IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/tvecsg/v113y2022i2p194-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Circular Bioeconomy? Pathways and Spatialities of Agri‐Food Waste Valorisation

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Klein
  • Stefan Nier
  • Christine Tamásy

Abstract

The treatment of organic waste, by‐products and other residual materials from bio‐based industries is currently changing from disposing to recycling and reusing activities, which may create significant added values. However, these valorisation pathways as well as their institutional and geographical contexts are not yet sufficiently understood. From an actor‐centric perspective, we seek to shed light on extant practices of agri‐food waste valorisation using the examples of potato and rapeseed production in Lower Saxony, Germany. Drawing on conceptual thoughts on circular bioeconomies and the nexus approach, we will show that these practices not only depend on the availability of (technological) solutions but are affected by changing economic and political environments in combination with place‐specific conditions and local networks. We further describe the cross‐sectoral relations, synergies and externalities that come along with by‐product valorisation in multi‐use systems, while also revealing the fragile stability of circular bioeconomies that are linked to the food–feed–energy nexus.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Klein & Stefan Nier & Christine Tamásy, 2022. "Towards a Circular Bioeconomy? Pathways and Spatialities of Agri‐Food Waste Valorisation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(2), pages 194-210, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:113:y:2022:i:2:p:194-210
    DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12500
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/tesg.12500?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jim Philp & David E. Winickoff, 2018. "Realising the circular bioeconomy," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 60, OECD Publishing.
    2. Johan Hultman & Hervé Corvellec, 2012. "The European Waste Hierarchy: From the Sociomateriality of Waste to a Politics of Consumption," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(10), pages 2413-2427, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, R.E. & Speight, R.E. & Blinco, J.L. & O'Hara, I.M., 2022. "Biorefining within food loss and waste frameworks: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Rachel Greer & Timo Wirth & Derk Loorbach, 2023. "The Circular Decision-Making Tree: an Operational Framework," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    3. George B. Frisvold & Steven M. Moss & Andrea Hodgson & Mary E. Maxon, 2021. "Understanding the U.S. Bioeconomy: A New Definition and Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Eda Puntarić & Lato Pezo & Željka Zgorelec & Jerko Gunjača & Dajana Kučić Grgić & Neven Voća, 2022. "Prediction of the Production of Separated Municipal Solid Waste by Artificial Neural Networks in Croatia and the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Katherine Mansilla-Obando & Fabiola Jeldes-Delgado & Nataly Guiñez-Cabrera, 2022. "Circular Economy Strategies with Social Implications: Findings from a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Alaeddin Koska & Mehri Banu Erdem, 2023. "Performance Analysis of Manufacturing Waste Using SWARA and VIKOR Methods: Evaluation of Turkey within the Scope of the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Song, Jinbo & Nie, Rong & Yuan, Hehui & Gao, Jingxin, 2023. "Does the renovation of waste-to-energy incineration plants attenuate the housing price gradient? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in Shenzhen, China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Nicolli, Francesco & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2013. "Landfill diversion in a decentralized setting: A dynamic assessment of landfill taxes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 17-23.
    9. Henrikke Baumann & Mathias Lindkvist, 2022. "A sociomaterial conceptualization of flows in industrial ecology," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 655-666, April.
    10. Kusuma, Ravi Teja & Hiremath, Rahul B. & Rajesh, Pachimatla & Kumar, Bimlesh & Renukappa, Suresh, 2022. "Sustainable transition towards biomass-based cement industry: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    11. Patrik Zapata & María José Zapata Campos, 2019. "Cities, institutional entrepreneurship and the emergence of new environmental policies: The organizing of waste prevention in the City of Gothenburg, Sweden," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(2), pages 339-359, March.
    12. Munten, Pauline & Vanhamme, Joëlle, 2023. "To reduce waste, have it repaired! The quality signaling effect of product repairability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Iris Vural Gursel & Berien Elbersen & Koen P. H. Meesters & Myrna van Leeuwen, 2022. "Defining Circular Economy Principles for Biobased Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Erika Machacek & Jessika Luth Richter & Ruth Lane, 2017. "Governance and Risk–Value Constructions in Closing Loops of Rare Earth Elements in Global Value Chains," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Les Levidow & Paul Upham, 2017. "Socio-technical change linking expectations and representations: Innovating thermal treatment of municipal solid waste," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 211-224.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:113:y:2022:i:2:p:194-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0040-747X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.