IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v10y2025a9703.html

Reclaiming Urban Spaces: A Systemic Approach to Integrated Pedestrian‐Centric City Design in Rio de Janeiro

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo Andrea Biraghi

    (Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Italy)

  • Hadi Mohammad Zadeh

    (Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Italy)

  • Andrea Bruschi

    (Sistemi per la Mobilità, MM, Italy)

  • Massimo Tadi

    (Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Italy)

Abstract

Quality public spaces, especially pedestrian areas, play an essential role in cities. Communities gather in these spaces and benefit from the proximity to activities in a safe and car‐free environment. Pedestrian areas can have greenery, which helps address the issues raised by climate change. Repurposing existing roads is a priority in many cities worldwide whose aim is to improve their social and environmental performance. This study presents a systemic, data‐based approach that supports the transition from the current pervasive car‐based mobility model to a people‐centric, pedestrian‐based one. This transformative model leverages the structural properties of urban systems to reconfigure streets as integral components of a comprehensive strategy aimed at mitigating the effects of climate change. Image segmentation is used to assess the presence of people in the streets. The numerical evidence provided by metrics and indicators is complemented by visual evidence from local‐scale maps. The proposed method is tested on a portion of Bairro Cidade Nova in Rio de Janeiro within the framework of the Integrated and Sustainable Urban Regeneration Milan–Rio (REMIRIO) project, a city‐to‐city cooperation project between Milan (Italy) and Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) funded by the European Union which aims to implement pilot nature‐based solutions to address local environmental issues such as flooding and overheating. In particular, five North–South streets are compared to define customised pedestrianisation interventions within a more comprehensive super‐block strategy with the aim of improving the continuity of the existing green system and the ecosystem services. This precise network diagnostic process can be easily transferred to any urban system.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo Andrea Biraghi & Hadi Mohammad Zadeh & Andrea Bruschi & Massimo Tadi, 2025. "Reclaiming Urban Spaces: A Systemic Approach to Integrated Pedestrian‐Centric City Design in Rio de Janeiro," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:9703
    DOI: 10.17645/up.9703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/9703
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.9703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gössling, Stefan & Choi, Andy & Dekker, Kaely & Metzler, Daniel, 2019. "The Social Cost of Automobility, Cycling and Walking in the European Union," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 65-74.
    2. Masayoshi Tanishita & Bert van Wee, 2017. "Impact of regional population density on walking behavior," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 661-678, August.
    3. Mona Jabbari & Fernando Fonseca & Rui Ramos, 2021. "Accessibility and Connectivity Criteria for Assessing Walkability: An Application in Qazvin, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Wei, Sheng & Zheng, Wei & Wang, Lei, 2021. "Understanding the configuration of bus networks in urban China from the perspective of network types and administrative division effect," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-17.
    5. Ayush Parajuli & Dorina Pojani, 2018. "Barriers to the pedestrianization of city centres: perspectives from the Global North and the Global South," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 142-160, January.
    6. Vikas Mehta, 2014. "Evaluating Public Space," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 53-88, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elek Pafka & Carlo Andrea Biraghi, 2025. "Walkability: From Spatial Analytics to Urban Coding and Actual Walking," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kędra, Arleta & Maleszyk, Piotr & Visvizi, Anna, 2023. "Engaging citizens in land use policy in the smart city context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Vitale Brovarone, Elisabetta & Staricco, Luca & Verlinghieri, Ersilia, 2023. "Whose is this street? Actors and conflicts in the governance of pedestrianisation processes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Mohammad Javad Kamelifar & Behzad Ranjbarnia & Houshmand Masoumi, 2022. "The Determinants of Walking Behavior before and during COVID-19 in Middle-East and North Africa: Evidence from Tabriz, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Li, Jin-Yang & Teng, Jing & Wang, Hui, 2023. "Integrating bipartite network modelling and overlapping community detection: A new method to evaluate transit line coordination," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 628(C).
    5. Dugan, Anna & Mayer, Jakob & Thaller, Annina & Bachner, Gabriel & Steininger, Karl W., 2022. "Developing policy packages for low-carbon passenger transport: A mixed methods analysis of trade-offs and synergies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Zuo, Jialing & Zheng, Wei & Hong, Jingke, 2024. "Interactions between centrality and commuting costs in a mountainous city: Implications for jobs-housing relationships and land use policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Tauri Tuvikene & Wladimir Sgibnev & Wojciech Kȩbłowski & Jason Finch, 2023. "Public transport as public space: Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 2963-2978, November.
    8. Mário Meireles & Paulo J. G. Ribeiro, 2020. "Digital Platform/Mobile App to Boost Cycling for the Promotion of Sustainable Mobility in Mid-Sized Starter Cycling Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, March.
    9. Adeline Gu'eret & Wolf-Peter Schill & Carlos Gaete-Morales, 2024. "Impacts of electric carsharing on a power sector with variable renewables," Papers 2402.19380, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    10. Jorge Urrutia‐Mosquera & Yasna Cortés & Luz Flórez‐Calderón & Marcelo Lufín, 2025. "Sustainable urban development and mobility. The role of spatial heterogeneity in sustainable trip patterns," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 2171-2188, April.
    11. Geržinič, Nejc & van Hagen, Mark & Al-Tamimi, Hussein & Duives, Dorine & van Oort, Niels, 2026. "How do activity-end trip characteristics affect the choice for shared micromobility? A latent class choice modelling approach for train station egress trips in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    12. Shi, Dehao & Wang, Lei & Zhang, Xianchun & Yu, Tao, 2025. "Borrowed size and borrowed administrative power: Effects of high-speed rail network on industrial upgrading and variegated externalities in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    13. Kestutis Zaleckis & Szymon Chmielewski & Jūratė Kamičaitytė & Indre Grazuleviciute-Vileniske & Halina Lipińska, 2022. "Walkability Compass—A Space Syntax Solution for Comparative Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Mona Jabbari & Zahra Ahmadi & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Defining a Digital System for the Pedestrian Network as a Conceptual Implementation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, February.
    15. Hynes, Stephen & Burger, Ryan & Tudella, João & Norton, Daniel & Chen, Wenting, 2022. "Estimating the costs and benefits of protecting a coastal amenity from climate change-related hazards: Nature based solutions via oyster reef restoration versus grey infrastructure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    16. Pablo Campos-Garzón & Javier Sevil-Serrano & Yaira Barranco-Ruíz & Palma Chillón, 2020. "Objective Measures to Assess Active Commuting Physical Activity to School in Young People: A Systematic Review Protocol and Practical Considerations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-10, August.
    17. Beata Fabisiak & Anna Jankowska & Robert Kłos, 2020. "Attitudes of Polish Seniors toward the Use of Public Space during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Bi, Hui & Ye, Zhirui & Hu, Liyang & Zhu, He, 2021. "Why they don't choose bus service? Understanding special online car-hailing behavior near bus stops," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 280-297.
    19. Maciej Kruszyna, 2022. "NOAH as an Innovative Tool for Modeling the Use of Suburban Railways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Mari Luz Brownrigg-Gleeson & Andres Monzon & Adriana Cortez, 2023. "Reasons to Pedestrianise Urban Centres: Impact Analysis on Mobility Habits, Liveability and Economic Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:9703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.