IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v12y2009i4p295-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Principles of complex systems for systems engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah A Sheard
  • Ali Mostashari

Abstract

This paper shows how three systems of types well known to systems engineers can be understood as complex systems. This is important because research in complex systems sciences is vibrant and provides critical insight, but if systems engineers do not understand the complex aspects of the systems they work with daily, they may not be able to use these research results. To date, systems engineering has been looking only at exploiting the “order” side of the order‐to‐chaos spectrum, and it is time now to understand and begin to utilize principles from the middle and from the chaos side of the spectrum. Three complex systems examples are INCOSE, the systems engineering process (such as a company's standard process), and air traffic control. INCOSE represents most volunteer organizations and social groups. Most systems engineers do not realize that the systems engineering process for a company is a network that can be studied by complex systems methods. Air traffic control may come closest to many systems engineers' definition of a system. This paper provides principles of complex systems based on a variety of sources, and shows the application of complex systems to one of the examples. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah A Sheard & Ali Mostashari, 2009. "Principles of complex systems for systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 295-311, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:12:y:2009:i:4:p:295-311
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20124
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20124?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark W. Maier, 1998. "Architecting principles for systems‐of‐systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(4), pages 267-284.
    2. William B. Rouse, 2007. "Complex engineered, organizational and natural systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 260-271, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pedro Parraguez & Steven Eppinger & Anja Maier, 2016. "Characterizing Design Process Interfaces as Organization Networks: Insights for Engineering Systems Management," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 158-173, March.
    2. Michael W. Grenn & Shahram Sarkani & Thomas Mazzuchi, 2014. "The Requirements Entropy Framework in Systems Engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 462-478, December.
    3. Mary J. Simpson & Joseph J. Simpson, 2010. "Formal, theoretical aspects of systems engineering: Comments on “Principles of Complex Systems for Systems Engineering” [Syst Eng 12 (2009), 295–311]," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 204-207, June.
    4. Christos Ellinas & Neil Allan & Anders Johansson, 2016. "Exploring Structural Patterns Across Evolved and Designed Systems: A Network Perspective," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 179-192, May.
    5. A. Terry Bahill, 2012. "Diogenes, a process for identifying unintended consequences," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 287-306, September.
    6. Blake Roberts & Thomas Mazzuchi & Shahram Sarkani, 2016. "Engineered Resilience for Complex Systems as a Predictor for Cost Overruns," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 111-132, March.
    7. Dawn Gilbert & Mike Yearworth, 2016. "Complexity in a Systems Engineering Organization: An Empirical Case Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 422-435, September.
    8. Golnaz Vakili & Foroozossadat Tabatabaee & Siavash Khorsandi, 2013. "Emergence of cooperation in peer‐to‐peer systems: A complex adaptive system approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 213-223, June.
    9. Thomas Walworth & Mike Yearworth & Laura Shrieves & Hillary Sillitto, 2016. "Estimating Project Performance through a System Dynamics Learning Model," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 334-350, July.
    10. Shimon Fridkin & Sigal Kordova, 2022. "Examining Criteria for Choosing Subcontractors for Complex and Multi-Systems Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blake Roberts & Thomas Mazzuchi & Shahram Sarkani, 2016. "Engineered Resilience for Complex Systems as a Predictor for Cost Overruns," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 111-132, March.
    2. Nadezhda Shmeleva & Tatyana Tolstykh & Olga Dudareva, 2023. "Integration as a Driver of Enterprise Sustainability: The Russian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Richard Volkert & Jerrell Stracener & Junfang Yu, 2014. "Incorporating a Measure of Uncertainty into Systems of Systems Development Performance Measures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 297-312, September.
    4. Takehiro Inohara & Keith W. Hipel, 2008. "Coalition analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 343-359, December.
    5. Flavio Oquendo, 2019. "Architecting exogenous software‐intensive systems‐of‐systems on the internet‐of‐vehicles with SosADL," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 502-518, November.
    6. Austin Amaechi & Steve Counsell, 2013. "Towards an Approach for a Conceptual System Design," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 780-793, November.
    7. Mohsen Mosleh & Peter Ludlow & Babak Heydari, 2016. "Distributed Resource Management in Systems of Systems: An Architecture Perspective," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 362-374, July.
    8. Yacov Y. Haimes & Barry M. Horowitz & Zhenyu Guo & Eva Andrijcic & Joshua Bogdanor, 2015. "Assessing Systemic Risk to Cloud‐Computing Technology as Complex Interconnected Systems of Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 284-299, May.
    9. Jo Ann Lane & Barry Boehm, 2008. "System of systems lead system integrators: Where Do they spend their time and what makes them more or less efficient?," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 81-91, March.
    10. Alessandro Aliakbargolkar & Edward F. Crawley, 2013. "Architecting methodology for spatially and temporally distributed resource extraction systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 277-286, September.
    11. Jo Ann Lane & Tim Bohn, 2013. "Using SysML modeling to understand and evolve systems of systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 87-98, March.
    12. Bernard Collins & Steven Doskey & James Moreland, 2017. "Modeling the Convergence of Collaborative Systems of Systems: A Quantitative Case Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 357-378, July.
    13. Ali A. Yassine & Luke A. Wissmann, 2007. "The Implications of Product Architecture on the Firm," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 118-137, June.
    14. Miri Sitton & Yoram Reich, 2015. "Enterprise Systems Engineering for Better Operational Interoperability," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 625-638, November.
    15. Gloria Pumpuni‐Lenss & Timothy Blackburn & Andreas Garstenauer, 2017. "Resilience in Complex Systems: An Agent‐Based Approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 158-172, March.
    16. Dov Dvir & Aaron J. Shenhar & Shlomo Alkaher, 2003. "From a single discipline product to a multidisciplinary system: Adapting the right style to the right project," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 123-134.
    17. Paul T. Grogan & Sebastiaan A. Meijer, 2017. "Gaming Methods in Engineering Systems Research," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(6), pages 542-552, November.
    18. Jason E. Bartolomei & Daniel E. Hastings & Richard de Neufville & Donna H. Rhodes, 2012. "Engineering Systems Multiple‐Domain Matrix: An organizing framework for modeling large‐scale complex systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 41-61, March.
    19. Michael J. Pennock & William B. Rouse, 2016. "The Epistemology of Enterprises," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 24-43, January.
    20. Liwång, Hans, 2022. "Defense development: The role of co-creation in filling the gap between policy-makers and technology development," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:12:y:2009:i:4:p:295-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.