IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14802-d968181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitalisation of Agricultural Production for Precision Farming: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Karina R. Mukhamedova

    (Institute of Engineering and Information Technologies, Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan)

  • Natalya P. Cherepkova

    (Institute of Engineering and Information Technologies, Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan)

  • Alexandr V. Korotkov

    (Institute of Engineering and Information Technologies, Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan)

  • Zhanerke B. Dagasheva

    (Institute of Engineering and Information Technologies, Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan)

  • Manuela Tvaronavičienė

    (Department of Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Sauletekio 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
    Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Daugavpils University, Parades Str. 1-421, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia)

Abstract

The introduction of a digital platform for practical use at an agro-industrial enterprise is of great practical importance for the development of precision farming. Modern digital information systems are an integral part of precision farming and, in many ways, their foundation. During the work on the Farm Management Information Systems (FMIS) project, software and methodological framework for the use of precision farming techniques and information technologies for managing the process of growing crops in the field was developed. The introduction of a digital platform was carried out as an important experiment. Research methods such as bibliographic analysis and statistical processing were used. This study used modelling and statistical estimation of parameters. The findings were used to estimate the volume of transactions. In addition, during the experiment, communication schemes were worked out. The channel for receiving and transmitting information was tested, along with the channel-forming equipment (routers, switches, gateways) and the basic settings. The study checked the integration of the platform with external systems. A test was carried out for the passage of digital signals to the platform, including various electronic forms and reports. The recommendation for the policy planner is to ensure the required accuracy of the results. The practical value of our findings is that the electronic recording and preservation of the history of fieldwork and crops can help agro-industry workers in preparing special reports on the production cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Karina R. Mukhamedova & Natalya P. Cherepkova & Alexandr V. Korotkov & Zhanerke B. Dagasheva & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2022. "Digitalisation of Agricultural Production for Precision Farming: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14802-:d:968181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Svetlana Mikhailovna Bychkova & Nadezhda Nikolaevna Makarova & Elena Anatolyevna Zhidkova, 2018. "Measurement of information in the subsystem of internal control of the controlling system of organizations of the agro-industrial complex," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(1), pages 35-43, September.
    2. Ehlers, Melf-Hinrich & Huber, Robert & Finger, Robert, 2021. "Agricultural policy in the era of digitalisation," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Svetlana Mikhailovna Bychkova & Nadezhda Nikolaevna Makarova & Elena Anatolyevna Zhidkova, 2018. "Measurement of information in the subsystem of internal control of the controlling system of organizations of the agro-industrial complex," Post-Print hal-02121006, HAL.
    4. Regina Birner & Thomas Daum & Carl Pray, 2021. "Who drives the digital revolution in agriculture? A review of supply‐side trends, players and challenges," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1260-1285, December.
    5. Zbigniew Nasalski, 2021. "Determinants of agricultural farm participation in regional economic systems," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(1), pages 374-384, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Svetlana Mikhailovna Bychkova & Elena Anatolyevna Zhidkova & Dmitriy Vitalievich Eliashev, 2019. "Production activity control methods of the agricultural organizations," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1330-1340, December.
    2. Klingenberg, Cristina Orsolin & Valle Antunes Júnior, José Antônio & Müller-Seitz, Gordon, 2022. "Impacts of digitalization on value creation and capture: Evidence from the agricultural value chain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    3. Rachel Opitz & Philippe De Smedt & Victorino Mayoral-Herrera & Stefano Campana & Marco Vieri & Eamonn Baldwin & Carolina Perna & Daniele Sarri & Jeroen Verhegge, 2023. "Practicing Critical Zone Observation in Agricultural Landscapes: Communities, Technology, Environment and Archaeology," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Mathilde Aubry & Ben Hamadi & Roland Condor & Nazik Fadil & Christine Fournes, 2022. "Exploring digitalisation in the agri-food sector and its paradoxes: Evidence from a comparative study with small French companies," Post-Print hal-04430806, HAL.
    5. McGrath, Karen & Brown, Claire & Regan, Áine & Russell, Tomás, 2023. "Investigating narratives and trends in digital agriculture: A scoping study of social and behavioural science studies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Basharat Ali & Peter Dahlhaus, 2022. "Roles of Selective Agriculture Practices in Sustainable Agricultural Performance: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Metta, Matteo & Ciliberti, Stefano & Obi, Chinedu & Bartolini, Fabio & Klerkx, Laurens & Brunori, Gianluca, 2022. "An integrated socio-cyber-physical system framework to assess responsible digitalisation in agriculture: A first application with Living Labs in Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Sarah Hackfort, 2021. "Patterns of Inequalities in Digital Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Michelson, Hope & Gourlay, Sydney & Lybbert, Travis & Wollburg, Philip, 2023. "Review: Purchased agricultural input quality and small farms," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    10. Sukoluhle Mazwane & Moraka N. Makhura & Mmapatla P. Senyolo, 2022. "Important Policy Parameters for the Development of Inclusive Digital Agriculture: Implications for the Redistributive Land Reform Program in South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Tilman Reinhardt, 2023. "The farm to fork strategy and the digital transformation of the agrifood sector—An assessment from the perspective of innovation systems," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 819-838, June.
    12. Robert Finger, 2023. "Digital innovations for sustainable and resilient agricultural systems," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(4), pages 1277-1309.
    13. Ingram, Julie & Maye, Damian & Bailye, Clive & Barnes, Andrew & Bear, Christopher & Bell, Matthew & Cutress, David & Davies, Lynfa & de Boon, Auvikki & Dinnie, Liz & Gairdner, Julian & Hafferty, Caitl, 2022. "What are the priority research questions for digital agriculture?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    14. Ryota Nakatani, 2024. "Food companies' productivity dynamics: Exploring the role of intangible assets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 185-226, January.
    15. Schnebelin, Éléonore, 2022. "Linking the diversity of ecologisation models to farmers' digital use profiles," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    16. Juan D. Borrero & Jesús Mariscal, 2022. "A Case Study of a Digital Data Platform for the Agricultural Sector: A Valuable Decision Support System for Small Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Galaz, Victor & Centeno, Miguel A. & Callahan, Peter W. & Causevic, Amar & Patterson, Thayer & Brass, Irina & Baum, Seth & Farber, Darryl & Fischer, Joern & Garcia, David & McPhearson, Timon & Jimenez, 2021. "Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    18. Jie Lv & Lu Huang & Xiaoting Li, 2022. "Does the Creation of Food Safety Demonstration Cities Promote Agricultural Development? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Wolfert, Sjaak & Verdouw, Cor & van Wassenaer, Lan & Dolfsma, Wilfred & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Digital innovation ecosystems in agri-food: design principles and organizational framework," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    20. Sandija Zeverte-Rivza & Laura Girdziute & Agnieszka Parlińska & Peteris Rivza & Anastasija Novikova & Ina Gudele, 2023. "Digitalisation in Bioeconomy in the Baltic States and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14802-:d:968181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.