IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10095-d888551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Rural Settlements in Qinba Mountains, Shaanxi Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Sen Chen

    (College of Resource and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Muhammad Sajid Mehmood

    (The College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Shuchen Liu

    (College of Resource and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Yimin Gao

    (College of Resource and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

Abstract

Spatial patterns and the influencing determinants of rural settlements are the most important indicators for understanding the constituent structure of rural regional systems. However, there is little knowledge addressing the characteristics from the settlement perspective by realizing the spatial reconstruction and sustainable development of rural settlements. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the geographical, size, and morphological properties of rural settlement patterns in the Qinba Mountains in southern Shaanxi Province, China, using rural settlement and remote sensing data through spatial measurement index, gradient transects, demographic-economic index, and geodetector analysis. The results show the following: (1) Overall, rural settlements have spatial characteristics of “high-density multi-core clusters (0.8–1.6/km 2 ) and low-density broadly scattered (<0.08/km 2 )”. There is a significant positive correlation between the scale of rural settlement density and the characteristics of high-value agglomeration. (2) The spatial disparities of morphological traits of settlement shapes are significant. Furthermore, 1840 NP/piece of plain basin landform types provide high-value areas for each settlement feature value, and locations with moderate slopes are best for settlement dispersal. Moreover, rivers, roads, and distance from township centers are all examples of beneficial directivity. There is consistency between the spatial differentiation of rural settlement areas per capita and the distribution of settlement scale. Conversely, the settlement density is inconsistent with the agricultural production value density’s spatial distribution features. (3) The impact of geographical factors on the diversification of settlement characteristics has significant spatial differences. Moreover, natural ecological characteristics such as elevation and landform and the distribution of cultivated land strongly influence the spatial pattern of the study region. Finally, the study findings can be beneficial for land and space planning and rural governments to develop sustainable rural settlements.

