IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11233-d909436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pedestrian Single and Multi-Risk Assessment to SLODs in Urban Built Environment: A Mesoscale Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Graziano Salvalai

    (ABC Department, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Juan Diego Blanco Cadena

    (ABC Department, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Gessica Sparvoli

    (DICEA Department, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy)

  • Gabriele Bernardini

    (DICEA Department, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy)

  • Enrico Quagliarini

    (DICEA Department, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy)

Abstract

Pedestrians are increasingly exposed to slow-onset disasters (SLODs), such as air pollution and increasing temperatures in urban built environments (BEs). Pedestrians also face risks that arise from the combination of the BE features, the effects of SLODs on the microclimate, their own characteristics (e.g., health and ability), and the way they move and behave in indoor and outdoor BE areas. Thus, the effectiveness of sustainable risk-mitigation solutions for the health of the exposed pedestrians should be defined by considering the overlapping of such factors in critical operational scenarios in which such emergency conditions can appear. This work provides an innovative method to define a BE-oriented pedestrian risk index through a dynamic meso-scale approach that considers the daily variation of risk conditions. The method is ensured by a quick-to-apply approach, which also takes advantage of open-source repositories and tools to collect and manage input data, without the need for time-consuming in situ surveys. The resulting risk conditions are represented through meso-scale maps, which highlight the risk differences between BEs by focusing on their open spaces as fundamental parts of the urban road network. The method is applied to a significant case study (in Milan, Italy). The results demonstrate the ability of the approach to identify key input scenarios for risk assessment and mapping. The proposed methodology can: (1) provide insights for simulation activities in critical BE conditions, thanks to the identification of critical daily conditions for each of the factors and for single and multiple risks and (2) support the development of design and regeneration strategies in SLOD-prone urban BEs, as well as the identification of priority areas in the urban BE.

