Nearly Zero-Energy Building Delivery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    15. David Bienvenido-Huertas, 2020. "Analysis of the Impact of the Use Profile of HVAC Systems Established by the Spanish Standard to Assess Residential Building Energy Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Pasichnyi, Oleksii & Wallin, Jörgen & Kordas, Olga, 2019. "Data-driven building archetypes for urban building energy modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 360-377.
    17. Krzysztof Nęcka & Tomasz Szul, 2023. "Selection of a Multicriteria Method for Selecting Independent Variables for Forecasting the Energy Potential of Municipal Waste—A Case Study in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Hossein Bakhtiari & Jan Akander & Mathias Cehlin & Abolfazl Hayati, 2020. "On the Performance of Night Ventilation in a Historic Office Building in Nordic Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Hughes, Caroline & Natarajan, Sukumar & Liu, Chunde & Chung, Woong June & Herrera, Manuel, 2019. "Winter thermal comfort and health in the elderly," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Hanan S.S. Ibrahim & Ahmed Z. Khan & Waqas Ahmed Mahar & Shady Attia & Yehya Serag, 2021. "Assessment of Passive Retrofitting Scenarios in Heritage Residential Buildings in Hot, Dry Climates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-27, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2013-:d:746292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.