IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15523-d980472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Agriculture: Relationship between Knowledge and Attitude among University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Durán Gabela

    (Department of Agricultural Education & Communications, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

  • Bernardo Trejos

    (Department of Environmental Science and Development, Panamerican Agricultural School, Zamorano University, Tegucigalpa 11101, Honduras)

  • Pablo Lamiño Jaramillo

    (Department of Agricultural Education & Communications, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

  • Amy Boren-Alpízar

    (Department of Agricultural Education & Communications, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture (SA) has emerged as an alternative to feeding an increasing global population. Several frameworks have been used in SA research. This study proposes understanding SA under five components: environment, economy, society, resilience, and persistence. The decision-making process for adopting SA is determined by several factors, such as knowledge and attitudes. Both constructs play a decisive role in SA’s development, a field where university students are called to be leaders and decision-makers. Despite the increase in the body of SA literature, little is known about SA in Latin America. This research aimed to analyze university students’ attitudes and knowledge of SA and the relationship between both constructs. A completely structured questionnaire was designed and distributed online. A Likert-type scale was used for attitude and multiple-choice questions for knowledge. It was found that, among participants ( n = 374), the majority had a high level of attitude (71.9%) and a moderate level of knowledge (62.1%) of SA. Participants’ attitudes towards SA were positive, regardless of gender ( p = 0.17) and perceived knowledge does not predict measured knowledge ( R 2 = 0.074; p < 0.001). Moreover, a low positive relationship was found between attitude and knowledge ( r s = 0.252; p = 0.000). Further research should focus on analyzing other factors that could affect attitude and knowledge of SA.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Durán Gabela & Bernardo Trejos & Pablo Lamiño Jaramillo & Amy Boren-Alpízar, 2022. "Sustainable Agriculture: Relationship between Knowledge and Attitude among University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15523-:d:980472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15523/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15523/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lynn V. Dicks & Richard D. Bardgett & Jenny Bell & Tim G. Benton & Angela Booth & Jan Bouwman & Chris Brown & Ann Bruce & Paul J. Burgess & Simon J. Butler & Ian Crute & Frances Dixon & Caroline Drumm, 2013. "What Do We Need to Know to Enhance the Environmental Sustainability of Agricultural Production? A Prioritisation of Knowledge Needs for the UK Food System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(7), pages 1-21, July.
    2. K. Rezaei-Moghaddam & E. Karami, 2008. "A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 407-426, August.
    3. Sydorovych, Olha & Wossink, Ada, 2008. "The meaning of agricultural sustainability: Evidence from a conjoint choice survey," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 10-20, July.
    4. Xiaodong Yang & Lai Wei & Qi Su, 2020. "How Is Climate Change Knowledge Distributed among the Population in Singapore? A Demographic Analysis of Actual Knowledge and Illusory Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Sarkar, Apurbo & Azim, Jony Abdul & Asif, Abdullah Al & Qian, Lu & Peau, Anamika Kor, 2021. "Structural equation modeling for indicators of sustainable agriculture: Prospective of a developing country’s agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Wu, Wenbin & Yu, Qiangyi & You, Liangzhi & Chen, Kevin & Tang, Huajun & Liu, Jianguo, 2018. "Global cropping intensity gaps: Increasing food production without cropland expansion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 515-525.
    7. DeLonge, Marcia S. & Miles, Albie & Carlisle, Liz, 2016. "Investing in the transition to sustainable agriculture," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P1), pages 266-273.
    8. Ezatollah Karami & Afsaneh Mansoorabadi, 2008. "Sustainable agricultural attitudes and behaviors: a gender analysis of Iranian farmers," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(6), pages 883-898, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Rafik N. Qureshi & Ram Karan Singh & Mohd. Abul Hasan, 2018. "Decision support model to select crop pattern for sustainable agricultural practices using fuzzy MCDM," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 641-659, April.
