IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7751-d1736519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Livestock Sector in Serbia: Challenges, Structural Gaps, and Strategic Pathways Towards Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Dragovan Milićević

    (Independent Researcher, 26300 Vršac, Serbia)

  • Ljiljana Samolovac

    (Institute for Animal Husbandry, Autoput Beograd-Zagreb, 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Miloš Lukić

    (Institute for Animal Husbandry, Autoput Beograd-Zagreb, 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dragan Milićević

    (Institute for Meat Hygiene and Technology, 13 Kaćanskog St., 11040 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

The livestock sector in Serbia has been experiencing a prolonged period of structural and economic challenges, characterized by decreasing animal numbers, low productivity, and reduced competitiveness in both domestic and EU markets. This study analyses the key structural, technological, economic, and policy factors shaping these trends to provide strategic recommendations for sustainable sector revitalization. The methodology integrates macroeconomic analysis, agricultural economic accounts, and international trade data, applying regression modelling to examine relationships between domestic food prices, exchange rates, and agri-food import volumes. The results indicate that livestock’s share of agricultural gross value added remains below 35%, significantly lower than EU averages, while export quotas remain underutilized and the trade balance for animal products is persistently negative. Contributing factors include fragmented farm structures, outdated production technologies, limited adoption of innovations, demographic decline in rural areas, and insufficient alignment with EU CAP Strategic Plans and Green Deal objectives. Climate change impacts, such as droughts and heat stress, alongside animal disease outbreaks and macroeconomic pressures, further exacerbate these vulnerabilities. The study recommends modernizing production systems through investment in technological upgrades, strengthening farmer organizations and cooperatives, enhancing biosecurity and animal welfare standards, and improving policy frameworks to align with EU sustainability objectives. Emphasis is placed on developing integrated approaches that simultaneously address productivity, economic resilience, and environmental sustainability. Implementing these strategic measures is essential for enhancing food security, supporting rural development, and ensuring Serbia’s successful integration into the EU market as part of a more sustainable and resilient agri-food system.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragovan Milićević & Ljiljana Samolovac & Miloš Lukić & Dragan Milićević, 2025. "Livestock Sector in Serbia: Challenges, Structural Gaps, and Strategic Pathways Towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7751-:d:1736519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7751/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7751/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarina Đurić & Drago Cvijanović & Radivoj Prodanović & Miroslav Čavlin & Boris Kuzman & Mirjana Lukač Bulatović, 2019. "Serbian Agriculture Policy: Economic Analysis Using the PSE Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Karina R. Mukhamedova & Natalya P. Cherepkova & Alexandr V. Korotkov & Zhanerke B. Dagasheva & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2022. "Digitalisation of Agricultural Production for Precision Farming: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Sarah Velten & Julia Leventon & Nicolas Jager & Jens Newig, 2015. "What Is Sustainable Agriculture? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-33, June.
    4. Nicolae Istudor & Marius Constantin & Donatella Privitera & Raluca Ignat & Irina-Elena Petrescu & Cristian Teodor, 2025. "Systemic Competitiveness in the EU Cereal Value Chain: A Network Perspective for Policy Alignment," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, March.
    5. Aleksandra Gajić & Nikola Krunić & Branko Protić, 2021. "Classification of Rural Areas in Serbia: Framework and Implications for Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Vedran Živanović & Marko Joksimović & Rajko Golić & Vladimir Malinić & Filip Krstić & Marko Sedlak & Aleksandar Kovjanić, 2022. "Depopulated and Abandoned Areas in Serbia in the 21st Century—From a Local to a National Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milka Bubalo Živković & Bojan Đerčan & Predrag Mlinarević & Marija Cimbaljević & Zorica Pogrmić & Tamara Lukić & Bojana Kalenjuk Pivarski & Goran Balotić & Dejan Pljuco & Milan Lalić & Nikola Lopatić, 2025. "Rural Tourism as a Factor of Rural Revitalization and Sustainability in the Republic of Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Georgieva, Vanya & Guerov, Gueorgui & Blagoeva, Nadezhda, . "Impact of economic and environmental factors on agricultural product pricing in the EU," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(4).