Suggested Citation

  • Sen Chen & Muhammad Sajid Mehmood & Shuchen Liu & Yimin Gao, 2022. "Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Rural Settlements in Qinba Mountains, Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10095-:d:888551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Feng & Ye, Yaping & Song, Bowen & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Evaluation of urban suitable ecological land based on the minimum cumulative resistance model: A case study from Changzhou, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 194-203.
    2. Andrzej Rosner & Monika Wesołowska, 2020. "Deagrarianisation of the Economic Structure and the Evolution of Rural Settlement Patterns in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Song, Wei & Li, Huanhuan, 2020. "Spatial pattern evolution of rural settlements from 1961 to 2030 in Tongzhou District, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Carmen Carrión-Flores & Elena G. Irwin, 2004. "Determinants of Residential Land-Use Conversion and Sprawl at the Rural-Urban Fringe," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(4), pages 889-904.
    5. Yu Zhang & Pengcheng Wang & Tianwei Wang & Chongfa Cai & Zhaoxia Li & Mingjun Teng, 2018. "Scenarios Simulation of Spatio-Temporal Land Use Changes for Exploring Sustainable Management Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Guanglian Luo & Bin Wang & Dongqi Luo & Chaofu Wei, 2020. "Spatial Agglomeration Characteristics of Rural Settlements in Poor Mountainous Areas of Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Rui Zhou & Hao Zhang & Xin-Yue Ye & Xin-Jun Wang & Hai-Long Su, 2016. "The Delimitation of Urban Growth Boundaries Using the CLUE-S Land-Use Change Model: Study on Xinzhuang Town, Changshu City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao Sun & Jie Chen & Jie Guo, 2025. "Multi-Source Data-Driven Identification and Spatial Optimization of Rural Settlements: Evidence from Sangxu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Yuxiang Tan & Mingshun Xiang & Haixia Lu & Linsen Duan & Jin Yang & Jiake Meng & Ao Li & Lanlan Deng, 2023. "Spatial Difference Studies and Driving Force Analysis of Rural Settlements in the Northwest Sichuan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Jian Xu & Liangjun Zheng & Ruiqu Ma & Han Tian, 2023. "Correlation between Distribution of Rural Settlements and Topography in Plateau-Mountain Area: A Study of Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Zhe Lei & Weiran Han & Junhuan Li, 2025. "Spatial–Environmental Coupling and Sustainable Planning of Traditional Tibetan Villages: A Case Study of Four Villages in Suopo Township," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Xi Luo & Jian Zhang, 2025. "A Quantitative Method for Characterizing the Spatial Layout Features of Ethnic Minority Rural Settlements in Southern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Zhiyuan Yang & Dong Yang & Jingjie Geng & Fengxia Tian, 2022. "Evaluation of Suitability and Spatial Distribution of Rural Settlements in the Karst Mountainous Area of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Xi Luo & Jian Zhang, 2025. "Research on the Correlation Between Spatial Layout Characteristics and Geographical Conditions for Ethnic Minority Rural Settlements," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, July.
    8. John Adekunle Adesina & Yuanyuan Liu & Xiaolan Tang & Yujie Ren, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Geospatial Susceptibility on the Rural Agricultural Landscapes of Village Settlements in Southwestern Nigeria," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Ziqi Zhang & Xiaotong Wu & Song Chen & Lyuyuan Jia & Qianhui Wang & Zhiqing Zhang & Mingzhe Li & Ruofei Jia & Qing Lin, 2025. "Spatial Pattern and Driving Mechanisms of Settlements in the Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China: A Case Study of Eastern Inner Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, June.
    10. Han Cao & Eunyoung Kim, 2025. "Analysis of Influencing Factors on Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Traditional Villages in the Liaoxi Corridor," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-35, July.
    11. Lili Liu & Meng Chen & Pingping Luo & Maochuan Hu & Weili Duan & Ahmed Elbeltagi, 2023. "A Novel Integrated Spatiotemporal-Variable Model of Landscape Changes in Traditional Villages in the Jinshaan Gorge, Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geng, Bo & Tian, Yugang & Zhang, Lihao & Chen, Bo, 2023. "Evolution and its driving forces of rural settlements along the roadsides in the northeast of Jianghan Plain, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Jian Xu & Liangjun Zheng & Ruiqu Ma & Han Tian, 2023. "Correlation between Distribution of Rural Settlements and Topography in Plateau-Mountain Area: A Study of Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Xiaowei Yao & Di Wu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Changes and Influencing Factors of Rural Settlements in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Region, 1990–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Ende Yang & Qiang Yao & Bin Long & Na An & Yu Liu, 2024. "Progress in the Research of Features and Characteristics of Mountainous Rural Settlements: Distribution, Issues, and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-45, May.
    5. Guanglian Luo & Bin Wang & Bin Li & Ruiwei Li & Dongqi Luo, 2022. "Quantitative Analysis of Spatial–Temporal Differentiation of Rural Settlements Extinction in Mountainous Areas Based on Reclamation Projects: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Jingyu Liu & Qiong Song & Xiaomin Wang, 2023. "Spatial Morphology Evolution of Rural Settlements in the Lower Yellow River Plain: The Case of Menggang Town in Changyuan City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Cho, Seong-Hoon & Kim, Heeho & Roberts, Roland K. & Kim, Taeyoung & Lee, Daegoon, 2014. "Effects of changes in forestland ownership on deforestation and urbanization and the resulting effects on greenhouse gas emissions," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 93-109.
    8. Yu Zhang & Siang Duan & Li Dong & Xiaoming Ding, 2025. "Spatial Sustainability of Agricultural Rural Settlements: An Analysis of Rural Spatial Patterns and Influencing Factors in Three Northeastern Provinces of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-29, June.
    9. Changchun Feng & Hao Zhang & Liang Xiao & Yongpei Guo, 2022. "Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Carrión-Flores, Carmen E. & Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso & Guci, Ledia, 2018. "An estimator for discrete-choice models with spatial lag dependence using large samples, with an application to land-use conversions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 77-93.
    11. Barry Kew & Brian D. Lee, 2013. "Measuring Sprawl across the Urban Rural Continuum Using an Amalgamated Sprawl Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Danning Chen & Weifeng Chen & Xincun Zhu & Shugang Xie & Peiyu Du & Xiaolong Chen & Dong Lv, 2025. "Multi-Scenario Simulation and Restoration Strategy of Ecological Security Pattern in the Yellow River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Zhenzhen Yuan & Weijie Li & Yong Wang & Dayun Zhu & Qiuhong Wang & Yan Liu & Lingyan Zhou, 2022. "Ecosystem Health Evaluation and Ecological Security Patterns Construction Based on VORSD and Circuit Theory: A Case Study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Suzanne Vallance, 2014. "Living on the Edge: Lessons from the Peri-urban Village," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 1954-1969, November.
    15. Changqing Sun & Yulong Bao & Battsengel Vandansambuu & Yuhai Bao, 2022. "Simulation and Prediction of Land Use/Cover Changes Based on CLUE-S and CA-Markov Models: A Case Study of a Typical Pastoral Area in Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Li, Sheng & Nadolnyak, Denis & Hartarska, Valentina, 2019. "Agricultural land conversion: Impacts of economic and natural risk factors in a coastal area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 380-390.
    17. Maples, Chellie H. & Hagerman, Amy D. & Lambert, Dayton M., 2022. "Ex-ante effects of the 2018 Agricultural Improvement Act’s grassland initiative," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    19. Martinetti, Davide & Geniaux, Ghislain, 2017. "Approximate likelihood estimation of spatial probit models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 30-45.
    20. Lynch, Lori & Geoghegan, Jacqueline, 2011. "FOREWORD: The Economics of Land Use Change: Advancing the Frontiers," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 40(3), pages 1-6, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10095-:d:888551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.