IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10133-d889128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of the Production of Separated Municipal Solid Waste by Artificial Neural Networks in Croatia and the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Eda Puntarić

    (Ministry of Environment and Energy, Radnička cesta 80, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Lato Pezo

    (Institute of General and Physical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg, 12/V, 0721 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Željka Zgorelec

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Jerko Gunjača

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Dajana Kučić Grgić

    (Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Marulićev trg 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Neven Voća

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Given that global amounts of waste are growing rapidly, it is extremely important to determine what amount of waste will be generated in the near future. Accurate waste forecasting is also important for planning and designing a sustainable municipal solid waste (MSW) management system. For that reason, there is a need to build a model to predict the amount of MSW generated in the near future. Based on previous research, artificial neural networks (ANN) show better results in predicting waste generation compared to other mathematical models. In this research, an ANN model using the iterative algorithm Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS) for the prediction of MSW fractions, based on the socio-demographic characteristics, economic and industrial data obtained in Croatia and summarized data of the member states of EU (EU-27 from 2020), showed good predictive capabilities. The coefficient of determination during the training cycle for the output variables; household and similar waste (HHS), paper and cardboard waste (PCW), wood waste (WW), textile waste (TW), plastic waste (PW) and glass waste (GW) were 0.993; 0.997; 0.999; 0.997; 0.998; and 0.998, respectively, while reduced chi-square, mean bias error, root mean square error, mean percentage error, average absolute relative deviation and sum of squared errors were found low. In this paper, Yoon′s method of interpretation shows the relationships between socio-demographic data and the amount of generated waste. The results indicate that the lowest level of education shows a negative impact on observed waste-types calculations, with a relative impact between −9.889 and −4.467%. The most pronounced positive impact on the calculation of HHS, PCW, WW, TW, PW and GW was observed for year variable, gross domestic product, exports of goods and services, imports of goods and services, wages and salaries, secondary income, arrivals in collective accommodation establishments, overnight stays in collective accommodation establishments and exports of petroleum and petroleum products to partner countries, with a relative influence of 4.063–7.028; 2828–4851; 5240–6197; 5.308–6.341; 4290–4810; 4533–5805; and 4.345–4.493, respectively. The obtained results indicate that the amount of HHS waste at the EU-27 level in 2025 will decrease by approximately 18% compared to the data from 2018. The quantities of other observed recyclable types of waste will increase by 34% for PCW, 310% for WW, 40% for TW, 276% for PW and about 67% for GW. The amount of waste generated provides the basic information needed to plan, operate and optimize the waste management system. It could also help in the transition to an environmentally friendly and economically profitable circular economy. The model created in this research could also help with the system of separate waste collection, which would lead to more efficient recycling and the achievement of the set goals for recycling 55% of municipal waste by 2025.

