IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14988-d971261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Criteria for Choosing Subcontractors for Complex and Multi-Systems Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Shimon Fridkin

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Technology Management, HIT—Holon Institute of Technology, Holon 5810201, Israel)

  • Sigal Kordova

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel)

Abstract

Numerous companies from diverse industries use subcontracting in their operations. In complex projects, subcontractor selection is a crucial managerial decision that significantly impacts project success. The current mixed-methodology study examines that criteria that high-tech defense and civilian companies use to choose optimal subcontractors. The qualitative aspect derives from semi-structured interviews; the quantitative findings were obtained using three statistical methods: Friedman’s two-way analysis of variance by ranks, hierarchical cluster analysis, and multidimensional scaling (PROXSCAL). Data analysis yielded twelve leading criteria for subcontractor selection, categorized into four clusters of varying strength. The three highest-rated criteria were significantly stronger than the others and included system reliability and quality, level of service, and flexibility to change. The lowest rated criteria were leadership and innovation, and number of systems supplied in the past. The findings provide practical insights applicable to subcontractor selection and expand our knowledge of complex project management.

Suggested Citation

  • Shimon Fridkin & Sigal Kordova, 2022. "Examining Criteria for Choosing Subcontractors for Complex and Multi-Systems Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14988-:d:971261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14988/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14988/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert B. Handfield & Paul D. Cousins & Benn Lawson & Kenneth J. Petersen, 2015. "How Can Supply Management Really Improve Performance? A Knowledge-Based Model of Alignment Capabilities," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 51(3), pages 3-17, July.
    2. Anand Nair & Jayanth Jayaram & Ajay Das, 2015. "Strategic purchasing participation, supplier selection, supplier evaluation and purchasing performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(20), pages 6263-6278, October.
    3. Andersen, Poul Houman, 1999. "Organizing international technological collaboration in subcontractor relationships: an investigation of the knowledge-stickiness problem," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 625-642, August.
    4. Sarah A Sheard & Ali Mostashari, 2009. "Principles of complex systems for systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 295-311, December.
    5. Michael A. Lewis & Jens K. Roehrich, 2009. "Contracts, relationships and integration: towards a model of the procurement of complex performance," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 125-142.
    6. Dvir, D. & Lipovetsky, S. & Shenhar, A. & Tishler, A., 1998. "In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 915-935, December.
    7. Jasper Mbachu, 2008. "Conceptual framework for the assessment of subcontractors' eligibility and performance in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 471-484.
    8. Müller, Ralf & Turner, Rodney, 2007. "The Influence of Project Managers on Project Success Criteria and Project Success by Type of Project," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 298-309, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc Herz & Nicco Krezdorn, 2022. "Epic fail: Exploring project failure’s reasons, outcomes and indicators," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1169-1193, May.
    2. Majuri, Matti, 2022. "Inter-firm knowledge transfer in R&D project networks: A multiple case study," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Rodríguez-Segura, Enrique & Ortiz-Marcos, Isabel & Romero, José Javier & Tafur-Segura, Javier, 2016. "Critical success factors in large projects in the aerospace and defense sectors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5419-5425.
    4. Kumar Virender & Pandey Amrendra & Singh Rahul, 2023. "Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: project practitioners’ perspectives," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Muryum Jamil & Farooq Ahmad & Shahida Mariam, 2019. "Knowledge Sharing Accelerates Success of Complex Projects: An Evidence from Pakistan," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(2), pages 438-447, June.
    6. Santanu Mandal & Souvik Roy & G. Amar Raju, 2016. "Tourism supply chain agility: an empirical examination using resource-based view," International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 151-173.
    7. Maqbool, Rashid, 2018. "Efficiency and effectiveness of factors affecting renewable energy projects; an empirical perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 944-956.
    8. Morgan, Tyler R. & Roath, Anthony S. & Glenn Richey, Robert, 2023. "How risk, transparency, and knowledge influence the adaptability and flexibility dimensions of the responsiveness view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Silvia Martínez-Perales & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Jesús Juan Ruiz & Francisco Javier Lázaro, 2018. "Using Certification as a Tool to Develop Sustainability in Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Mahmoud Alreahi & Zoltán Bujdosó & Lóránt Dénes Dávid & Balázs Gyenge, 2023. "Green Supply Chain Management in Hotel Industry: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-32, March.
    11. Mahdieh Sabaghpour & Md. Nasiruzzaman & Md. Najibul Huq & Jamaludin Ibrahim, 2013. "Knowledge Management Strategies as a Competitive Advantage for Delivering Professional E-Government Services," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 4(5), pages 134-138.
    12. Achintya Ghatak & Adarsh Garg, 2022. "Power transmission project: a framework to align project success with organization goal," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 1817-1833, August.
    13. Ahmed S. El Touny & Ahmed H. Ibrahim & Hossam H. Mohamed, 2021. "An Integrated Sustainable Construction Project’s Critical Success Factors (ISCSFs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-26, August.
    14. Musa M. Mukhtar & Roslan Bin Amirudin & Trevor Sofield & Ismail Bin Mohamad, 2017. "Critical success factors for public housing projects in developing countries: a case study of Nigeria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 2039-2067, October.
    15. Emre S. Ozmen, 2013. "Project Management Methodology (PMM): How can PMM serve organisations today? [Méthodologie de gestion de projets (PMM): Comment peut servir PMM organisations aujourd'hui?]," Post-Print halshs-01200828, HAL.
    16. Chen, Nan & Qi, Di, 2024. "A physics-informed data-driven algorithm for ensemble forecast of complex turbulent systems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    17. Gabriel Jobidon & Pierre Lemieux & Robert Beauregard, 2019. "Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual Language," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-75, April.
    18. Avelina Alejo-Reyes & Erik Cuevas & Alma Rodríguez & Abraham Mendoza & Elias Olivares-Benitez, 2020. "An Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer for a Supplier Selection and Order Quantity Allocation Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Dawn Gilbert & Mike Yearworth, 2016. "Complexity in a Systems Engineering Organization: An Empirical Case Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 422-435, September.
    20. Muhammad Ikram & Qingyu Zhang & Robert Sroufe, 2020. "Developing integrated management systems using an AHP‐Fuzzy VIKOR approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2265-2283, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14988-:d:971261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.