IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14882-d969290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Effect of Crowds on Passenger Behavior Inside Urban Trains through Laboratory Experiments—A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Seriani

    (Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontifica Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile)

  • Jose Miguel Barriga

    (Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago de Chile 7620001, Chile)

  • Alvaro Peña

    (Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontifica Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile)

  • Alejandra Valencia

    (Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontifica Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile)

  • Vicente Aprigliano

    (Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontifica Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile)

  • Lorena Jorquera

    (Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontifica Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile)

  • Hernan Pinto

    (Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontifica Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile)

  • Matías Valenzuela

    (Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontifica Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile)

  • Taku Fujiyama

    (Faculty of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Chadwick Building, Gower St., London WC1E 6BT, UK)

Abstract

The objective is to study the distribution of passengers inside urban trains for different levels of crowding. The study is carried out through the observation of videos made by laboratory experiments in which a mock-up of a carriage represented the boarding and alighting process. The Fruin’s Level of Service (LOS) was adopted, but with a different approach, in which the train is divided into five zones (central hall, central aisle, side aisle, central seats and side seats). The experiments are based on the behavior of passengers in the London Underground; however, this study could be expanded to any conventional rail or LRT system. For the laboratory experiments, it is proposed to build a metro carriage and a corresponding platform section, and the scenarios will include different levels of crowding of passengers boarding and alighting to produce a variation in the density on the platform. According to the crowding level, the results allow obtaining the distribution and movements generated by passengers in the five zones for different instants of time during the process of boarding and alighting. It is observed that passengers are distributed according to safety and efficiency conditions. For example, passengers tried to avoid contact with each other unless it is inevitable. In relation to comfort, the seats of the carriage are always used even if there is a low level of crowding. If the crowding level increases, the boarding and alighting time go up. In addition, passengers will spend one or two seconds more if the “let’s get off before getting on the carriage” behavior is breached. This kind of experiment can be used in further research as a way to test “what-if” scenarios using this new method of discretization of the space inside the train, which cannot be tested in existing stations due to restrictions such as the weather, variability of the train frequency, current design of the trains, among others. New experiments are necessary for future research to include other types of passengers such as people with disabilities or reduced mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Seriani & Jose Miguel Barriga & Alvaro Peña & Alejandra Valencia & Vicente Aprigliano & Lorena Jorquera & Hernan Pinto & Matías Valenzuela & Taku Fujiyama, 2022. "Analyzing the Effect of Crowds on Passenger Behavior Inside Urban Trains through Laboratory Experiments—A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14882-:d:969290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cox, Tom & Houdmont, Jonathan & Griffiths, Amanda, 2006. "Rail passenger crowding, stress, health and safety in Britain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 244-258, March.
    2. Sebastian Seriani & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes & Paola Moraga & Fabian Cortes, 2022. "Experimental Location of the Vertical Handrail to Improve the Accessibility of Wheelchair Passengers Boarding and Alighting at Metro Stations—A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Sebastian Seriani & Taku Fujiyama & Catherine Holloway, 2017. "Exploring the pedestrian level of interaction on platform conflict areas at metro stations by real-scale laboratory experiments," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 100-118, January.
    4. Marek Ogryzek & Daria Adamska-Kmieć & Anna Klimach, 2020. "Sustainable Transport: An Efficient Transportation Network—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Lam, William H. K. & Cheung, Chung-Yu & Lam, C. F., 1999. "A study of crowding effects at the Hong Kong light rail transit stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 401-415, June.
    6. Fernández, Rodrigo & Valencia, Alejandra & Seriani, Sebastian, 2015. "On passenger saturation flow in public transport doors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 102-112.
    7. Serge P. Hoogendoorn & W. Daamen, 2005. "Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 147-159, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Lishan & Luo, Wei & Yao, Liya & Qiu, Shi & Rong, Jian, 2017. "A comparative study of funnel shape bottlenecks in subway stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 14-27.
    2. Ji, Yanjie & Gao, Liangpeng & Chen, Dandan & Ma, Xinwei & Zhang, Ruochen, 2018. "How does a static measure influence passengers’ boarding behaviors and bus dwell time? Simulated evidence from Nanjing bus stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 13-25.
    3. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid & Shahhoseini, Zahra, 2019. "When ‘push’ does not come to ‘shove’: Revisiting ‘faster is slower’ in collective egress of human crowds," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 51-69.
    4. Matias Kulczewski & Andres Wilson & Sebastian Seriani & Taku Fujiyama, 2022. "Factorial Design with Simulation for the Optimization of the Level of Service in the Platform-Train Interface of Metro Stations—A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Paudel, Jayash, 2021. "Bus ridership and service reliability: The case of public transportation in Western Massachusetts," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 98-107.
    6. Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Wei & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Trial-and-error train fare design scheme for addressing boarding/alighting congestion at CBD stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 318-335.
    7. Sewmini Jayatilake & Jonathan M. Bunker & Ashish Bhaskar & Marc Miska, 2021. "Time–space analysis to evaluate cell-based quality of service in bus rapid transit station platforms through passenger-specific area," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 395-427, June.
    8. Tirachini, Alejandro & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Dekker, Thijs & Daziano, Ricardo A., 2017. "Estimation of crowding discomfort in public transport: Results from Santiago de Chile," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 311-326.
    9. Paulo Aguayo & Sebastian Seriani & Jose Delpiano & Gonzalo Farias & Taku Fujiyama & Sergio A. Velastin, 2023. "Experimental Method to Estimate the Density of Passengers on Urban Railway Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Mira Küpper & Armin Seyfried, 2020. "Analysis of Space Usage on Train Station Platforms Based on Trajectory Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Yurong Mo & Shiyao Qiu & Jiali Tang & Zhihong Li, 2024. "Investigating the Dynamics of Pedestrian Flow through Different Transition Bottlenecks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Hänseler, Flurin S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Scarinci, Riccardo, 2016. "Assessing the usage and level-of-service of pedestrian facilities in train stations: A Swiss case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 106-123.
    13. de Palma, André & Lindsey, Robin, 2001. "Optimal timetables for public transportation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 789-813, September.
    14. Tianxing Dai & Brian D. Taylor, 2023. "Three’s a crowd? Examining evolving public transit crowding standards amidst the COVID-19 pandemic," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 321-341, June.
    15. Zhonghua Wei & Sinan Chu & Zhengde Huang & Shi Qiu & Qixuan Zhao, 2020. "Optimization Design of X-ray Conveyer Belt Length for Subway Security Check Systems in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Sebastian Seriani & Vicente Aprigliano & Shirley Gonzalez & Gabriela Baeza & Ariel Lopez & Taku Fujiyama, 2024. "The Effect of Seat Layout on the Interaction of Passengers Inside the Train Carriage: An Experimental Approach for Urban Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Basu, Debasis & Hunt, John Douglas, 2012. "Valuing of attributes influencing the attractiveness of suburban train service in Mumbai city: A stated preference approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1465-1476.
    18. Li, Zheng & Hensher, David A., 2011. "Crowding and public transport: A review of willingness to pay evidence and its relevance in project appraisal," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 880-887, November.
    19. Mahdi Rezapour & F. Richard Ferraro, 2021. "The impact of commuters’ psychological feelings due to delay on perceived quality of a rail transport," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, December.
    20. Wang, Bin & Zacharias, John, 2020. "Noise, odor and passenger density in perceived crowding in public transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 215-223.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14882-:d:969290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.