Suggested Citation

  • Eda Puntarić & Lato Pezo & Željka Zgorelec & Jerko Gunjača & Dajana Kučić Grgić & Neven Voća, 2022. "Prediction of the Production of Separated Municipal Solid Waste by Artificial Neural Networks in Croatia and the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10133-:d:889128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nebojsa Nakicenovic & Peter D. Lund, 2021. "Could Europe become the first climate-neutral continent?," Nature, Nature, vol. 596(7873), pages 486-486, August.
    2. Alfredo Mazza & Prisco Piscitelli & Cosimo Neglia & Giulia Della Rosa & Leopoldo Iannuzzi, 2015. "Illegal Dumping of Toxic Waste and Its Effect on Human Health in Campania, Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Chattopadhyay, Pallavi Banerjee & Rangarajan, R., 2014. "Application of ANN in sketching spatial nonlinearity of unconfined aquifer in agricultural basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 81-91.
    4. Johan Hultman & Hervé Corvellec, 2012. "The European Waste Hierarchy: From the Sociomateriality of Waste to a Politics of Consumption," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(10), pages 2413-2427, October.
    5. Monika Kulisz & Justyna Kujawska, 2020. "Prediction of Municipal Waste Generation in Poland Using Neural Network Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2011. "Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(3), pages 203-214, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hasan Demir & Hande Demir & Biljana Lončar & Lato Pezo & Ivan Brandić & Neven Voća & Fatma Yilmaz, 2023. "Optimization of Caper Drying Using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks for Energy Efficiency Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfredo Mazza & Prisco Piscitelli & Andrea Falco & Maria Lucia Santoro & Manuela Colangelo & Giovanni Imbriani & Adele Idolo & Antonella De Donno & Leopoldo Iannuzzi & Annamaria Colao, 2018. "Heavy Environmental Pressure in Campania and Other Italian Regions: A Short Review of Available Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Jones, R.E. & Speight, R.E. & Blinco, J.L. & O'Hara, I.M., 2022. "Biorefining within food loss and waste frameworks: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Tsionas, Mike G., 2019. "Multi-objective optimization using statistical models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 364-378.
    4. Rachel Greer & Timo Wirth & Derk Loorbach, 2023. "The Circular Decision-Making Tree: an Operational Framework," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 693-718, June.
    5. Guo, Mengzhuo & Zhang, Qingpeng & Liao, Xiuwu & Chen, Frank Youhua & Zeng, Daniel Dajun, 2021. "A hybrid machine learning framework for analyzing human decision-making through learning preferences," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    6. John Byrne & Peter Lund & Job Taminiau, 2022. "Rapid climate transformation requires transformative policy and science thinking—An editorial essay," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), January.
    7. Julio Cezar Soares Silva & Diogo Ferreira de Lima Silva & Luciano Ferreira & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida-Filho, 2022. "A dominance-based rough set approach applied to evaluate the credit risk of sovereign bonds," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 139-164, March.
    8. Govindan, Kannan & Jepsen, Martin Brandt, 2016. "ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 1-29.
    9. Yifei Deng & Yijing Wang & Xiaofan Xing & Yuankang Xiong & Siqing Xu & Rong Wang, 2024. "Requirement on the Capacity of Energy Storage to Meet the 2 °C Goal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Liu, Jiapeng & Liao, Xiuwu & Kadziński, Miłosz & Słowiński, Roman, 2019. "Preference disaggregation within the regularization framework for sorting problems with multiple potentially non-monotonic criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1071-1089.
    11. Khaled Belahcène & Vincent Mousseau & Wassila Ouerdane & Marc Pirlot & Olivier Sobrie, 2023. "Multiple criteria sorting models and methods—Part I: survey of the literature," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-46, March.
    12. Annamaria Colao & Giovanna Muscogiuri & Prisco Piscitelli, 2016. "Environment and Health: Not Only Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-9, July.
    13. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Güner, Mehmet Oğuz & Kural, Orhan, 2024. "Effects of EU-Compliant mining waste regulation on Turkish mining sector: A review of characterization, classification, storage, management, recovery of mineral wastes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2023. "A compensatory value function for modeling risk tolerance and criteria interactions in preference disaggregation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    15. Chakhar, Salem & Ishizaka, Alessio & Labib, Ashraf & Saad, Inès, 2016. "Dominance-based rough set approach for group decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 206-224.
    16. Bustince, H. & Jurio, A. & Pradera, A. & Mesiar, R. & Beliakov, G., 2013. "Generalization of the weighted voting method using penalty functions constructed via faithful restricted dissimilarity functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(3), pages 472-478.
    17. Oliver Klein & Stefan Nier & Christine Tamásy, 2022. "Towards a Circular Bioeconomy? Pathways and Spatialities of Agri‐Food Waste Valorisation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(2), pages 194-210, April.
    18. Justyna Kujawska & Monika Kulisz & Piotr Oleszczuk & Wojciech Cel, 2023. "Improved Prediction of the Higher Heating Value of Biomass Using an Artificial Neural Network Model Based on the Selection of Input Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Katherine Mansilla-Obando & Fabiola Jeldes-Delgado & Nataly Guiñez-Cabrera, 2022. "Circular Economy Strategies with Social Implications: Findings from a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Miebs, Grzegorz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2022. "Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 633-651.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10133-:d:889128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.