IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13114-d940948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Assess Emergency Suppliers

Author

Listed:
  • Huilin Li

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Jiaqi Yang

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Ziquan Xiang

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

Abstract

Under the influence of COVID-19, various emergency supplies have repeatedly broken links, seriously affecting normal life and hindering the sustainable development of enterprises and society. Therefore, suitable emergency suppliers are crucial. To prioritize and select suitable emergency suppliers, key indicators were determined, and evaluation models were established based on the characteristics of epidemic situations and epidemic prevention materials. The application of the MCDM (multi-criteria decision-making) issue combining fuzzy SWARA (the stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis) and the actor analysis method to emergency supplier selection studies, called the fuzzy SWARA-based actor analysis method, is used to identify appropriate suppliers for optimizing pre-preparation. Results of evaluation system weight computations by the Fuzzy SWARA-based actor analysis method show that the overall prioritization of four non-economic factors in ranking orders are “Delivery Capacity”, “Flexible Supply Capacity”, “Quality”, and “Social Evaluation and Reputation”. For the inclusion of conflicting standards and the unquantifiable feature, economic and non-economic factors were discussed separately and evaluated by language variables. Additionally, the fuzzy actor analysis indicated that economic factors and non-economic factors need to be considered comprehensively for emergency supplier selection. This method has good operability and reference value, convenient for the final choice making according to actual situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Huilin Li & Jiaqi Yang & Ziquan Xiang, 2022. "A Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Assess Emergency Suppliers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13114-:d:940948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13114/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13114/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhexuan Zhou & Yajie Dou & Tianjun Liao & Yuejin Tan, 2018. "A Preference Model for Supplier Selection Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Jianzhong Xu & Jiaqi Zhai, 2020. "Research on the Evaluation of Green Innovation Capability of Manufacturing Enterprises in Innovation Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Qin, Jindong & Liu, Xinwang & Pedrycz, Witold, 2017. "An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 626-638.
    4. Kaur, Harpreet & Prakash Singh, Surya, 2021. "Multi-stage hybrid model for supplier selection and order allocation considering disruption risks and disruptive technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. J.H. Ruan & X.P. Wang & F.T.S. Chan & Y. Shi, 2016. "Optimizing the intermodal transportation of emergency medical supplies using balanced fuzzy clustering," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(14), pages 4368-4386, July.
    6. Guohua Qu & Zhijie Zhang & Weihua Qu & Zeshui Xu, 2020. "Green Supplier Selection Based on Green Practices Evaluated Using Fuzzy Approaches of TOPSIS and ELECTRE with a Case Study in a Chinese Internet Company," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-32, May.
    7. Burcu Balcik & Deniz Ak, 2014. "Supplier Selection for Framework Agreements in Humanitarian Relief," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(6), pages 1028-1041, June.
    8. Pratibha Rani & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro & Dalia Štreimikienė & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan, 2020. "Pythagorean Fuzzy SWARA–VIKOR Framework for Performance Evaluation of Solar Panel Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Shaolong & Dong, Zhijie Sasha, 2019. "Supplier selection and pre-positioning strategy in humanitarian relief," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 287-298.
    2. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "Measuring the Environmental Maturity of the Supply Chain Finance: A Big Data-Based Multi-Criteria Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Mohammed, Ahmed & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Koh, Lenny & Hubbard, Nicolas & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Al Ahmed, Teejan, 2022. "The sourcing decision-making process in the era of digitalization: A new quantitative methodology," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Federico Toffano & Michele Garraffa & Yiqing Lin & Steven Prestwich & Helmut Simonis & Nic Wilson, 2022. "A multi-objective supplier selection framework based on user-preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 609-640, January.
    5. Yi-Kuei Lin & Cheng-Fu Huang & Yi-Chieh Liao, 2019. "Reliability of a stochastic intermodal logistics network under spoilage and time considerations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(1), pages 95-118, June.
    6. Jingxian Chen & Liang Liang & Dong-Qing Yao, 2017. "Pre-positioning of relief inventories for non-profit organizations: a newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 259(1), pages 35-63, December.
    7. Davis-Sramek, Beth & Robinson, Jessica L. & Darby, Jessica L. & Thomas, Rodney W., 2020. "Exploring the differential roles of environmental and social sustainability in carrier selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Mohammad Reza Salehizadeh & Mahdi Amidi Koohbijari & Hassan Nouri & Akın Taşcıkaraoğlu & Ozan Erdinç & João P. S. Catalão, 2019. "Bi-Objective Optimization Model for Optimal Placement of Thyristor-Controlled Series Compensator Devices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Maciej Urbaniak & Piotr Rogala & Piotr Kafel, 2023. "Expectations of manufacturing companies regarding future priorities of improvement actions taken by their suppliers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 296-310, March.
    10. Kaklauskas, A. & Zavadskas, E.K. & Banaitis, A. & Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I. & Liberman, A. & Dzitac, S. & Ubarte, I. & Binkyte, A. & Cerkauskas, J. & Kuzminske, A. & Naumcik, A., 2018. "A neuro-advertising property video recommendation system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 78-93.
    11. Alaa Alden Al Mohamed & Sobhi Al Mohamed, 2023. "Application of fuzzy group decision-making selecting green supplier: a case study of the manufacture of natural laurel soap," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Sengul Orgut, Irem & Freeman, Nickolas & Lewis, Dwight & Parton, Jason, 2023. "Equitable and effective vaccine access considering vaccine hesitancy and capacity constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Katerina Fotova Čiković & Ivana Martinčević & Joško Lozić, 2022. "Application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in the Selection of Sustainable Suppliers: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, May.
    14. Amin Mahmoudi & Saad Ahmed Javed, 2022. "Probabilistic Approach to Multi-Stage Supplier Evaluation: Confidence Level Measurement in Ordinal Priority Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1051-1096, October.
    15. Junhu Ruan & Felix T. S. Chan & Xiaofeng Zhao, 2018. "Re-Planning the Intermodal Transportation of Emergency Medical Supplies with Updated Transfer Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Urbaniak Maciej, 2021. "Role of supplier evaluation criteria in risk mitigation related to purchasing process," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 96-106, June.
    17. Yongmao Xiao & Renqing Zhao & Wei Yan & Xiaoyong Zhu, 2022. "Analysis and Evaluation of Energy Consumption and Carbon Emission Levels of Products Produced by Different Kinds of Equipment Based on Green Development Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Kamalini Ramdas & Alp Sungu, 2022. "Social impact operations at the global base of the pyramid," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4364-4378, December.
    19. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić, 2023. "Industrial and Management Applications of Type-2 Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Techniques Extended with Type-2 Fuzzy Sets from 2013 to 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Keyan Zheng & Fagang Hu & Yaliu Yang, 2023. "Data-Driven Evaluation and Recommendations for Regional Synergy Innovation Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13114-:d:940948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.