IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13081-d940422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of Measuring Local Governments’ Information Disclosure: Comparing Transparency Indices in Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Juan-Carlos Garrido-Rodríguez

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Marta Garrido-Montañés

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Germán López-Pérez

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Elisabeth Zafra-Gómez

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Transparency is considered a key element for developing a reliable government; it is the ability that all public entities have to provide access to all their information. The main objective of this work is to test the differences in the transparency of municipalities between the main indices and a new index made following the regulatory advances in this area at the national level. Called BTI, this new index aims to measure in the best possible way the degree of compliance of Spanish municipalities, through two dimensions (depth and breadth), which measure the quality and the quantity of the information. This work makes a comparison of the BTI with three of the main existing transparency indexes in Spain, to a sample of Spanish provincial capitals. The results obtained reveal clear differences between the indices, where three of the four indices analyzed show that most municipalities only fulfil the Transparency Act at the minimum level, with only a few municipalities reaching the maximum rating range. This work concludes that the BTI index is more demanding than the rest of the indexes. However, ITA stands out with a higher average score than the rest, which indicates that transparency portals are designed to obtain a good score in this index, being less objective. Finally, this paper remembers the importance of having an objective tool to measure transparency, as it can show notable differences with respect to reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan-Carlos Garrido-Rodríguez & Marta Garrido-Montañés & Germán López-Pérez & Elisabeth Zafra-Gómez, 2022. "The Importance of Measuring Local Governments’ Information Disclosure: Comparing Transparency Indices in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13081-:d:940422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13081/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13081/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdullah Abid Oztoprak & Erna Ruijer, 2016. "Variants of transparency: an analysis of the English Local Government Transparency Code 2015," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 536-556, July.
    2. Hafiez Sofyani & Hosam Alden Riyadh & Heru Fahlevi, 2020. "Improving service quality, accountability and transparency of local government: The intervening role of information technology governance," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1735690-173, January.
    3. Raymond Saner & Lichia Yiu & Melanie Nguyen, 2020. "Monitoring the SDGs: Digital and social technologies to ensure citizen participation, inclusiveness and transparency," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(4), pages 483-500, July.
    4. Armenia ANDRONICEANU, 2021. "Transparency In Public Administration As A Challenge For A Good Democratic Governance," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2021(36), pages 149-164, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Hochstetter & Felipe Vásquez & Mauricio Diéguez & Ana Bustamante & Jeferson Arango-López, 2023. "Transparency and E-Government in Electronic Public Procurement as Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Cañizares-Espada Manuela & Muñoz-Colomina Clara Isabel & Pérez-Estébanez Raquel & Urquía-Grande Elena, 2021. "Transparency and Accessibility in Municipalities: The Case of Social Services in Spain," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 15(5), pages 31-54, June.
    3. Pavel Krpálek & Kateřina Berková & Andrea Kubišová & Katarína Krpálková Krelová & Dagmar Frendlovská & Daniela Spiesová, 2021. "Formation of Professional Competences and Soft Skills of Public Administration Employees for Sustainable Professional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    4. George Lãzãroiu & Armenia Androniceanu & Iulia Grecu & Gheorghe Grecu & Octav Neguri?ã, 2022. "Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things sensing networks, and sustainable cyber-physical management systems in big data-driven cognitive manufacturing," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1047-1080, December.
    5. Popkova, Elena G. & Bogoviz, Aleksei V. & Lobova, Svetlana V. & DeLo, Piper & Alekseev, Alexander N. & Sergi, Bruno S., 2023. "Environmentally sustainable policies in the petroleum sector through the lens of industry 4.0. Russians Lukoil and Gazprom: The COVID-19 crisis of 2020 vs sanctions crisis of 2022," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Kristina Jönsson & Magdalena Bexell, 2021. "Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals: The case of Tanzania," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(2), pages 181-196, March.
    7. Ane-Mari ANDRONICEANU & Jani KINNUNEN & Irina GEORGESCU, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Motivations To Start New Businesses: A Panel Data Analysis," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 479-491, November.
    8. Rizal Haliman & Sadjijono & Slamet Suhartono & Hufron, 2021. "The nature of the expansion of the Authority of The State Administrative Court regarding Government Administration Law," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 25(1), pages 108-114, November.
    9. Shin-Cheng Yeh & Ai-Wei Wu & Hui-Ching Yu & Homer C. Wu & Yi-Ping Kuo & Pei-Xuan Chen, 2021. "Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence and Its Connections to the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-34, August.
    10. Panagiota Xanthopoulou & Alexandros Sahinidis & Zorzeta Bakaki, 2022. "The Impact of Strong Cultures on Organisational Performance in Public Organisations: The Case of the Greek Public Administration," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Bożena Gajdzik & Włodzimierz Sroka & Jolita Vveinhardt, 2021. "Energy Intensity of Steel Manufactured Utilising EAF Technology as a Function of Investments Made: The Case of the Steel Industry in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Bozena Guziana, 2021. "Only for Citizens? Local Political Engagement in Sweden and Inclusiveness of Terms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Amal Marzouki & Arbi Chouikh & Sehl Mellouli & Rim Haddad, 2021. "From Sustainable Development Goals to Sustainable Cities: A Social Media Analysis for Policy-Making Decision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    14. repec:thr:techub:10025:y:2021:i:1:p:108-114 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Irina Dijmãrescu & Mariana Iatagan & Iulian Hurloiu & Marinela Geamãnu & Ciprian Rusescu & Adrian Dijmãrescu, 2022. "Neuromanagement decision making in facial recognition biometric authentication as a mobile payment technology in retail, restaurant, and hotel business models," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(1), pages 225-250, March.
    16. Catriona REID & Stefan Gabriel BURCEA, 2022. "Strategic Spatial Planning In Irish Local Communities," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(3), pages 4-9, December.
    17. Nestor Shpak & Zoriana Dvulit & Liana Maznyk & Włodzimierz Sroka&# & Andrij Zaverbnyj & Olha Levchenko, 2023. "Optimization of the Export Structure in Transport Companies: A Case Study," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 115-132.
    18. Puppala, Harish & Ahuja, Jaya & Tamvada, Jagannadha Pawan & Peddinti, Pranav R T, 2023. "New technology adoption in rural areas of emerging economies: The case of rainwater harvesting systems in India," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    19. Rong Wang & Fayuan Wang & Fan Bie, 2022. "Does Green Finance and Water Resource Utilization Efficiency Drive High-Quality Economic Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Goel, Raj Kumar & Vishnoi, Shweta, 2022. "Urbanization and sustainable development for inclusiveness using ICTs," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6).
    21. Androniceanu Armenia & Georgescu Irina, 2021. "E-Government in European Countries, a Comparative Approach Using the Principal Components Analysis," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 65-86, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13081-:d:940422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.