IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p9854-d884462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Philosophical Thought of Confucius and Mencius, and the Concept of the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind

Author

Listed:
  • Uzma Khan

    (Department of Philosophy, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Huili Wang

    (Department of Philosophy, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Zhongliang Cui

    (Institute of Contemporary Chinese Marxism, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
    Department of Philosophy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Abida Begum

    (School of Marxism, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Heilongjiang Province Think Tank for Ecological Civilization Construction and Green Development, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Abdullah Mohamed

    (Research Centre, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Heesup Han

    (College of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, 98 Gunja-Dong, Gwanjin-Gu, Seoul 143-747, Korea)

Abstract

The Community of a Shared Future for Mankind seeks to mitigate the world’s current challenges, and to create a more sustainable future through better global governance. Some of the philosophical arguments of the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind, and its foundations, which this article traces, are grounded in the philosophical teachings of Confucius and Mencius. The five pillars of Confucianism are benevolence (Ren), righteousness (Yi), propriety (Li), wisdom (Zhi) and fidelity (Xin). The five pillars have their equivalents in the philosophy of the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind: benevolence has its equivalents in multilateral and bilateral agreements; righteousness shows justice; propriety’s equivalents are international standards and regulations; wisdom is the problem-solving dialogues; and trustworthiness is equated to international organizations that safeguard global integrity. The Confucian principle of harmony is congruent with the objective of the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind, of creating a world of harmony, peace and cooperation. The Golden Rule has been observed in the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind, through its insistence on reciprocal bilateral and multilateral cooperation. Mencius’ philosophical contribution to the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind is in his theory of human nature, where humaneness is seen as developmental—as would be the community built by the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind. Mencius’ principle of governance is congruent with the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind’s insistence on responsible governance. These congruences and similarities, between the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind and the philosophies of Confucius and Mencius, point to the foundations for the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind.

Suggested Citation

  • Uzma Khan & Huili Wang & Zhongliang Cui & Abida Begum & Abdullah Mohamed & Heesup Han, 2022. "The Philosophical Thought of Confucius and Mencius, and the Concept of the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9854-:d:884462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9854/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9854/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Woods & David Lamond, 2011. "What Would Confucius Do? – Confucian Ethics and Self-Regulation in Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(4), pages 669-683, September.
    2. Haoguang Liang & Yaojun Zhang, 2019. "The Theoretical System of Belt and Road Initiative," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-13-7701-3, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irene Chu & Mai Chi Vu, 2022. "The Nature of the Self, Self-regulation and Moral Action: Implications from the Confucian Relational Self and Buddhist Non-self," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 245-262, September.
    2. Ming Kong & Jie Xin & Wenxiao Xu & Haonan Li & Dandan Xu, 2022. "The moral licensing effect between work effort and unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating influence of Confucian value," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 515-537, June.
    3. Kuo-Wei Lin & Kai-Ping Huang, 2014. "Moral judgment and ethical leadership in Chinese management: the role of Confucianism and collectivism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 37-47, January.
    4. Xiu, Zongfeng & Liu, Ran & Yin, Jingwei, 2022. "Confucian merchants culture, social movement and entrepreneurs’ political participation: evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 795-821.
    5. Mohsen Joshanloo, 2014. "Eastern Conceptualizations of Happiness: Fundamental Differences with Western Views," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 475-493, April.
    6. Opas Piansoongnern, 2016. "Chinese Leadership and Its Impacts on Innovative Work Behavior of the Thai Employees," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 17(1), pages 15-27, March.
    7. Li, Wanli & Xu, Xixiong & Long, Zhineng, 2020. "Confucian Culture and Trade Credit: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    8. Alejo José G. Sison & Ignacio Ferrero & Dulce M. Redín, 2020. "Some Virtue Ethics Implications from Aristotelian and Confucian Perspectives on Family and Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 241-254, August.
    9. Li, Chaoping & Zhao, Hao & Begley, Thomas M., 2015. "Transformational leadership dimensions and employee creativity in China: A cross-level analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1149-1156.
    10. Christopher Dupuis & Ying Zheng, 2024. "Import Penetration and Corporate Misconduct: A Natural Experiment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 475-506, December.
    11. Miguel Alzola & Alicia Hennig & Edward Romar, 2020. "Thematic Symposium Editorial: Virtue Ethics Between East and West," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 177-189, August.
    12. Zi-Miao Gao & Xiao-Guang Yue & Xiao-Jing Li, 2019. "Where Will the Future Be Heading Towards? A Book Review for “The Belt and Road Strategy in International Business and Administration”," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-6, August.
    13. Huei-Ting Tsai & Chung-Lin Tsai, 2022. "The influence of the five cardinal values of confucianism on firm performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 429-458, February.
    14. Min Huang & Xiaobo Li & Jun Xia & Mengyao Li, 2024. "Does Confucianism Prompt Firms to Participate in Poverty Alleviation Campaigns?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(4), pages 743-762, February.
    15. Lin Zhu & Xiaoming Li & Yao Huang & Fangyuan Liu & Chengji Yang & Dongyang Li & Hongpeng Bai, 2023. "Digital Technology and Green Development in Manufacturing: Evidence from China and 20 Other Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Jae Hyeung Kang & James G. Matusik & Lizabeth A. Barclay, 2017. "Affective and Normative Motives to Work Overtime in Asian Organizations: Four Cultural Orientations from Confucian Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 115-130, January.
    17. Kong, Xiaoran & Xu, Siping & Liu, Ming-Yu & Ho, Kung-Cheng, 2023. "Confucianism and D&O insurance demand of Chinese listed companies," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Daryl Koehn, 2020. "How Would Confucian Virtue Ethics for Business Differ from Aristotelian Virtue Ethics?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 205-219, August.
    19. Xiu, Zongfeng & Liu, Ran & Feng, Pengshuo & Yin, Jingwei, 2023. "Does social culture matter for firms' access to trade credit? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Zhihui Gu & Rui Zhang, 2025. "Management behaviour in Confucian culture," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(4), pages 2249-2253, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9854-:d:884462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.