    3. Bożena Nosecka & Łukasz Zaremba, 2025. "The International Competitiveness of Polish Fruit and Their Preserves," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Piotr Sulewski, 2019. "Between the Social and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability in Rural Areas—In Search of Farmers’ Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Phélinas, Pascale & Choumert, Johanna, 2017. "Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 452-462.
    6. Amanda Balasooriya & Darshana Sedera, 2025. "Top Management Challenges in Using Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development Goals: An Exploratory Case Study of an Australian Agribusiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Muhammed Yasin Taskesenlioglu & Sezai Ercisli & Muhammed Kupe & Nazan Ercisli, 2022. "History of Grape in Anatolia and Historical Sustainable Grape Production in Erzincan Agroecological Conditions in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Anna Kocira & Mariola Staniak, 2025. "Role of Agriculture in Implementing the Concept of Sustainable Food System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-5, May.
    9. Matteo Zavalloni & Meri Raggi & Davide Viaggi, 2016. "Assessing Collective Measures in Rural Policy: The Effect of Minimum Participation Rules on the Distribution of Benefits from Irrigation Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Cecilia M. V. B. Almeida & Biagio F. Giannetti & Feni Agostinho & Gengyuan Liu & Zhifeng Yang, 2021. "What Are the Stimuli to Change to a Sustainable Post-COVID-19 Society?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Emilia Schmitt & Daniel Keech & Damian Maye & Dominique Barjolle & James Kirwan, 2016. "Comparing the Sustainability of Local and Global Food Chains: A Case Study of Cheese Products in Switzerland and the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Monika Hejna & Elisabetta Onelli & Alessandra Moscatelli & Maurizio Bellotto & Cinzia Cristiani & Nadia Stroppa & Luciana Rossi, 2021. "Heavy-Metal Phytoremediation from Livestock Wastewater and Exploitation of Exhausted Biomass," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Onwuadiochi, I. C & Onyeanusi, C. C & Mage, J. O., 2021. "Assessment Of Rainfall Variability For Sustainable Agriculture In Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria," Journal Clean WAS (JCleanWAS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 39-46, July.
    15. Jacqueline Loos & Henrik Von Wehrden, 2018. "Beyond Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing Constitutes Sustainable Agriculture in European Cultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-11, May.
    16. Thanh Ngo & Hai‐Dang Nguyen & Huong Ho & Vo‐Kien Nguyen & Thuy T. T. Dao & Hai T. H. Nguyen, 2021. "Assessing the important factors of sustainable agriculture development: An Indicateurs de Durabilité des Exploitations Agricoles‐Analytic Hierarchy Process study in the northern region of Vietnam," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 327-338, March.
    17. Stan Selbonne & Loïc Guindé & François Causeret & Pierre Chopin & Jorge Sierra & Régis Tournebize & Jean-Marc Blazy, 2023. "How to Measure the Performance of Farms with Regard to Climate-Smart Agriculture Goals? A Set of Indicators and Its Application in Guadeloupe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Vladimir Malinić & Uroš Durlević & Ljiljana Brašanac-Bosanac & Ivan Novković & Marko Joksimović & Rajko Golić & Filip Krstić, 2025. "A Hybrid Fuzzy AHP–MULTIMOORA Approach for Solar Energy Development on Rural Brownfield Sites in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-33, September.
    19. Lin Wang & Guofang Hu & Yaojie Yue & Xinyue Ye & Min Li & Jintao Zhao & Jinhong Wan, 2016. "GIS-Based Risk Assessment of Hail Disasters Affecting Cotton and Its Spatiotemporal Evolution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Mutaz Alshafeey & Asefeh Asemi & Omar Rashdan, 2018. "Industrial revolution 4.0, renewable energy: A content analysis," Proceedings of FIKUSZ 2018, in: Proceedings of FIKUSZ '18, pages 23-31, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7751-:d:1736519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.