Suggested Citation

  • Graziano Salvalai & Juan Diego Blanco Cadena & Gessica Sparvoli & Gabriele Bernardini & Enrico Quagliarini, 2022. "Pedestrian Single and Multi-Risk Assessment to SLODs in Urban Built Environment: A Mesoscale Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-30, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11233-:d:909436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mona Jabbari & Fernando Fonseca & Rui Ramos, 2021. "Accessibility and Connectivity Criteria for Assessing Walkability: An Application in Qazvin, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Yunwon Choi & Heeyeun Yoon & Danya Kim, 2019. "Where do people spend their leisure time on dusty days? Application of spatiotemporal behavioral responses to particulate matter pollution," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(2), pages 317-339, October.
    3. Juan Diego Blanco Cadena & Graziano Salvalai & Michele Lucesoli & Enrico Quagliarini & Marco D’Orazio, 2021. "Flexible Workflow for Determining Critical Hazard and Exposure Scenarios for Assessing SLODs Risk in Urban Built Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Ilaria Pigliautile & Guido Marseglia & Anna Laura Pisello, 2020. "Investigation of CO 2 Variation and Mapping Through Wearable Sensing Techniques for Measuring Pedestrians’ Exposure in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Mylena Cristine Rodrigues de Jesus & Antônio Nélson Rodrigues da Silva, 2022. "Barrier Effect in a Medium-Sized Brazilian City: An Exploratory Analysis Using Decision Trees and Random Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Rakin Abrar & Showmitra Kumar Sarkar & Kashfia Tasnim Nishtha & Swapan Talukdar & Shahfahad & Atiqur Rahman & Abu Reza Md Towfiqul Islam & Amir Mosavi, 2022. "Assessing the Spatial Mapping of Heat Vulnerability under Urban Heat Island (UHI) Effect in the Dhaka Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    7. Jiyun Lee & Donghyun Kim & Jina Park, 2022. "A Machine Learning and Computer Vision Study of the Environmental Characteristics of Streetscapes That Affect Pedestrian Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    8. David Koren & Katarina Rus, 2019. "The Potential of Open Space for Enhancing Urban Seismic Resilience: A literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro D’Amico & Martina Russo & Marco Angelosanti & Gabriele Bernardini & Donatella Vicari & Enrico Quagliarini & Edoardo Currà, 2021. "Built Environment Typologies Prone to Risk: A Cluster Analysis of Open Spaces in Italian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-32, August.
    2. Natalia Distefano & Salvatore Leonardi & Nilda Georgina Liotta, 2023. "Walking for Sustainable Cities: Factors Affecting Users’ Willingness to Walk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Mona Jabbari & Zahra Ahmadi & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Defining a Digital System for the Pedestrian Network as a Conceptual Implementation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Mengyuan Sun & Yong Tian & Yao Zhang & Muhammad Nadeem & Can Xu, 2021. "Environmental Impact and External Costs Associated with Hub-and-Spoke Network in Air Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Sangwan Lee, 2022. "Satisfaction with the Pedestrian Environment and Its Relationship to Neighborhood Satisfaction in Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Enrico Quagliarini & Fabio Fatiguso & Michele Lucesoli & Gabriele Bernardini & Elena Cantatore, 2021. "Risk Reduction Strategies against Terrorist Acts in Urban Built Environments: Towards Sustainable and Human-Centred Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-29, January.
    7. Elena Cantatore & Dario Esposito & Alberico Sonnessa, 2023. "Mapping the Multi-Vulnerabilities of Outdoor Places to Enhance the Resilience of Historic Urban Districts: The Case of the Apulian Region Exposed to Slow and Rapid-Onset Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Kousis, I. & Manni, M. & Pisello, A.L., 2022. "Environmental mobile monitoring of urban microclimates: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    9. Zhengtao Li & Henk Folmer, 2023. "Air pollution and perception-based averting behaviour in the Jinchuan mining area, China," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(2), pages 477-505, April.
    10. Abdullah Addas & Ahmad Maghrabi & Ran Goldblatt, 2021. "Public Open Spaces Evaluation Using Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) in Saudi Universities: The Case of King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Mohsen Alawi & Dongzhu Chu & Seba Hammad, 2023. "Resilience of Public Open Spaces to Earthquakes: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Kestutis Zaleckis & Szymon Chmielewski & Jūratė Kamičaitytė & Indre Grazuleviciute-Vileniske & Halina Lipińska, 2022. "Walkability Compass—A Space Syntax Solution for Comparative Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Chaeyeon Yi & Hyukgi Kwon, 2023. "Spatial Relationship between Heat Illness Incidence and Heat Vulnerability in Gurye and Sunchang, South Korea, 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Le Zhang & Xiaoxiao Xu & Yanlong Guo, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of Commercial Street Quality Improvement Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method—Taking Hefei Shuanggang Old Street as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Jinsong Gan & Peizhen Li & Qiang Liu, 2019. "Study on Dynamic Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction of Three Adjacent Tall Buildings Subjected to Seismic Loading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Aline Pires Veról & Ianic Bigate Lourenço & João Paulo Rebechi Fraga & Bruna Peres Battemarco & Mylenna Linares Merlo & Paulo Canedo de Magalhães & Marcelo Gomes Miguez, 2020. "River Restoration Integrated with Sustainable Urban Water Management for Resilient Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-36, June.
    17. Savvas Emmanouilidis & Socrates Basbas & Alexandros Sdoukopoulos & Ioannis Politis, 2022. "Settlements along Main Road Axes: Blessing or Curse? Evaluating the Barrier Effect in a Small Greek Settlement," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Benyong Wei & Bin Hu & Wenhua Qi, 2023. "Fine–Scale Spatiotemporal Distribution Assessment of Indoor Population Based on Single Buildings: A Case in Dongcheng Subdistrict, Xichang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Jeongin Eum & Hyungkyoo Kim, 2021. "Effects of Air Pollution on Assaults: Findings from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    20. Martina Russo & Marco Angelosanti & Gabriele Bernardini & Laura Severi & Enrico Quagliarini & Edoardo Currà, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Intrinsic Seismic Risk of Open Spaces in Existing Built Environments: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11233-:d:909436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.