IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15205-d974495.html

Is Silence Golden? The Influence of Employee Silence on the Transactional Leadership and Job Satisfaction Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Yousef Ahmad Alarabiat

    (Business Administration Department, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Near East University, Cyprus/Mersin 10, Nicosia 99010, Turkey)

  • Serife Eyupoglu

    (Business Administration Department, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Near East University, Cyprus/Mersin 10, Nicosia 99010, Turkey)

Abstract

The literature has shown that a positive relationship between transactional leadership and job satisfaction in private and public organizations exist. This relationship is critical for sustained organizational performance; however, this relationship can be challenged by the existence of employee silence in the organizational setting. Based on self-determination theory, this study measured the impact of transactional leadership on job satisfaction as well as the part of employee silence in the leadership–satisfaction relationship in a public organizational setting. The study sample consisted of employees working at the Ministry of Justice in Jordon, and 450 questionnaires were applied with 357 useable questionnaires being returned. The data were tested through confirmatory factor analysis, correlation and regression analyses, and structural equation modeling. The results showed a strong positive relationship between transactional leadership and job satisfaction, though employee silence as a mediator indicated reduced job satisfaction. The importance of public organization leaders being more mindful towards the employee silence phenomenon and how it can be detrimental in the transactional leadership–job satisfaction relationship was highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Yousef Ahmad Alarabiat & Serife Eyupoglu, 2022. "Is Silence Golden? The Influence of Employee Silence on the Transactional Leadership and Job Satisfaction Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15205-:d:974495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15205/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15205/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MacKenzie, Scott B. & Podsakoff, Philip M., 2012. "Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 542-555.
    2. Tian-Syung Lan & I-Hsiung Chang & Tsz-Ching Ma & Lie-Ping Zhang & Kai-Chi Chuang, 2019. "Influences of Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, and Patriarchal Leadership on Job Satisfaction of Cram School Faculty Members," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Ali Bousbia Brahim & Ognjen Ridic & Tomislav Jukic, 2015. "The Effect Of Transactional Leadership On Employees Performance - Case Study Of 5 Algerian Banking Institutions," Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, University of Tuzla, Faculty of Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 7-20, November.
    4. Maria Lucia Specchia & Maria Rosaria Cozzolino & Elettra Carini & Andrea Di Pilla & Caterina Galletti & Walter Ricciardi & Gianfranco Damiani, 2021. "Leadership Styles and Nurses’ Job Satisfaction. Results of a Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Saleh Althnayan & Areej Alarifi & Saleh Bajaba & Abdullah Alsabban, 2022. "Linking Environmental Transformational Leadership, Environmental Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Sustainability Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Abdulkhamid Komil ugli Fayzullaev & Odiljon Sobirovich Abdurazzakov & Dilshodjon Alidjonovich Rakhmonov & Oyniso Zakirova, 2022. "Paternalistic Leadership Styles and Employee Voice: The Roles of Trust in Supervisors and Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tara Kader & Serife Zihni Eyupoglu & Laith Tashtoush, 2025. "Unveiling the Impact of Servant Leadership on Employee Performance: The Role of Organizational Trust in Mobile Telecom Providers in Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chien-Fan Chen & Cherng G. Ding, 2026. "An improvement in the detection of common method biases," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 791-815, February.
    2. Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Escobar, Octavio & Lan, Sai, 2022. "Virtual reality tourism to satisfy wanderlust without wandering: An unconventional innovation to promote sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 128-143.
    3. Ramendra Pratap Singh & Neelotpaul Banerjee, 2018. "Exploring the Influence of Celebrity Credibility on Brand Attitude, Advertisement Attitude and Purchase Intention," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(6), pages 1622-1639, December.
    4. Muhamad Azrin Nazri & Nor Asiah Omar & Aini Aman & Abu Hanifah Ayob & Nur Ainna Ramli, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Performance in Takaful Agencies: The Moderating Role of Objective Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Samadhiya, Ashutosh & Yadav, Sanjeev & Kumar, Anil & Majumdar, Abhijit & Luthra, Sunil & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Upadhyay, Arvind, 2023. "The influence of artificial intelligence techniques on disruption management: Does supply chain dynamism matter?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco, 2021. "Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 673-687.
    7. Mohamed Albaity & Mahfuzur Rahman, 2021. "Customer Loyalty towards Islamic Banks: The Mediating Role of Trust and Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Heena Thanki & Sweety Shah & Harishchandra Singh Rathod & Ankit D. Oza & Dumitru Doru Burduhos-Nergis, 2022. "I Am Ready to Invest in Socially Responsible Investments (SRI) Options Only If the Returns Are Not Compromised: Individual Investors’ Intentions toward SRI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Adnan Riaz & Waseem Khan Shinwari & Naveed Ahmed Khan & Syed Ahsan Jamil & Asif Khurshid, 2026. "Level 5 leadership (L5L) scale development and validation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 2607-2629, February.
    10. Kent Marett & Shan Xiao & Sumin Kim, 2023. "Security compliance and work-issued mobile devices: Out of sight, out of mind?," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 913-945, December.
    11. Surajit Bag & Muhammad Sabbir Rahman & Gautam Srivastava & Peter Kilbourn & Nishikant Mishra, 2024. "Buyer–supplier partnerships and circular economy performance in food supply chains: Serial mediation by commitment contract and innovation performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1247-1264, February.
    12. Eduardo Terán-Yépez & David Jiménez-Castillo & Manuel Sánchez-Pérez, 2023. "The role of affect in international opportunity recognition and the formation of international opportunity beliefs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 941-983, April.
    13. Timothy Amoako & Hao Chen & Stephen Abiam Danso & Edem Segbefia, 2025. "The Role of Top Management Involvement and Supply Chain Integration on Smes’ Innovation Performance: Moderation Impact of Firm Experience Capability," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 5419-5452, March.
    14. Hung M. Nguyen & George Onofrei & Dothang Truong & Simon Lockrey, 2020. "Customer green orientation and process innovation alignment: A configuration approach in the global manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2498-2513, September.
    15. Alshehri, Abdullah, 2025. "When the recipe is more important than the ingredients, understanding factors affecting customer loyalty in unmanned convenience store using fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    17. Anwar Sadat Shimul & Isaac Cheah & Mahabubur Rahman, 2025. "Consumers’ dark personality traits drive gluckschmerz: the interplay of competitiveness and brand love," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 32(2), pages 112-130, March.
    18. Castaldo, Sandro & Ciacci, Andrea & Penco, Lara & Profumo, Giorgia, 2024. "Which trust layer better counterbalances the risk impact on travel intentions in a crisis scenario?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Christian Linder & Michael Nippa, 2019. "Jumping in at the deep end! The role of motivational forces in starting a new venture," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1363-1391, December.
    20. Khaksar, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh & Shahmehr, Fatemeh S. & Miah, Shah & Daim, Tugrul & Ozdemir, Dilek, 2024. "Privacy concerns versus personalisation benefits in social robot acceptance by employees: A paradox theory — Contingency perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15205-:d:974495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.