IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1391-d1334807.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Dynamics of Pedestrian Flow through Different Transition Bottlenecks

Author

Listed:
  • Yurong Mo

    (Jiangxi Traffic Monitoring Command Center, Nanchang 330036, China)

  • Shiyao Qiu

    (Department of Transportation, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Jiali Tang

    (Jiangxi Traffic Monitoring Command Center, Nanchang 330036, China)

  • Zhihong Li

    (Department of Transportation, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

Congestion and queues are crucial factors in high-passenger flow areas, affecting both traffic efficiency and pedestrian comfort. Ensuring pedestrian safety in bottleneck areas is of utmost importance, and understanding flow characteristics is essential to improving resilience levels. In this study, a comparative experiment was conducted to investigate crowd dynamics in different transition bottleneck types, including straight, right-angle, and curve transitions. Pedestrian flow data were analyzed to examine the impact of transition shape on pedestrian characteristics, such as passing time, speeds, trajectories, and densities within the bottleneck. The results indicate that the curve bottleneck outperforms the other two types, significantly improving traffic capacity, particularly when the pedestrian rate ranges from 0.5 to 1.25 person/s. The curve bottleneck demonstrates the minimum passing time, lowest density, and fastest passing speed. Moreover, under various flow rates, the cumulative maximum pedestrian density of curve bottlenecks is consistently smaller than the other types. These findings offer valuable insights for designing and managing pedestrian flow in bottleneck areas to ensure safety and resilience levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Yurong Mo & Shiyao Qiu & Jiali Tang & Zhihong Li, 2024. "Investigating the Dynamics of Pedestrian Flow through Different Transition Bottlenecks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1391-:d:1334807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1391/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1391/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armin Seyfried & Oliver Passon & Bernhard Steffen & Maik Boltes & Tobias Rupprecht & Wolfram Klingsch, 2009. "New Insights into Pedestrian Flow Through Bottlenecks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 395-406, August.
    2. Li, Na & Guo, Ren-Yong, 2020. "Simulation of bi-directional pedestrian flow through a bottleneck: Cell transmission model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 555(C).
    3. Tang, Ming & Jia, Hongfei & Ran, Bin & Li, Jun, 2016. "Analysis of the pedestrian arching at bottleneck based on a bypassing behavior model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 453(C), pages 242-258.
    4. Song, Weiguo & Xu, Xuan & Wang, Bing-Hong & Ni, Shunjiang, 2006. "Simulation of evacuation processes using a multi-grid model for pedestrian dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 363(2), pages 492-500.
    5. Fernández, Rodrigo & Valencia, Alejandra & Seriani, Sebastian, 2015. "On passenger saturation flow in public transport doors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 102-112.
    6. Serge P. Hoogendoorn & W. Daamen, 2005. "Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 147-159, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid & Shahhoseini, Zahra, 2019. "When ‘push’ does not come to ‘shove’: Revisiting ‘faster is slower’ in collective egress of human crowds," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 51-69.
    2. Sun, Lishan & Luo, Wei & Yao, Liya & Qiu, Shi & Rong, Jian, 2017. "A comparative study of funnel shape bottlenecks in subway stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 14-27.
    3. Haghani, Milad, 2021. "The knowledge domain of crowd dynamics: Anatomy of the field, pioneering studies, temporal trends, influential entities and outside-domain impact," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 580(C).
    4. Yue, Hao & Zhang, Junyao & Chen, Wenxin & Wu, Xinsen & Zhang, Xu & Shao, Chunfu, 2021. "Simulation of the influence of spatial obstacles on evacuation pedestrian flow in walking facilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    5. Cao, Shuchao & Lian, Liping & Chen, Mingyi & Yao, Ming & Song, Weiguo & Fang, Zhiming, 2018. "Investigation of difference of fundamental diagrams in pedestrian flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 661-670.
    6. Hu, Yanghui & Zhang, Jun & Song, Weiguo, 2019. "Experimental study on the movement strategies of individuals in multidirectional flows," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    7. Wang, Jiayue & Boltes, Maik & Seyfried, Armin & Zhang, Jun & Ziemer, Verena & Weng, Wenguo, 2018. "Linking pedestrian flow characteristics with stepping locomotion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 500(C), pages 106-120.
    8. Fang, Zhi-Ming & Song, Wei-Guo & Liu, Xuan & Lv, Wei & Ma, Jian & Xiao, Xia, 2012. "A continuous distance model (CDM) for the single-file pedestrian movement considering step frequency and length," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(1), pages 307-316.
    9. Milad Haghani & Majid Sarvi & Zahra Shahhoseini & Maik Boltes, 2016. "How Simple Hypothetical-Choice Experiments Can Be Utilized to Learn Humans’ Navigational Escape Decisions in Emergencies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Abdelghany, Ahmed & Abdelghany, Khaled & Mahmassani, Hani, 2016. "A hybrid simulation-assignment modeling framework for crowd dynamics in large-scale pedestrian facilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 159-176.
    11. Sebastian Seriani & Jose Miguel Barriga & Alvaro Peña & Alejandra Valencia & Vicente Aprigliano & Lorena Jorquera & Hernan Pinto & Matías Valenzuela & Taku Fujiyama, 2022. "Analyzing the Effect of Crowds on Passenger Behavior Inside Urban Trains through Laboratory Experiments—A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Jiang, Yan-Qun & Hu, Ying-Gang & Huang, Xiaoqian, 2022. "Modeling pedestrian flow through a bottleneck based on a second-order continuum model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 608(P1).
    13. Huang, Shenshi & Zhang, Teng & Lo, Siuming & Lu, Shouxiang & Li, Changhai, 2018. "Experimental study of individual and single-file pedestrian movement in narrow seat aisle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 1023-1033.
    14. Huang, Rong & Zhao, Xuan & Zhou, Chenyu & Kong, Lingchen & Liu, Chengqing & Yu, Qiang, 2022. "Static floor field construction and fine discrete cellular automaton model: Algorithms, simulations and insights," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    15. Yamamoto, Hiroki & Yanagisawa, Daichi & Feliciani, Claudio & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2019. "Body-rotation behavior of pedestrians for collision avoidance in passing and cross flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 486-510.
    16. Li, Zitong & Lo, S.M. & Ma, Jian & Luo, X.W., 2020. "A study on passengers’ alighting and boarding process at metro platform by computer simulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 840-854.
    17. Liao, Weichen & Tordeux, Antoine & Seyfried, Armin & Chraibi, Mohcine & Drzycimski, Kevin & Zheng, Xiaoping & Zhao, Ying, 2016. "Measuring the steady state of pedestrian flow in bottleneck experiments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 461(C), pages 248-261.
    18. Zhang, Xinwei & Zhang, Peihong & Zhong, Maohua, 2021. "A dual adaptive cellular automaton model based on a composite field and pedestrian heterogeneity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    19. He, Mengchen & Wang, Qiao & Chen, Juan & Xu, Shiwei & Ma, Jian, 2023. "Modeling pedestrian walking behavior in the flow field with moving walkways," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 619(C).
    20. Steffen, B. & Seyfried, A., 2010. "Methods for measuring pedestrian density, flow, speed and direction with minimal scatter," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(9), pages 1902-1910.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1391-:d:1334807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.