    2. Soltani, Arezoo & Angelsen, Arild & Eid, Tron & Naieni, Mohammad Saeid Noori & Shamekhi, Taghi, 2012. "Poverty, sustainability, and household livelihood strategies in Zagros, Iran," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 60-70.
    3. Ahtiainen, Heini & Pouta, Eija & Liski, Eero & Assmuth, Aino & Myyrä, Sami, 2014. "The importance of agricultural objectives – summary of studies," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182792, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Zhongen Niu & Huimin Yan & Fang Liu, 2020. "Decreasing Cropping Intensity Dominated the Negative Trend of Cropland Productivity in Southern China in 2000–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Shah Fahad & Sangram Bhanudas Chavan & Akash Ravindra Chichaghare & Appanderanda Ramani Uthappa & Manish Kumar & Vijaysinha Kakade & Aliza Pradhan & Dinesh Jinger & Gauri Rawale & Dinesh Kumar Yadav &, 2022. "Agroforestry Systems for Soil Health Improvement and Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Gołębiewska, Barbara & Grontkowska, Anna & Gębska, Monika, 2020. "Education as the Differentiating Factor in Applying Sustainable Development Principles on Farms," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(3).
    7. Merad, Myriam & Dechy, Nicolas & Serir, Lisa & Grabisch, Michel & Marcel, Frédéric, 2013. "Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an organization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 603-613.
    8. Alison Shaw & Patti Kristjanson, 2014. "A Catalyst toward Sustainability? Exploring Social Learning and Social Differentiation Approaches with the Agricultural Poor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-33, May.
    9. Stefan Bojnec & Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag & Carmen Valentina Radulescu, 2019. "Locally Produced Organic Food: Consumer Preferences," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 209-209, February.
    10. Mingting Shi & Shenao Ma & Sheng Zhong, 2025. "Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics and Obstacle Factor Analysis of Rural Modernization Development Level in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Hubeau, Marianne & Marchand, Fleur & Coteur, Ine & Mondelaers, Koen & Debruyne, Lies & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2017. "A new agri-food systems sustainability approach to identify shared transformation pathways towards sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 52-63.
    12. Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho, 2020. "Exploring the Topics of Soil Pollution and Agricultural Economics: Highlighting Good Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Riska Ayu Purnamasari & Tofael Ahamed & Ryozo Noguchi, 2019. "Land suitability assessment for cassava production in Indonesia using GIS, remote sensing and multi-criteria analysis," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-32, February.
    14. Karla Rubio‐Jovel & Jorge Sellare & Yannic Damm & Thomas Dietz, 2024. "SDGs trade‐offs associated with voluntary sustainability standards: A case study from the coffee sector in Costa Rica," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 917-939, February.
    15. Garyfallos Arabatzis & Georgios Kolkos & Anastasia Stergiadou & Apostolos Kantartzis & Stergios Tampekis, 2024. "Optimal Allocation of Water Reservoirs for Sustainable Wildfire Prevention Planning via AHP-TOPSIS and Forest Road Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-27, January.
    16. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2024. "Culturally Informed Technology: Assessing Its Importance in the Transition to Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Thanh Ngo & Hai‐Dang Nguyen & Huong Ho & Vo‐Kien Nguyen & Thuy T. T. Dao & Hai T. H. Nguyen, 2021. "Assessing the important factors of sustainable agriculture development: An Indicateurs de Durabilité des Exploitations Agricoles‐Analytic Hierarchy Process study in the northern region of Vietnam," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 327-338, March.
    18. Chen Huang & Jinlong Zhao & Zhongchen Yang & Liang Wang, 2025. "The Impact Mechanisms of New Quality Productive Forces on Rural Transformation: Evidence from Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Lulin Shen & Fang Wang, 2024. "Can Market-Oriented Allocation of Land Factors Promote the Adoption of Cropland Quality Protection Behaviors by Farmers: Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Shen, Ge & Yu, Qiangyi & Zhou, Qingbo & Wang, Cong & Wu, Wenbin, 2023. "From multiple cropping frequency to multiple cropping system: A new perspective for the characterization of cropland use intensity," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15523-:d:980472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.