IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16231-d994121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Oligopoly Sequential Pricing Mechanisms and Their Game Analysis in Raw Material Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Huilin Yao

    (School of Business, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Rizhao Gong

    (School of Business, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zhihui Yuan

    (School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China)

Abstract

The sequential pricing game model is an approach that can be effectively used to solve the problem with multi-oligopoly pricing mechanisms in raw material supply chains. However, the existing sequential pricing mechanism does not fully consider constraints such as the purchase volume of downstream firms and the change information of each parameter, which leads to the pricing mechanism being detached from the real market. According to the concept of the sequential pricing game model being used among multi-oligopolies under constraints, we constructed the constrained sequential pricing game model by incorporating the parameters related to the product demand function, marginal production cost, dominant coefficient, following coefficient, and agreed minimum purchase volume as constraints, and the model was converted into a nonlinear bilevel programming model to facilitate model solving. Furthermore, we provided the analytical solution formulas for six special cases, thus making the model more similar to the real market. In addition, the effects of the agreed minimum purchase volume and the dominant and following coefficients on the equilibrium quoted prices and profits of the firms were analyzed. The results of the numerical simulation show that the constrained sequential pricing game model is more effective than the unconstrained sequential pricing game model in solving the problem with the multi-oligopoly pricing mechanism, which means that it can be used to establish a better pricing mechanism and provide a more reasonable and scientific basis for market operation and policymakers in solving practical problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Huilin Yao & Rizhao Gong & Zhihui Yuan, 2022. "Multi-Oligopoly Sequential Pricing Mechanisms and Their Game Analysis in Raw Material Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16231-:d:994121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16231/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16231/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xue Peng & Fulin Wang & Jiquan Wang & Chang Qian, 2022. "Research on Food Safety Control Based on Evolutionary Game Method from the Perspective of the Food Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Baojun Jiang & Bicheng Yang, 2019. "Quality and Pricing Decisions in a Market with Consumer Information Sharing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 272-285, January.
    3. Niu, Baozhuang & Dong, Jian & Liu, Yaoqi, 2021. "Incentive alignment for blockchain adoption in medicine supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Mirco Peron & Giuseppe Fragapane & Fabio Sgarbossa & Michael Kay, 2020. "Digital Facility Layout Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Yang Bai & He Yang & Yu Zhao & Min Zhang & Jinyuan Qin & Feng Mi, 2020. "Optimizing the Raw Material Supply Chain of the Wood Biomass Power Generation Industry for Different Stakeholders’ Benefits: An Analysis of Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Cheng Che & Xin Geng & Huixian Zheng & Yi Chen & Xiaoguang Zhang, 2022. "The Pricing Mechanism Analysis of China’s Natural Gas Supply Chain under the “Dual Carbon” Target Based on the Perspective of Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Zongsheng Huang, 2020. "Stochastic Differential Game in the Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Niu, Baozhuang & Mu, Zihao & Cao, Bin & Gao, Jie, 2021. "Should multinational firms implement blockchain to provide quality verification?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Gurnani, Haresh & Gerchak, Yigal, 2007. "Coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1559-1576, February.
    10. Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Mahsa Noori-daryan, 2016. "Pricing, manufacturing and inventory policies for raw material in a three-level supply chain," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 919-931, March.
    11. Li, Wei & Chen, Jing, 2018. "Pricing and quality competition in a brand-differentiated supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 97-108.
    12. Shen, Bin & Xu, Xiaoyan & Yuan, Quan, 2020. "Selling secondhand products through an online platform with blockchain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    13. Manojit Das & Dipak Kumar Jana & Shariful Alam, 2022. "Game theoretic analysis of a three-stage interconnected forward and reverse supply chain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7976-8007, June.
    14. Gan Wan & Gang Kou & Tie Li & Feng Xiao & Yang Chen, 2020. "Pricing Policies in a Retailer Stackelberg O2O Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Yu & Yi, Chaoqun & Wan, Guangyu & Hu, Hanli & Li, Qingsong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "An analysis on the role of blockchain-based platforms in agricultural supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Niu, Baozhuang & Xu, Haotao & Chen, Lei, 2022. "Creating all-win by blockchain in a remanufacturing supply chain with consumer risk-aversion and quality untrust," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Li, Qingying & Ma, Manqiong & Shi, Tianqin & Zhu, Chen, 2022. "Green investment in a sustainable supply chain: The role of blockchain and fairness," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Cao, Yifan & Shen, Bin, 2022. "Adopting blockchain technology to block less sustainable products’ entry in global trade," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Biswas, Debajyoti & Jalali, Hamed & Ansaripoor, Amir H. & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2023. "Traceability vs. sustainability in supply chains: The implications of blockchain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 128-147.
    6. Liu, Shuai & Hua, Guowei & Kang, Yuxuan & Edwin Cheng, T.C. & Xu, Yadong, 2022. "What value does blockchain bring to the imported fresh food supply chain?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Zhou, Yu & Gao, Xiang & Luo, Suyuan & Xiong, Yu & Ye, Niangyue, 2022. "Anti-Counterfeiting in a retail Platform: A Game-Theoretic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Xiaole Dou & Zenglu Li & Chun Liu, 2022. "Secondhand product quality disclosure strategy of the retailer under different supply chain structures," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2982-2999, October.
    9. Zhang, Tianyu & Dong, Peiwu & Chen, Xiangfeng & Gong, Yu, 2023. "The impacts of blockchain adoption on a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse members," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Dong, Shuang & Qin, Zhongfeng & Yan, Yingchen, 2022. "Effects of online-to-offline spillovers on pricing and quality strategies of competing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    11. Sarker, Indranil & Datta, Bidisha, 2022. "Re-designing the pension business processes for achieving technology-driven reforms through blockchain adoption: A proposed architecture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Li, Zhiwen & Xu, Xianhao & Bai, Qingguo & Guan, Xu & Zeng, Kuan, 2021. "The interplay between blockchain adoption and channel selection in combating counterfeits," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Liu, Samuel Shuai & Hua, Guowei & Ma, Benedict Jun & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Competition between green and non-green products in the blockchain era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    14. Sun, Mingyao & Chai, Qiangfei & Ng, Chi To, 2023. "Managing the quality-speed tradeoff in blockchain-supported healthcare diagnostic services," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Zhang, Tao & Tang, Zhongjun, 2023. "Should manufacturers open live streaming shopping channels?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Zhang, Qing & Jiang, Xiuqi & Zheng, Yini, 2023. "Blockchain adoption and gray markets in a global supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    17. Xiaogang Ma & Chunyu Bao & Jizi Li & Wandong Lou, 2022. "The impact of dual fairness concerns on bargaining game and its dynamic system stability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 357-382, November.
    18. Xu, Xiaoping & Yan, Luling & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "When Is It Wise to Use Blockchain for Platform Operations with Remanufacturing?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1073-1090.
    19. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    20. Yan, Xiaoming & Zhang, Minghui & Liu, Ke, 2010. "A note on coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 469-478, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16231-:d:994121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.